On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 03:58:28PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Please check your package with lintian. A few problems are:
- - debian/libupnp3.shlibs still has the old soname in it
- - debian/control has the old maintainer in it, you should update it
- - please update standards version
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: bibus
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Pierre Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://bibus-biblio.sourceforge.net
License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : bibliographic and reference
Charles Plessy wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: bibus
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Pierre Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://bibus-biblio.sourceforge.net
License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Le Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 08:31:39AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI a écrit :
Charles Plessy wrote:
Upstream author is responsive and packaged Bibus as a Debian native
pacakge. In the following SourceForge bug, he invites people to
finish the work and make bibus an official Debian package.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:34:09PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote..
I'm sending this mail again since I had some SMTP problems in the
past days, and since it doesn't show up in the online archive I
think it's safe to assume it didn't made to the list.
In case it did, forgive me for the
Mauro Lizaur wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I'm not a DD or a DM, but i while i was checking your package i got
these lintian warnings:
I: uniconvertor: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 1668kB 87%
N:
N: The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data
N: in /usr/share, while it
Hey
As I understand it; this is a warning if you have a lot of extra-files
like examples or data-files. Then this should go in a dedicated -data
package. The warning appears as the package has some C-code and some
python scripts, and it sees the pyton scripts as extra-files. So I
believe it
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package eva.
* Package name: eva
Version : 0.4.921.20080127-1
Upstream Authors : yunfan [EMAIL PROTECTED], casper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/evaq
* License : GPL
Section :
Patrick Winnertz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
W: uniconvertor: script-not-executable
./usr/share/pycentral/uniconvertor/site-packages/uniconvertor/__init__
.py N:
N: This file starts with the #! sequence that marks interpreted
scripts, N: but it is not executable.
N:
Looking into
I'm working on a package of the last release of liblicense. The
liblicense source package generates liblicense.so.1 in a
liblicense1 package and a program /usr/bin/license that links to
liblicense.so.1 to do its job.
liblicense, by means of background, is a C library. Its mission in life
is
Asheesh Laroia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When building this dsc
http://asheesh.org/debian/pool/main/libl/liblicense/liblicense_0.5.1-1.dsc,
I get at the end of the build:
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library liblicense.so.1 needed by
debian/liblicense-cli/usr/bin/license (its
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Asheesh Laroia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When building this dsc
http://asheesh.org/debian/pool/main/libl/liblicense/liblicense_0.5.1-1.dsc,
I get at the end of the build:
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library liblicense.so.1 needed by
Asheesh Laroia skrev:
Naturally, I'm probably doing something wrong - but I have no idea what
it is. I think that the soname and library package name are correct,
for one thing. Can someone perhaps help?
If you use dh_shlibdeps, you can try this:
dh_shlibdeps -Lliblicense1
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 01:20 -0200, Mauro Lizaur wrote:
I: uniconvertor: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 1668kB 87%
I've split the package into the main package unconvertor (arch: all) and an
additional package uniconvertor-modules containing the arch-dependant modules
(arch: any).
W:
Le Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:46:42PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
I'm working on a package of the last release of liblicense. The
liblicense source package generates liblicense.so.1 in a
liblicense1 package and a program /usr/bin/license that links to
liblicense.so.1 to do its job.
Dear
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:46:42PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
I'm working on a package of the last release of liblicense. The
liblicense source package generates liblicense.so.1 in a liblicense1
package and a program /usr/bin/license that links
Le Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 05:19:46PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
I actually don't know about another program that provides a
/usr/bin/license, even not in Debian. I honestly don't think this is a
conflict.
For Debian, apt-file can help. Otherwise, I googled for
/usr/bin/license, and
I demand that Andreas Wenning may or may not have written...
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 01:20 -0200, Mauro Lizaur wrote:
[snip]
The binary name is uniconv, I think it should be uniconvertor
The problem is, that inkscape directly uses the name uniconv. If the
executable is renamed to uniconvertor,
Ciao,
this is a Non-Maintainer upload to fix RC bug #466584, it's only a
missing build-dep. I want to specify that this is my first NMU attempt
so, if you find errors in the procedure, sorry in advance...
I've added some patches to fix lintian warning on manpage errors and
some other small
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Asheesh Laroia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have dh_makeshlibs commented out in your debian/rules file. You have
to run dh_makeshlibs when building shared libraries. Otherwise, you don't
get a shlibs file, which means that the shared library package
1 rpath issues on amd64
2 GFDL copyright issue of documents
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:09 AM, yhlfh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package eva.
* Package name: eva
Version : 0.4.921.20080127-1
Upstream Authors : yunfan [EMAIL
21 matches
Mail list logo
