On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
Tarball only
Branches
NameLocal/RemoteMerges From Tracks
-
master local n/a
Reuploaded a new version comments online
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Bastien,
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 07:50 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
Please do not upload directly, i will upload git tree before under
collab maint and postthe final ppackage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karl,
On 08.07.2011 05:49, Karl Goetz wrote:
- The -I and --pedantic options should always be used.
Why is that? the manual entry for --pedantic says
Pedantic tags are Lintian at its most pickiest and
include checks for
Le Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Arno Töll a écrit :
That said, some pedantic tags can probably be ignored but most are
nonetheless still a very helpful addition one better should consider
when packaging software.
Hello everybody,
I would like to add that in my experience, an
Luis,
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 23:12 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xxxterm.
* Package name: xxxterm
Version : 1.399-1
Upstream Author : Marco Peereboom ma...@peereboom.us, Stevan Andjelkovic
ste...@student.chalmers.se,
Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 11:13:53, Arno Töll a écrit :
Hi Karl,
On 08.07.2011 05:49, Karl Goetz wrote:
- The -I and --pedantic options should always be used.
Why is that? the manual entry for --pedantic says
Pedantic tags are Lintian at its most pickiest and
Hi!
While I'm not looking for a sponsor for my package, git-flow, I would
appreciate any comments regarding the packaging, and all ideas for
improvement.
* Package name: git-flow
Version : 0.4.1-1~preview0
Upstream Author : Vincent Driessen vinc...@datafox.nl,
* Fabrizio Regalli fab...@fabreg.it [110707 21:22]:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.10-1
of my package flush.
Some 'LDFLAGS += -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed' should help to get
the depedency list a bit shortened.
Ok, I can add this flags.
Please do not add
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:58 +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package usb-imagewriter.
* Package name: usb-imagewriter
Version : 0.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com
* URL :
Hi Kilian,
Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org writes:
Having a look at your package I find:
First of all, thanks a lot for looking at the package! Later today I
will go through your comments, make all the changes your suggesting and
update the package at mentors.
A few comments below.
1.
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:03 +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:58 +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package usb-imagewriter.
* Package name: usb-imagewriter
Version : 0.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Oliver
Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 12:55:52, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
[SNIP]
Don't get me wrong, in my opinion (some of) these things are good. But
making a big fuss about them is not helping anybody. It only distracts
attention from things that are important, and creates false impression
that they
Hello Kilian
Also thanks to you for taking the time to review this package.
The new package source is uploaded.
looking closer at your package I find the following:
1. It's an intial upload to Debian AFAICT. Yet your debian/changelog is
cluttered with a number of entries already. For
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Dear reviewers, next time if you are going to complain about:
- debian/compat being too low;
There are cases where it should be bumped [1], support for old
versions gets removed. Many sponsors take the approach What should be
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0-5
of my package nullidentd.
It builds these binary packages:
nullidentd - small, fast identd daemon
Here is the ‘lintian’ commandline I ran, and its output:
$ lintian -IE --pedantic
I: nullidentd source:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Don't get me wrong, in my opinion (some of) these things are good. But
making a big fuss about them is not helping anybody. It only distracts
attention from things that are important, and creates false impression that
they are
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:47:31 -0400, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
- debian/copyright not in DEP-5 format;
This is accepted and will be policy soon [3]. What should be done
eventually must be done immediately.
I think you might misunderstand the DEP process, which is easy to
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:55 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
(I'm creating a new thread rather than replying to a particular
message, because my mail is not at all personal. It's a general
tendency amongst many debian-mentors reviewers that I'm going to
rant about.)
A sponsor on 2011-07-08, 11:22
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08.07.2011 15:56, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
1. You're using debhelper compat 7 and also only debhelper =
7.0.50~ as Build-Depends. Please bump that to 8
Seriously? Is the sponsor suggesting that one should be
build-depending on a newer version,
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:40:46 +0200, Jeroen Schot wrote:
Here is the ‘lintian’ commandline I ran, and its output:
Thank you for providing this information!
$ lintian -IE --pedantic
I: nullidentd source: quilt-patch-missing-description 01_random_usernames.diff
I: nullidentd source:
Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
- debian/copyright not in DEP-5 format;
This is accepted and will be policy soon [3]. What should be done
eventually must be done immediately.
It will be in Policy and maintained via
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 04:31:49PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
On 08.07.2011 15:56, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
I can understand how this applies to older packages that have been created
in
the past and just don't use some of the new functionality, but I guess that
the points are valid for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
On 08.07.2011 18:24, Adam Borowski wrote:
If you don't make use of newest shiniest features, higher debhelper levels
just make backporting harder for no gain.
