Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes: I see the point of having one source package for all the tools, but you could still make several binary packages from there (as alsa-tools does, though not for every single utility I must admit). What's the size of these packages? what's their

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, What's the size of these packages? what's their dependencies? qasmixer is 1400 kB (give or take), and is around 230 kB. You can see their dependency with 'apt-cache depends qasmixer qasconfig'. A quick look from here looks like they are qtgui apps that uses libasound ? So? It's

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote: So? It's difficult for me to get your point when you're asking questions without making any statement. I'd be grateful if you could clarify. Hi Depending on the answers, my statements would be different. In general, I see to 'primary'

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Sebastian H.
I haven't looked into the details, but I don't think you need to patch your CMakelists.txt at all. Simply use debian/${package}.install files to tell debhelper which files belong to which binary package (see dh_install(1)). That's looks even easier. But together with the manpage fixes I

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Sebastian H.
Am 13.12.2011 20:22, schrieb Sune Vuorela: On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote: Sebastian H. wrote: Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an improvement forcing users to install

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2011-12-14, Sebastian H. va...@gmx.de wrote: I've made a quick build. qastools-common_0.16.1-1_all.deb 23988 bytes qastools-qasconfig_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 61768 bytes qastools-qashctl_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 274986 bytes qastools-qasmixer_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 309520 bytes versus

RFS: fonts-play

2011-12-14 Thread Martin Erik Werner
Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fonts-play. My reason for packaging this font is that the game Red Eclipse (ITPed by me) utilises it, and I plan on using fonts-play as a (build-(long story))dependency for redeclipse-data. * Package name: fonts-play

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Benoît Knecht
Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote: So? It's difficult for me to get your point when you're asking questions without making any statement. I'd be grateful if you could clarify. Depending on the answers, my statements would be different. In

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Sebastian H.
A few comments about your man pages: - Your .TH line is wrong (you shouldn't use the command name and section number a second time after the date); have a look at /usr/share/man/man7/man-pages.7.gz for a better example. - qasconfig and qashctl don't take any options; please

DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains

2011-12-14 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi guys, I've got a unknown-copyright-format-uri Lintian complain for a versioned DEP-5 URI like: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/?pathrev=220 but a URI like: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?rev=220 passes through, although that URI gets redirected to:

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Benoît Knecht
Sebastian H. wrote: A few comments about your man pages: - Your .TH line is wrong (you shouldn't use the command name and section number a second time after the date); have a look at /usr/share/man/man7/man-pages.7.gz for a better example. - qasconfig and qashctl don't

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Sebastian H.
So? It's difficult for me to get your point when you're asking questions without making any statement. I'd be grateful if you could clarify. Depending on the answers, my statements would be different. In general, I see to 'primary' reasons for a package split in a package with kind of

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: fonts-play

2011-12-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
(CC'ing you just in case, though I think you're subscribed to pkg-fonts-devel) Quoting Martin Erik Werner (martinerikwer...@gmail.com): Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fonts-play. I added it to my TODO list as I'm now sponsoring most of the font

Re: RFS: qastools

2011-12-14 Thread Sebastian H.
A few comments about your man pages: - Your .TH line is wrong (you shouldn't use the command name and section number a second time after the date); have a look at /usr/share/man/man7/man-pages.7.gz for a better example. - qasconfig and qashctl don't take any options; please

RFS: wmweather+

2011-12-14 Thread Martin Stigge
Dear mentors, Since my usual sponsor (martin f. krafft) seems to be busy these days I will broaden this RFS and am looking for a sponsor for my package wmweather+. * Package name: wmweather+ Version : 2.13-1 Upstream Author : Brad Jorsch * URL :

Re: Bug#620960: RFS: inspircd

2011-12-14 Thread Guillaume Delacour
Le samedi 03 décembre 2011 à 11:39 +0100, Jan Lübbe a écrit : Hi! Hi, On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 22:00 +0100, Guillaume Delacour wrote: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/inspircd Alternatively, one

RFS: nanoflann

2011-12-14 Thread Jose Luis Blanco
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nanoflann, for which I'm also the upstream author. This is its basic info: * Package name: nanoflann Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Jose Luis Blanco Claraco joseluisblan...@gmail.com * URL :

Re: DEP-5 versioned URI / Lintian complains

2011-12-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com writes: For the very next of my commits, 1) what URI should I give to the very next commits, and should I just just disregard the Lintian complain For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an unversioned URL, since so far as I can tell there

Re: RFS: php-xml-beautifier

2011-12-14 Thread Mathias Ertl
Hi! On Friday, December 09, 2011 09:15:54 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/09/2011 08:46 PM, Mathias Ertl wrote: I already joined the mailinglist there and enjoy the spam that comes in there every day ;-). I did however file a join-request on their Alioth homepage. I can only hope they

Re: RFS: v3c-2.4.0-01

2011-12-14 Thread Philip Ashmore
On 13/12/11 23:30, Etienne Millon wrote: * Philip Ashmorecont...@philipashmore.com [111214 00:08]: I've filed an ITP against WNPP for this package. I've also uploaded my packages to mentors.debian.net. The dsc file is: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/v3c/v3c_2.4.0-01-1.dsc

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: fonts-play

2011-12-14 Thread Paul Wise
There is a precompiled Windows binary in the source package: tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe I note a lot of the tools refer to /usr/local/bin/fontforge, that should be changed to using env or /usr/bin/fontforge I wonder if the tools should be packaged separately since future Google fonts

Re: RFS: php-xml-beautifier

2011-12-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/15/2011 07:44 AM, Mathias Ertl wrote: [...] I am still looking for a sponsor of the package. For easy reference, here is the git-repo: https://git.fsinf.at/apt/php-xml-beautifier ... here is the package on mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/php-xml-beautifier and