I notice the following error at the end of a package session:
dpkg-deb: building package `debianadv' in
`../debianadv_0.0.20050516-1_all.deb'.
signfile debianadv_0.0.20050516-1.dsc
gpg: skipped `Mauro Darida [EMAIL PROTECTED]': secret key not
available
gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key
On Monday 16 May 2005 11:07 pm, Mauro Darida wrote:
I notice the following error at the end of a package session:
gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available
Create ~/.devscripts
Add:
DEBSIGN_KEYID=your_key_id
I've also added:
DEBUILD_DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTS=-i -ICVS -I.svn
Also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 11:07 pm, Mauro Darida wrote:
I notice the following error at the end of a package session:
gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available
Create ~/.devscripts
Add:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:31:21AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 11:07 pm, Mauro Darida wrote:
I notice the following error at the end of a package session:
gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not
I did it, Depends now looks like this:
Depends: python (= 2.3), python ( 2.4)
I have read about it before at debian python policy. But the problem now
is that my ubuntu friends can not install reddo cause ubuntu use python
2.4. I know that ubuntu is not debian, i want to make packages
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Ben Finney wrote:
I'd like to submit patches for a couple of packages that currently use
hand-rolled debian/rules files. Is the current best practise to use
debhelper, or cdbs, or something else?
The current best practise is to not assume that everybody wants to use
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.17.1342 +0200]:
I think it's a miss-quote. Morgenröte (The Dawn), where I believe
this is from, deals a lot with belief not with thought, and
Nietzsche makes a big deal about this distinction throughout his
works. I would be surprised if
Thanks Nelson. I've just upload a new version.
Reply in line:
El lun, 16-05-2005 a las 20:48 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
As Ben said to me:
You still need to differentiate between what you get from the upstream
package
On 20050517T113556+1000, Ben Finney wrote:
I'd like to submit patches for a couple of packages that currently use
hand-rolled debian/rules files. Is the current best practise to use
debhelper, or cdbs, or something else?
Don't do it without the maintainer's go-ahead. The current best
practice
Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Bas Wijnen may or may not have written...
Erik Schanze wrote:
[snip]
Seriously, I think you should improve your long description to explain to
an (unexperienced) user what this package is for. What can you do with
this assembler? Why should you install it?
I'm still looking for a sponsor for the UrlGfe package. If anyone wants
to sponsor it, please mail me. Thanks.
Package name: urlgfe
License: GPL
URL: http://urlget.sourceforge.net/
Description: graphical download manager
UrlGfe is a graphical file downloading program.
It supports multiple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
David Gil wrote:
I did it, Depends now looks like this:
Depends: python (= 2.3), python ( 2.4)
I have read about it before at debian python policy. But the problem now
is that my ubuntu friends can not install reddo cause ubuntu use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Adrian Mastronardi wrote:
Those 2 bugs are ITP.
Have you contacted those people before doing your package?
As I know, Gromacs ITP is active. There is no version on Debian because of a
bug on Gromacs. Nicholas Breen [EMAIL PROTECTED] already did
On 17-May-2005, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Ben Finney wrote:
I'd like to submit patches for a couple of packages that currently
use hand-rolled debian/rules files. Is the current best practise
to use debhelper, or cdbs, or something else?
The current best practise is to
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 04:11, Adeodato Simó wrote:
debhelper(7) contains a list of all the available dh_foo programs, and
a short description of each.
not quite, it only lists those delivered by the debhelper package, below the
list the manpage has the following:
If a program's name
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Ben Finney wrote:
I'm surprised that people have consistently read submit patches as
somehow bypassing the maintainer, or telling him what to do. To whom
would I be submitting the patches, if not the maintainer?
To the maintainer, via the BTS as a wishlist bug. That's
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
If I were to receive a bug report, say wishlist severity, containing a
patch that rewrites one of my packages' debian/rules to use debhelper, I
would be very upset: it would feel like an insult toward my style of
packaging.
You need to grow a thicker skin. By
Quoting Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
If I were to receive a bug report, say wishlist severity, containing a
patch that rewrites one of my packages' debian/rules to use debhelper, I
would be very upset: it would feel like an insult toward my style of
packaging.
You
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
Don't do it without the maintainer's go-ahead. The current best
practice is to use whatever (non-evil thing that) works for the
maintainer.
This best practice fails miserably if the maintainer is not always
perfectly responsive. As soon as the maintainer goes on
also sprach Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.17.1800 +0200]:
You need to grow a thicker skin. By your reasoning, any
substantial patch or code review is a personal attack; that is not
an attitude that is conducive to evolving good code.
Unfortunately, we have many thin-skinned
Mauro Darida wrote on 17/05/2005 00:19:
trying to make an html from a latex source for my package. When I type:
latex2html foo.tex
it produces an html code which has double captions for each table. I do not
know if:
1. it is a latex2html fault
2. it is a bad rendered page by my browser
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 18.00, Joey Hess wrote:
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
If I were to receive a bug report, say wishlist severity, containing a
patch that rewrites one of my packages' debian/rules to use debhelper,
I would be very upset: it would feel like an insult toward my style of
[Cc-ing Ryan Murray because this question relates to libgc, one of his
packages.]
I am building packages of Asymptote[1], hopefully for eventual inclusion
in Debian. The latest version has started depending on the Boehm
garbage collection library (libgc). However, upstream strongly
recommends
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:48:30PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
- just use libgc as-is, ignoring the performance hit
No problems with this option, other than the perf. hit.
- add the Boehm gc tarball into the Asymptote source file, and let
Asymptote compile it the way it wants to. However,
Thanks, Ryan, for your quick reply. I suspected that the correct thing
to do would be to just accept the performance hit (although 15% seems
pretty significant). I'll wait to see if anyone else has suggestions.
Otherwise, I'll just compile using normal libgc, and talk with my
upstream.
By the
On 5/17/05, Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ryan, for your quick reply. I suspected that the correct thing
to do would be to just accept the performance hit (although 15% seems
pretty significant). I'll wait to see if anyone else has suggestions.
Otherwise, I'll just compile
Adrian von Bidder wrote on 17/05/2005 21:36:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 15.07, Ben Finney wrote:
I'm surprised that people have consistently read submit patches as
somehow bypassing the maintainer, or telling him what to do. To whom
would I be submitting the patches, if not the maintainer?
If I
Hello there
I'm looking for a sponsor (and feedback!) for `md5deep' (ITP: #309497).
The source package is available at: http://niall.evil.ie/debian/md5deep/
Cheers,
Niall
Description follows:
forensics programs to compute digests on files
md5deep is similar to the md5sum program found in the
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 05:24:08AM +0200, David Gil wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for the reddo application that I
develop myself.
Package name: reddo
Licence : GPL
Short description : reddo internet translator
Long description: Reddo is a command
On 5/17/05, Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael == Michael K Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael I'd be surprised if it's that bad under NPTL, and if it is, I'd
Michael be surprised if it can't be substantially improved (at least on
Michael x86) with a little bit of oprofile
30 matches
Mail list logo
