Re: /usr/lib64 or /usr/lib

2011-06-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: On 2011-06-11 09:22 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Except for how dpkg behaves. If your package has a file in /usr/lib64/ and gets installed then dpkg records that that directory belongs to your package. Then the next time libc6 gets updated dpkg will

Re: ia32-libs-dev build dependency vs. Ubuntu

2011-06-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Gregor Jasny gja...@googlemail.com writes: Hello, I'm the maintainer of v4l-utils and ran into the following problem: The last v4l-utils Debian package added a build dependency to libjpeg, and because I also build 32bit libs on amd64 (for Skype) I had to add an build dependency on

Re: How to make a meta package unremovable?

2011-06-13 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 22:54, Erik Schanze (Debian) schan...@gmx.de wrote: Does anybody have an additionally idea how to solve this, to prevent the removal of one package without hanging on user input and prevent automatic inclusion in PBuilder installation? With my APT hat on i can tell you

Re: /usr/lib64 or /usr/lib

2011-06-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-06-13 12:11 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: On 2011-06-11 09:22 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Except for how dpkg behaves. If your package has a file in /usr/lib64/ and gets installed then dpkg records that that directory belongs to your

Re: How to make a meta package unremovable?

2011-06-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 22:54, Erik Schanze (Debian) schan...@gmx.de wrote: Does anybody have an additionally idea how to solve this, to prevent the removal of one package without hanging on user input and prevent automatic inclusion in PBuilder

Re: ITA-RFS: cronolog - logfile rotator

2011-06-13 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes: It appear to be lintian clean. and can be found here: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=cronolog http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cronolog/cronolog_1.6.2-6.dsc It seems the .orig.tar.gz of your upload

Re: How to make a meta package unremovable?

2011-06-13 Thread David Kalnischkies
2011/6/13 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org: David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com writes: What could be done is tweaking resolver scoring points, but honestly: that is black-magic even for me -- and as you can only change this for priorities it has side-effects for other packages with

Re: How to make a meta package unremovable?

2011-06-13 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi, On 2011-06-13 12:56, David Kalnischkies wrote: With my APT hat on i can tell you that APT (and friends) currently have no option to forbid the removal of packages without other side-effects. Please refrain from uncondionally stating something about friends' functionality. Libcupt actually

Re: Stripping non-free/unnecessary files out of orig.tar.gz

2011-06-13 Thread Paul Gevers
On 06/12/11 19:13, Anton Martchukov wrote: Hello All. In my package (opencpn) there are couple of binary files without source code/with unfree license that is required only for OS X and Windows builds (those are some dlls and redistributable files). Upstream does like to keep them in

Re: ITA-RFS: cronolog - logfile rotator

2011-06-13 Thread Maxime Chatelle
On 06/13/2011 14:58:07, Christoph Egger wrote: Hi! Hi ! thanks for reply. It seems the .orig.tar.gz of your upload to mentors.debian.net differs From the one in the archive. Did you modify the tarball? where did you get it from? Please use the tarball currently in the archive (and if

Re: ITA-RFS: cronolog - logfile rotator

2011-06-13 Thread Christoph Egger
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes: It appear to be lintian clean. and can be found here: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=cronolog http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cronolog/cronolog_1.6.2-6.dsc

Re: Stripping non-free/unnecessary files out of orig.tar.gz

2011-06-13 Thread Ove Kåven
Den 12. juni 2011 19:13, skrev Anton Martchukov: In my package (opencpn) there are couple of binary files without source code/with unfree license that is required only for OS X and Windows builds (those are some dlls and redistributable files). Upstream does like to keep them in original

Re: ITA-RFS: cronolog - logfile rotator

2011-06-13 Thread Maxime Chatelle
On 06/13/2011 21:42:14, Christoph Egger wrote: ... Ah I see where that comes from. Those packages with tarball-in- tarball are rather rare these days. Changing the tarball without renaming it won't technically work however. You can still rename the tarball to something like

Re: RFS: gogglesmm

2011-06-13 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Hendrik Rittich wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gogglesmm. * Package name: gogglesmm Version : 0.12.2-5 Upstream Author : Hendrik Rittich hendrik.ritt...@gmx.de * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gogglesmm/ * License

Re: RFS: freeplane (updated package)

2011-06-13 Thread tony mancill
On 06/08/2011 07:58 AM, Eric Lavarde wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-1 of my package freeplane. It builds these binary packages: freeplane - Java program to create and edit mind maps. libjortho-freeplane-java - Java spell-checking library.

Re: RFS: micro-evtd (updated package)

2011-06-13 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On 06/11/2011 03:24 PM, Ryan Tandy wrote: Dear mentors and ARM porters, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.4-1 of my package micro-evtd. It builds these binary packages: micro-evtd - Linkstation Pro/Kurobox Pro special features support micro-evtd-udeb - Linkstation Pro/Kurobox

Re: ITA-RFS: cronolog - logfile rotator

2011-06-13 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:56:00 +0200 Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com wrote: Ah I see where that comes from. Those packages with tarball-in- tarball are rather rare these days. Changing the tarball without renaming it won't technically work however. You can still rename the tarball to