On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 22:32 +0800, Paul Wise escribió:
> > #474020 should not have been closed with a -done message, instead you
> > should have closed it in the changelog of the new version. Leave it
> > as-is
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:16:28 +1000 Jack Coulter wrote:
> I've spoken again to matricks, he's stated that in the next release,
> he'll be changing the license slightly, it will still remain free, but
> he's going to clarify the last point.
That silly restriction should not be "clarified"! It sh
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:25:46PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
>This FTBFS for me. On the other hand, how did it become a QA package?
>(just asking, no puns).
I built it on i384 but failed on mips last night. I'll try again later
today on those platforms and on amd64 as well.
--
"Red Rosa now has vanish
Barry deFreese wrote:
Amaya wrote:
Barry deFreese wrote:
If someone has time to review and/or possibly upload I would
appreciate it.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libggi/libggi_2.2.2-1.dsc
This FTBFS for me. On the other hand, how did it become a QA package?
(just aski
2008/4/15 Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> > Please fix your copyright file:
> > | It was downloaded from
> > | ..
> > | # Please also look if there are files or directories which have a
> > | # different copyright/license attached and list them here.
> >
> > Wh
Amaya wrote:
Barry deFreese wrote:
If someone has time to review and/or possibly upload I would appreciate it.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libggi/libggi_2.2.2-1.dsc
This FTBFS for me. On the other hand, how did it become a QA package?
(just asking, no puns).
What
Hello Paul,
First of all, thank you for your help.
El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 22:32 +0800, Paul Wise escribió:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.1-1
> > of my package "lynis".
>
> Sorry I mis
Barry deFreese wrote:
> If someone has time to review and/or possibly upload I would appreciate it.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libggi/libggi_2.2.2-1.dsc
This FTBFS for me. On the other hand, how did it become a QA package?
(just asking, no puns).
--
·''`. Come, let me si
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 11:44 -0700, Andrew McClain wrote:
> I'm building a package (mogile-server) that is split up into two
> related sub-packages (mogilefsd and mogstored). How do I deal with the
> two helper-scripts that are common between both sub-packages?
Either:
package A must depend on pack
I'm building a package (mogile-server) that is split up into two related
sub-packages (mogilefsd and mogstored). How do I deal with the two
helper-scripts that are common between both sub-packages? Can I mark them as
"common", or do I need to split them into a "mogile-server-common" package?
Best,
> What is the reason for adding the dnsutils suggests?
I suggested add dnsutils, because dig is used by
lynis/include/tests_networking. A Recommend or Depend might be more
appropriate though.
Helmut
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.1-1
> of my package "lynis".
Sorry I missed the previous version, some comments:
#474020 should not have been closed with a -done message, instead you
should have c
Helmut Grohne wrote:
Also I've uploaded source package to mentors.debian.net for convenience:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nlkt.
Please fix your copyright file:
| It was downloaded from
| ..
| # Please also look if there are files or directories which have a
| # different
> So, in nlkt_0.2.3_deb-src.tar.gz i've provided .dsc, .diff, .orig.tar.gz
> files - it is regular non-native debian package, isn't it?
It is. And it is properly accessible now, thanks:
> Also I've uploaded source package to mentors.debian.net for convenience:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debi
Hi,
One of my packages, [1]yorick-yeti has been [2]built successfully on
all official platforms, including [3]mips on Fri 28 Mar, but the mips
package is still [2]not installed on the archive. It is held out of
Lenny for this reason. I sent an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue 8
Apr to n
Barry deFreese wrote:
> If someone has time to review and/or possibly upload I would appreciate it.
I will look at it if nobody else is already doing so.
Thanks for you effort.
--
·''`. Come, let me sing into your ear, those dancing days are gone
: :' : I carry the sun in a golden cup,
2008/4/15, Jack Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Matricks also asked me to post his remarks on the licensing situation:
>
> [...]
Well, he seems a reasonable one in the end. I'm sorry for my hard
words in my previous mails, he didn't deserve them. He seems a bit
burn out, I think we could make hi
I've temporarily removed the package from mentors as it's now been
uploaded to the debian-games SVN and a number of technical problems with
the package are being resolved, I'll reupload it to mentors and send out
a new RFS when its ready.
Matricks also asked me to post his remarks on the licen
Due to the upstream licensing issues revealed in this thread:
http://forums.urbanterror.net/index.php/topic,9651.0.html
(Summary: Upstream violates GPL)
I will be removing urbanterror and urbanterror-data from mentors until
upstream resolves their own licensing issues, at which point I'll update
Hi,
the ia32-libs package will be split into seperate source packages (95
alltogether). Since my comaintainer is currently bussy I'm looking for
a sponsor for the first wave of those packages. The main converter
package and the 5 packages that are ia64 only in ia32-libs.
The packages are on mento
2008/4/15, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:03:17AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz a écrit :
>
> > In general I try to avoid heated discussions with stubborn upstreams
> > The 4th point is simply totally stupid and useless
> > Some upstreams are just plainly stupid
> > It's simp
After 8 RFS mails for tcng sent to various places, including 3 here, I guess
that's a record. Especially for a RC bug fix.
Yet, finally Sven Mueller became the hero who uploaded it. Yay for him!
And boo for the rest of you lazy bastards :p
(Ok, ok, that's probably a fault of me and my lack of
Dear Neil, thank you for the fast answer !
Le Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 07:56:48AM +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
>
> I would add the simple patchsys to that one - it makes it easier for
> people to do NMU's on your package at a later date, even if you don't
> use it yourself.
>
> include /usr/share/
Le Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:03:17AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz a écrit :
> In general I try to avoid heated discussions with stubborn upstreams
> The 4th point is simply totally stupid and useless
> Some upstreams are just plainly stupid
> It's simply too childish.
Hello Miriam,
while I do not really disa
Alright, so all the licensing semantics aside, are there any technical
issues with my package? Or are we set for someone to sponsor it?
Thanks,
Jack Coulter
Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Jack Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After having a heated debate with matricks a
2008/4/15, Jack Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After having a heated debate with matricks and another developer void_ on
> the teeworlds IRC channel, they are unwilling to change/remove point 4, but
> brought up (as it has been here) that there are already packages in main
> with similar clauses.
Helmut Grohne wrote:
Please provide a dsc file. It also looks like you have created a native
package. Is this necessary? See
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html#native_vs_non_native
Helmut
So, in nlkt_0.2.3_deb-src.tar.gz i've provided .dsc, .diff, .orig.tar.gz
files - i
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Jack Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After having a heated debate with matricks and another developer void_ on
> the teeworlds IRC channel, they are unwilling to change/remove point 4, but
> brought up (as it has been here) that there are already packages in m
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Jack Coulter wrote:
> Just to add, matricks made a quick summary on the teeworlds trac
> summarising his point:
> (http://trac.teeworlds.com/trac/wiki/TiredMatricks)
>
> " Why I wont discuss these subjects
> All people have a limited amount of time. As I'm almost the onl
29 matches
Mail list logo
