Hello,
I try to build a package for i386 and amd64. I cross-build the i386 package with
the recommendation of the FAQ: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianAMD64Faq#line-95 but
independent architecture packages (common.dev, dev.dev and debian.tar.gz) are
a different size.
The content is the same, it's
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:07:11 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-14, 15:41:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
the example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I moved the man
pages upstream I got a bug report
Hello,
I try to build a package for i386 and amd64. I cross-build the i386 package with
the recommendation of the FAQ: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianAMD64Faq#line-95 but
independent architecture packages (common.dev, dev.dev and debian.tar.gz) are
a different size.
The content is the same, it's
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:57:39PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:07:11 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-14, 15:41:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
the example in the New Maintainers'
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:39 AM, James Stuckey jhstuc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm interested in learning more about development/packaging on Debian.
I've
downloaded some source to package, ran dh_make on it, and now I'm trying
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM, James Stuckey jhstuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:39 AM, James Stuckey jhstuc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm interested in learning more about development/packaging on Debian.
Hi mentors!
I have packaged a new upstream version (0.13) of package gurlchecker
which is already in debian sid (version 0.11.2) . The debdiff from the
sid package to the new one can be found here:-
http://expatsinksa.com/gurlchecker_0.13-1.debdiff
I am looking for sponsors for
the package, as
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-16, 12:57:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
the example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I moved the man
pages upstream I got a bug report because the location of docbook.xsl
isn't consistent across OSs
Just
* Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org, 2010-05-16, 21:44:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
the example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I moved the man
pages upstream I got a bug report because the location of
docbook.xsl isn't consistent across OSs
Just use
Chris,
In debian/copyright
* please replace:
This work was packaged for Debian by:
Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr on Thu, 12 May 2010
20:45:18 +
This package was debianized by Joop Stakenborg pa3...@debian.org on Tue,
21
Feb 2006 23:36:14 +0100
with:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 03:16:13PM +0200, James Stuckey wrote:
So I'm not able to have debian-multimedia in my sources when I use
pbuilder?
You can have it.
I commented out the dmm line from my sources, and then deleted it, and I'm
still getting the same error from pbuilder.
Have you
Nicolas Joseph nicolas.jos...@valaide.org writes:
Hello,
I try to build a package for i386 and amd64. I cross-build the i386 package
with
the recommendation of the FAQ: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianAMD64Faq#line-95
but
independent architecture packages (common.dev, dev.dev and
Maybe but debarchiver reject my upload because the file is already added and has
a different md5 sum.
how do you do for real repositories?
2010/5/16 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
Nicolas Joseph nicolas.jos...@valaide.org writes:
Hello,
I try to build a package for i386 and amd64.
On Sun, 16 May 2010 21:44:42 +0900
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
override_dh_auto_build:
xsltproc --nonet \
--param make.year.ranges 1 \
--param make.single.year.ranges 1 \
--param
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-16, 16:06:
override_dh_auto_build:
xsltproc --nonet \
--param make.year.ranges 1 \
--param make.single.year.ranges 1 \
--param man.charmap.use.subset 0 \
Jakub Wilk writes:
Hi,
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-16, 16:06:
override_dh_auto_build:
xsltproc --nonet \
--param make.year.ranges 1 \
--param make.single.year.ranges 1 \
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared to
those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect big wins here ;-)
AFAICT
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared to
those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect
George Danchev writes:
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared
to those pulled in the
* George Danchev danc...@spnet.net, 2010-05-16, 20:51:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as
compared to those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect big wins
here ;-)
AFAICT the above trio don't
On Sun, 16 May 2010 20:51:45 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the
Jakub Wilk writes:
* George Danchev danc...@spnet.net, 2010-05-16, 20:51:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as
compared to those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect big wins
here ;-)
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 20:51:45 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 04:12:20PM +0200, Nicolas Joseph wrote:
Maybe but debarchiver reject my upload because the file is already added and
has
a different md5 sum.
how do you do for real repositories?
You don't upload the same package version twice. If you need to update,
bump the
This is not me, I use dput.
Should I delete manually packages in the .change file?
2010/5/16 Matthew Palmer mpal...@debian.org:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 04:12:20PM +0200, Nicolas Joseph wrote:
Maybe but debarchiver reject my upload because the file is already added and
has
a different md5
Dear mentors,
in the course of renovating an older package, prior to
adopting it, I ran into a calamity. On the one hand the
source files are individually lisensed as GPL-1+, while
on the other hand 'debian/copyright' is claiming GPL-2+,
and Lintian is complaining about the symlink-license GPL.
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se writes:
in the course of renovating an older package, prior to
adopting it, I ran into a calamity. On the one hand the
source files are individually lisensed as GPL-1+, while
on the other hand 'debian/copyright' is claiming GPL-2+,
and
Nicolas Joseph nicolas.jos...@valaide.org writes:
Maybe but debarchiver reject my upload because the file is already added and
has
a different md5 sum.
how do you do for real repositories?
2010/5/16 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
Nicolas Joseph nicolas.jos...@valaide.org writes:
28 matches
Mail list logo
