Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cherrytree". (I haven't
gotten a single reply in a week since my first RFS request, so I'm
sending this out again.)
* Package name: cherrytree
Version : 0.23.1-1
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Penone
* URL : http:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Paul Elliott
wrote:
>
>
> Is it possible to write a watch file for a case when the url is raw text in
> the web page but not in a link, that is, no href?
>
> This web page contains the pointer to the file:
>
> http://www.openastro.org/?Download
>
> which is
>
> htt
Hi,
Sorry for the delay.
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Thanks, this is consistent with my understanding. Could you please update
> the patch header?
[... two other nice suggestions snipped ...]
I've put up an uploaded package incorporating your suggestions at
-
http://alioth.debian.org/~jrnieder-guest/
Is it possible to write a watch file for a case when the url is raw text in the
web page but not in a link, that is, no href?
This web page contains the pointer to the file:
http://www.openastro.org/?Download
which is
https://launchpad.net/~pellesimon/+archive/+files/openastro.org_1.1.25.orig
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fizsh".
* Package name: fizsh
Version : 1.0.4-1
Upstream Author : Guido van Steen (myself)
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fizsh/
* License : Modified BSD License
Section : shells
To
Andrea Bolognani writes:
> This doesn’t completely disprove your point, though. Truth is, most DVCS
> are no more different from one another than different imperative
> programming languages are, and programmers constantly move from a
> project using a certain language to another using a differen
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:43:35 +0200, Guido van Steen wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I maintain a package called fizsh. Fizsh only depends on zsh.
>
> [..]
>
> If I build the package with "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us" I
> get the following warning:
>
> "dh_pysupport: This program is deprecated,
Sorry for being a bit unclear.
Instead of:
> It is not completely clear to me why get this warning. Why do I do NOT
> need Python to build the package? Is python needed for debhelper? In
> that case should python not be included as a build-depend as well?
I meant:
> It is not completely clear t
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-pie".
>
> * Package name: gnome-pie
>Version : 0.2+gitdfdad95-1
>Upstream Author : Simon Schneegans
> * URL : http://gnome-pie.simonschneegans.de
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-pie".
* Package name: gnome-pie
Version : 0.2+gitdfdad95-1
Upstream Author : Simon Schneegans
* URL : http://gnome-pie.simonschneegans.de/
* License : GPL-3.0+
Section : gnome
It b
On Oct 20, 2011, at 08:48 AM, Alex Chiang wrote:
>The lowest common denominator is patch(1).
>
>So all you really need to know how to do is use the upstream's
>tool to obtain the source:
>
> git clone
> bzr branch
> svn co
> etc.
>
>Then, you can import the source into your
Alex Chiang writes:
> The lowest common denominator is patch(1).
>
> So all you really need to know how to do is use the upstream's
> tool to obtain the source:
>
> git clone
> bzr branch
> svn co
> etc.
Even better, at least in Debian's case, there's debcheckout(1). It h
Le jeudi, 20 octobre 2011 17.30:40, Marco Balmer a écrit :
> Thanks Didier for checking my package. Make test (testing suite) runs not
> proper at the moment. I disabled it and re-uploaded the package:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/fadecut
Thanks; uploaded !
Cheers,
OdyX
signature.asc
De
* Barry Warsaw :
> On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> >For example I might stop putting off the Mailman stuff I
> >promised to work on (porting the Indymedia patchset to mailman
> >3) if it wasn't using bzr.
>
> That does make me sad.
>
> If you contribute in general to open sour
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:42:31PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> I just built it and although it built correctly (buildlog attached), I think
> there are some things that should be changed: There are many
> mkdir: cannot create directory `/sbuild-nonexistent': Permission denied"
> those indic
On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>I think people tend not to contribute at all to projects using a VCS
>they don't like.
I still contribute to Python .
>For example I might stop putting off the Mailman stuff I promised to
>work on (porting the Indymedia patchset to mailman 3) if it
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I also think that Bazaar is easy enough to learn for both experienced and
> inexperienced developers/dvcs users. I can't think of a single contributor to
> e.g. GNU Mailman or python-mode.el that has told me they won't contribute just
> beca
On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>Not getting into any war, but it seems 90% of everyone thinks Git is a way
>better than BZR, and that the 10% that remains are BZR extremists. Since
>VCS is all about sharing your sources (unless you don't care about others
>and sees it as only
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:34:31AM +0100, Roger Light wrote:
> I think it's more like "100% of people prefer the DVCS they use first
> because anything after that is different".
False. I started off with Bazaar, used it happily for a couple years,
then moved everything to Git because I liked it b
Le vendredi, 14 octobre 2011 11.31:25, Marco Balmer a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for a my new debian package:
>
> * Package name: aspsms-t
Hi Marco, and thanks for this new package, indeed probably useful (too) to
have in Debian !
So here's my review:
* debia
Le vendredi, 14 octobre 2011 11.40:16, Marco Balmer a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for a my new debian package:
>
> * Package name: jabber-querybot
Hi Marco, and thanks for this new package, indeed probably useful to have in
Debian !
Now on for the review:
* the
buildprocess; it really should.
Cheers,
--
OdyX
fadecut_0.1.1-1-amd64-20111020-1422.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Russ Allbery writes:
> Roger Light writes:
>
> > I think it's more like "100% of people prefer the DVCS they use first
> > because anything after that is different".
>
> Nope. Used svk first, then arch, then used bzr extensively for a while,
> and then learned Git and switched everything else o
* Jonathan Nieder , 2011-10-20, 05:38:
Resolution of unversioned symbols seems (though I haven't found time
to check carefully yet) to happen on a first-library-mapped-wins
basis.
[snip]
In the cases where the actual result is "v2, v2" instead of one
implementation being used directly and anoth
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jonathan Nieder , 2011-10-17, 23:49:
> | Unfortunately one cannot even get lucky and find the symbol from
> | liblzma2 used from time to time: versioned symbols take precedence over
> | unversioned ones when resolving unversioned references.
>
> As far as I can tell, this is
* Ruben Molina , 2011-10-19, 20:57:
Your package doesn't respect DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt. Please
consider using dpkg-buildflags to fix this issue. :)
Thanks. I added dpkg-dev to Build-Depends, included
/usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk, and addded a DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS=1
in debian/rules
Hmm, y
Roger Light writes:
> I think it's more like "100% of people prefer the DVCS they use first
> because anything after that is different".
Nope. Used svk first, then arch, then used bzr extensively for a while,
and then learned Git and switched everything else over to it as soon as
possible.
--
Paul Wise writes:
> Best file a couple of bugs about that on autoconf upstream:
> Please implement autoreconf -jX
> Please implement ./configure -jX
Autoconf upstream has already considered parallel configure. My
impression of that dicussion is that there's just no way it will happen,
at least
28 matches
Mail list logo
