On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:14:38AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > I'll try to make a list of all the icons if necessary, but it seems
> > like that will take a long time to manually go through all of them.
>
> Evgeni, your opinion? I think, it would be nice, but not necessary.
Didn't I wrote it
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:59:30AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 23:10 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov:
> > Evgeni, ending the mail-flood for now and hating the fact that PD does
> > not exist in Germany as it does in US etc.
>
> It's sad, that public domain does not exi
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 15:37 -0400 schrieb Victor Castillejo:
> For Arc-Colors, nuno designed the KDE4 login screen, on which the
> wallpapers are based on. Daniel P. Fore did the original xml file and
> textboxes, which was then heavily modified to suit Arc-Colors.
For nuno "Arc-*.png" wo
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 23:10 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov:
> Evgeni, ending the mail-flood for now and hating the fact that PD does
> not exist in Germany as it does in US etc.
It's sad, that public domain does not exists in Germany, but we can use
e.g. CC0 [1] license instead or we could wr
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb:
[...]
> Hello,
>
> please always have the link to the dsc somewhere :)
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/concordance/concordance_0.21-1.dsc
I'll keep that in mind, sorry. It's been re-updated.
>
>
> First do a 'grep -c \ $ *' in your debian/ dir and
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:13:02 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Again, that would be best. But if this proves problematic, would
> > simply removing this section be acceptable, since putting them in the
> > public domain explicitly gives up copyright? Implying that we are
> > relicensing them in Debi
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:37:58 -0400 Victor Castillejo wrote:
> I'll try to make a list of all the icons if necessary, but it seems like
> that will take a long time to manually go through all of them.
More a nicehave here, I think. Others may think different...
> BTW, is the Shiki package the only
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:23:59 -0400 Andrew SB wrote:
> I suppose the real question is whether or not including the copyright
> year is a MUST or SHOULD. As Benjamin notes, gnome-icon-theme is
> already in Debian and does not include the years in their
> debian/copyright.
It's a should as far as I k
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 22:40 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov:
> > > + COPYING says GPL-2+, you write GPL-2 for upstreams code?
> >
> > COPYING only says, that it is GPL-2. It does not specify if it is "v2
> > only" or "v2 or later". So we should assume "v2 only".
>
> COPYING is a pure copy of
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:42:54 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 13:18 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov:
> > On Fri, 29 May 2009 14:31:38 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >
> > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> >
> > Okay, Dima was right, thursday, not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Dreibholz schrieb:
> Dear Patrick,
>
> thank you for your review of the SubNetCalc package. The updated package at
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ should fix the two
> problems:
> - Added "Closes" field with ITP num
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 15:23 -0400 schrieb Andrew SB:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Benjamin Drung
> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 13:18 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov:
> >> + Do you have years of copyright for the other contributors?
> >
> > They are copied from gnome-icon-th
Dear Patrick,
thank you for your review of the SubNetCalc package. The updated package at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/ should fix the two
problems:
- Added "Closes" field with ITP number
- Shortened GPL block in debian/copyright
Best regards
Thomas Dreibholz
sig
>I searched for the email addresses, but I do not found one. Victor, do
you have the email addresses?
These are the addresses I found for both of them, after some googling:
Daniel P. Fore: daniel.p.f...@gmail.com
Nuno Pinheiro: n...@oxygen-icons.org
For Arc-Colors, nuno designed the KDE4 login sc
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 13:18 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov:
>> + Do you have years of copyright for the other contributors?
>
> They are copied from gnome-icon-theme. I will add 2002-2008 to all of
> them.
I actually email the upstream
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 13:18 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov:
> On Fri, 29 May 2009 14:31:38 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Okay, Dima was right, thursday, not tuesday :)
> But here comes my review, very cosmetic:
>
> arc-colors-
yo...@gmx.net writes:
> Hello,
>
> i want to build a libary and a binary from one sourcefile.
> I run dh_make twice once with single binary, once with library.
>
> Is this possible? Which files i have to change too?
>
> attached controlfile:
>
> Source: libxy-tools
> Section: unknown
> Pri
Hi Krzysztof,
sorry for my (usual) late reply..
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 15:29, Krzysztof Burghardt
wrote:
> 2009/5/19 Sandro Tosi :
>> $ wbar
>> Using /usr/share/wbar/dot.wbar config file.
>> Using a Super Bar.
>> /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/pidgin.png -> Couldn't load icon image.
>
> Fil
On Fri, 29 May 2009 14:31:38 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Okay, Dima was right, thursday, not tuesday :)
But here comes my review, very cosmetic:
arc-colors-1.7.1/debian/copyright:
+ You miss © everywhere.
+ Please write an own Copyright:
Hello,
i want to build a libary and a binary from one sourcefile.
I run dh_make twice once with single binary, once with library.
Is this possible? Which files i have to change too?
attached controlfile:
Source: libxy-tools
Section: unknown
Priority: extra
Maintainer:
Build-Depends: de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schrieb:
> Thanks.
>
> I've applied the suggested changes to the files, and pushed it back on
> mentors.debian.net. It's using the same version number as before, just
> overwrote the files. Not sure if this is the preferred way
Thomas Dreibholz schrieb:
On Mittwoch 03 Juni 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
* debian/changelog:
- Missing close of an ITP in Debian.
This won't close the bug. Have a look in the policy how to close bugs.
* debian/copyright:
- You miss your own copyright for your debian/ work.
You don't need
The FAQ covers this and other related questions:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
In short there are no guarantees and it is up to you to motivate a DD
to sponsor your package(s).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentor
Hello Federico,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:29, Federico Hernandez wrote:
> What are the policies on resubmitting a RFS? How long should one wait? I
there is no definite time; rule of thumb will say "wait a couple of
week, then reply to the original RFS to renew it". You may also
address different
What are the policies on resubmitting a RFS? How long should one wait? I
tried to find some information on this looking through the archives but
couldn't find anything.
THX and greetings,
/Federico
Sune Vuorela writes:
> as I remember it, only one sponsor have expressed that he prefers the
> revision bumped each time.
As I remember it, the majority express no preference. That leads me to
conclude that what makes it smoother for the particular combination of
maintainer-plus-sponsor is more
On 2009-06-04, Ben Finney wrote:
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre writes:
>
>> I've applied the suggested changes to the files, and pushed it back on
>> mentors.debian.net. It's using the same version number as before, just
>> overwrote the files. Not sure if this is the preferred way to do this.
>> I'm
27 matches
Mail list logo
