There are two separate things that you deal with in R.
The first is raw data. A simple spreadsheet program like gnumeric or a
texteditor sufices to enter the data.
Once you've got the raw data, you (ideally) perform all of the
manipulations of that data in R to prepare your graphs. In
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, James Stone wrote:
I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn
with a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people
do. [But when you need
I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with
a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do.
[But when you need its features, it's often the only
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, elijah wright wrote:
methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN
Like http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/ ? ;-)
Don Armstrong
--
The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing
that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing
There are two separate things that you deal with in R.
The first is raw data. A simple spreadsheet program like gnumeric or a
texteditor sufices to enter the data.
Once you've got the raw data, you (ideally) perform all of the
manipulations of that data in R to prepare your graphs. In
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, James Stone wrote:
I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn
with a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people
do. [But when you need
I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with
a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do.
[But when you need its features, it's often the only
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, elijah wright wrote:
methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN
Like http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/ ? ;-)
Don Armstrong
--
The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing
that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing
8 matches
Mail list logo
