Hi,
On Freitag, 11. Februar 2011, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
My motivation for maintaining this package is: It's yet another the FLV
tool which related to my current job.
And do you really plan to support it for the next, say, 5 years? And why does
Debian need yet another tool like this? Sounds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/11 04:12, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Harald Dunkel ha...@afaics.de wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for blockade. Its a sokoban-like
XWindow game. The game itself is public domain, but most of
the the levels
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 04:31:42PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
uscan reports a newer version of the package:
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
http://code.google.com/p/flvmeta/downloads/list
- The CFLAGS in d/rules overrides flags set by dpkg-buildflags, which
makes it more difficult to rebuild the package with different default
flags (see man dpkg-buildflags).
I see that the example in the Debian policy on build options [1] also
overrides the flags set by dpkg-buildflags.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
* debian/control:
- The appropriate section should be video, not utils.
See its friends here:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/video/
- Vcs-Svn is currently pointing to upstream VCS. But this field is for
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:39:53AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Freitag, 11. Februar 2011, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
My motivation for maintaining this package is: It's yet another the FLV
tool which related to my current job.
And do you really plan to support it for the next, say, 5
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Harald Dunkel ha...@afaics.de wrote:
Both options would imply to host a new source tree somewhere. Which
hoster would you suggest?
This is a topic I would like to bring up at the upcoming Debian games
team meeting in March:
Dear mentors,
I have uploaded the package that has been updated as the comments mention
before.
Thanks to Paul Tagliamonte,
* debian/watch:
- Adjust the url to scan only upstream stable version.
* debian/rules:
- Remove the comments from the top.
Thanks to Theppitak
Hi Neutron,
On Samstag, 12. Februar 2011, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
Hi, good to see you :)
likewise!
Sorry for my English (It's T-English {Thai + English} :P)
No problem, almost everybody here is learning english as well. Me too
certainly :)
I didn't really doubt your good intentions, I just
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Neutron Soutmun neo.neut...@gmail.com wrote:
I have uploaded the package that has been updated as the comments mention
before.
Looks good! Just some more things I have just noticed, though:
debian/copyright:
- In the Format field, it should be a versioned
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:32:24PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
Looks good! Just some more things I have just noticed, though:
debian/copyright:
- In the Format field, it should be a versioned URL, not the plain
DEP-5 URL, so it indicates which revision of the format it refers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-12 11:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
- The CFLAGS in d/rules overrides flags set by dpkg-buildflags, which
makes it more difficult to rebuild the package with different default
flags (see man dpkg-buildflags).
I see that the example
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Neutron Soutmun neo.neut...@gmail.com wrote:
- Adjust the Source field URL to point to the stable version download list.
No need to be that specific. The copyright file is to provide info of
the source download site. It can cover all versions you are going
to
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 08:41:55PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Neutron Soutmun neo.neut...@gmail.com
wrote:
- Adjust the Source field URL to point to the stable version download
list.
No need to be that specific. The copyright file is to
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Neutron Soutmun neo.neut...@gmail.com wrote:
Reverted and uploaded, please review again.
I would be glad if you uploaded this package for me.
Good job! Uploaded.
Cheers!
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21.1-1
of my package roxterm.
It builds these binary packages:
roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lastfmlib.
* Package name: lastfmlib
Version : 0.4.0-1
Upstream Author : Dirk Vander Boer
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/lastfmlib/
* License : GPL-2
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-02-12 11:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
- The CFLAGS in d/rules overrides flags set by dpkg-buildflags, which
makes it more difficult to rebuild the package with different
* Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl [110212 11:24]:
- The CFLAGS in d/rules overrides flags set by dpkg-buildflags, which
makes it more difficult to rebuild the package with different default
flags (see man dpkg-buildflags).
I see that the example in the Debian policy on build options
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 06:27:34PM +, james frize wrote:
Thanks Etienne,
I think I'm starting to get it now, I'll have to read a bit more on
how a makefile works before my next attempt, all this binary target
stuff is confusing me.
debian/rules is a Makefile which has several targets
I'm trying to build my first deb package and I've hit a problem,
I don't understand how the permissions work, I've just started using
fakeroot for running: fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -F, but now my
package won't compile anymore, how exactly do I get the files
installed in /usr/share or
Thanks for all you time helping to explain how this stuff works, I
really appreciate it, I find most of the documentation on this subject
pretty heavy reading and extremely difficult to learn from.
You'll be pleased to know I've started to use fakeroot instead of sudo
for the packaging
Cheers
continued
(sorry accidental button press!)
As I was saying:
I'm trying to build my first deb package and I've hit a problem,
I don't understand how the permissions work, I've just started using
fakeroot for running: fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -F, but now my
package won't compile anymore,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.6+darcs101112-1
of my package gts.
It builds these binary packages:
libgts-0.7-5 - library to deal with 3D computational surface meshes
libgts-bin - utility binaries for libgts
libgts-dbg - debugging symbols for libgts
libgts-dev -
Am Sonntag, den 13.02.2011, 00:17 + schrieb Jim sonodrome:
I'm trying to build my first deb package and I've hit a problem,
I don't understand how the permissions work, I've just started using
fakeroot for running: fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -F, but now my
package won't compile anymore,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2010.09.01-1
of my package gambit.
It builds these binary packages:
gambit - game theory software and tools
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 450298, 519780, 561254
The package can be
26 matches
Mail list logo