There is debhelper 8 in both, lenny-backports as well as in
squeeze-backports.
On 07/07/2011 10:43 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
There is one lintian warning:
I: libpar2-0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libpar2.so.0.0.1
Ups, yes. Symbols file added.
Two cppcheck warnings:
[libpar2.h:29]: (error) Memory leak: LibPar2::par1Repairer
[libpar2.h:30]: (error) Memory leak:
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:05:05PM +0200, Sebastian H. wrote:
[...]
2. Your debian/watch doesn't work. Yield remote version -0.12.0
[...]
The whole point for the 0.12.1 release was to make Debian
integration smoother. Since most things seem to work now I've
uploaded the tarball
Hi,
Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org writes:
Having a look at your package I find:
Ok, so I re-worked the package and uploaded a new version into mentors:
dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xxxterm/xxxterm_1.399-1.dsc
I tried to follow all the advices, a few comments follow.
Hi Jakub, hi all,
[...] (whether or not to request bumping debhelper compat; I do agree with the
technical arguments put forward by Jakub, but that's not the focus of my reply)
The obvious provocative answer is: Nitpicking is the way to go. As always,
however, there's more than black and white
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:35:41PM +0200, Andreas Moog wrote:
On 07/07/2011 10:43 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
There is one lintian warning:
I: libpar2-0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libpar2.so.0.0.1
Ups, yes. Symbols file added.
[...]
Thanks for checking the package, a new
Hello Jörn,
I have packaged xnoise without any lintian errors/warnings. Very good
work. Unfortunately I am not a DD. So you must search further for an
sponsor.
One tip: Instead of using in debian/rules:
override_dh_installman:
dh_installman debian/xnoise.1
it is better creating a file
Hi,
Nice topic, thanks to Jakub for having the good idea to have started it.
On 07/08/2011 08:47 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
Right now, the general consensus is the dh and cdbs produce
debian packages that are easier to maintain in the long run (if the
sponsor has to take over maintenance of the
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:55 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
[...] but should be made explicit as the reasons not to use dh, for
example, might mean that the helper is lacking functionality or
behaves buggy in certain situations.
I don't get it here...
Do you think that debian/rules calling
Hi Adam,
On 08.07.2011 18:24, Adam Borowski wrote:
If you don't make use of newest shiniest features, higher debhelper
levels
just make backporting harder for no gain.
There is debhelper 8 in both, lenny-backports as well as in
squeeze-backports.
Moreover Debian packages target Sid,
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:55 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
[...] but should be made explicit as the reasons not to use dh, for
example, might mean that the helper is lacking functionality or
behaves buggy in certain situations.
I don't get it here...
On 08/07/11 22:23, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 07/08/2011 08:47 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
Right now, the general consensus is the dh and cdbs produce
debian packages that are easier to maintain in the long run (if the
sponsor has to take over maintenance of the package or if NMUs are
required in
On 07/08/2011 12:29 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
On 08.07.2011 18:24, Adam Borowski wrote:
If you don't make use of newest shiniest features, higher debhelper
levels
just make backporting harder for no gain.
There is debhelper 8 in both, lenny-backports as well as in
squeeze-backports.
There's no
On 07/08/2011 09:31 PM, Kilian Krause wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:35:41PM +0200, Andreas Moog wrote:
On 07/07/2011 10:43 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
There is one lintian warning:
I: libpar2-0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libpar2.so.0.0.1
Ups, yes. Symbols file added.
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 12:41:09 AM Leo costela Antunes wrote:
On 08/07/11 22:23, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 07/08/2011 08:47 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
Right now, the general consensus is the dh and cdbs produce
debian packages that are easier to maintain in the long run (if the
sponsor
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 04:23:05AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 07/08/2011 08:47 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
Right now, the general consensus is the dh and cdbs produce
debian packages that are easier to maintain in the long run (if the
sponsor has to take over maintenance of the package or
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:32:20 +0200
Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.fr wrote:
Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 11:13:53, Arno Töll a écrit :
Hi Karl,
On 08.07.2011 05:49, Karl Goetz wrote:
- The -I and --pedantic options should always be used.
Why is that? the manual entry for
Scott Howard wrote:
From the debhelper manpage
Unless otherwise indicated, all debhelper documentation assumes that
you are using the most recent compatibility level, and in most cases
does not indicate if the behavior is different in an earlier
compatibility level, so if you are not using
40 matches
Mail list logo
