Bug#670851: RFS: plotter/2.2-1[ITP]

2012-05-11 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, The source files are GPL-2 without or later, I just copied the wrong license header into the copyright file. Then you need to replace the (L)GPL-3 files with some GPLv2-compatible equivalent. Oh, thank you... I really messed up with the licenses, it seems ;-) . I will make a new

Bug#671896: RFS: irssi-plugin-xmpp/0.52-1 [ITA]

2012-05-11 Thread Florian Schlichting
Hi Antoine, thanks for looking at irssi-plugin-xmpp! This is looking good. Is there any way I can get a signed PGP key from you to verify this package? At least having the key from a keyserver... please find below the gpg key that I used to upload the package to mentors. It is a key that I

Bug#672133: RFS: webacula/5.5.1-1 [ITP]

2012-05-11 Thread Luca Capello
block 614554 by 672133 usertags + 614554 debian-packaging usertags + 672133 debian-packaging thanks Hi there! Adding the pkg-bacula-devel@ mailing list and the original requester to the Cc:. Please keep the pkg-bacula-devel@ mailing list in the loop. On Tue, 08 May 2012 21:09:40 +0200,

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#672133: RFS: webacula/5.5.1-1 [ITP]

2012-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 614554 by 672133 Bug #614554 [wnpp] RFP: webacula -- web interface of a Bacula backup system. 614554 was not blocked by any bugs. 614554 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 614554: 672133 usertags + 614554 debian-packaging

Bug#659120: marked as done (RFS: mha4mysql-manager/0.53-1 [ITP] -- Master High Availability Manager and Tools for MySQL)

2012-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2012 10:50:15 +0200 with message-id 871umrdrug@deep-thought.43-1.org and subject line mha4mysql-{manager,node} are in new has caused the Debian Bug report #659120, regarding RFS: mha4mysql-manager/0.53-1 [ITP] -- Master High Availability Manager and Tools for

Bug#659121: marked as done (RFS: mha4mysql-node/0.53-1 [ITP] -- Master High Availability Manager and Tools for MySQL)

2012-05-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2012 10:50:15 +0200 with message-id 871umrdrug@deep-thought.43-1.org and subject line mha4mysql-{manager,node} are in new has caused the Debian Bug report #659121, regarding RFS: mha4mysql-node/0.53-1 [ITP] -- Master High Availability Manager and Tools for MySQL

Bug#672237: RFS: vim-vimerl/1.4.1+git20120509.89111c7-1 [ITP]

2012-05-11 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Per, Per Andersson wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package vim-vimerl * Package name: vim-vimerl Version : 1.4+git20120210.89111c7-1 Upstream Author : Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez jimenezr...@gmail.com * URL : http://github.com/jimenezrick/vimerl *

Can't check signature: public key not found after package upload

2012-05-11 Thread Damien Lecan
Hello, For severals weeks (~begin of April), I'm not able to upload new packages anymore. Each time, I get : Unfortunately your package freefilesync was rejected because of the following reason: Your upload does not contain a valid signature. Output was: gpg: ... using RSA key ID

Bug#672394: RFS: ipset/6.12-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets

2012-05-11 Thread Neutron Soutmun
Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #672394 Dear mentors, As the upstream releases the new version 6.12.1 of ipset for the build system bug fix that including my proposed patch. Therefore, I'm working on this and will upload the new updated package soon. Best regards, Neutron

Bug#671896: RFS: irssi-plugin-xmpp/0.52-1 [ITA]

2012-05-11 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:05:47 +0200, Florian Schlichting fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: Hi Antoine, thanks for looking at irssi-plugin-xmpp! This is looking good. Is there any way I can get a signed PGP key from you to verify this package? At least having the key from a keyserver...

Re: Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

2012-05-11 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2012-05-09, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote: My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new package kde-gtk-config. Description : KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection first, kde configuration modules are packaged as

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

2012-05-11 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, Thank you for a reply. first, kde configuration modules are packaged as kde-config-foo Ok, I can rename binary package to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-style for example. Does it look good for you? Or have you another suggestion? second, what does it do that kde-config-gtk-style doesn't do ? It

Re: Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

2012-05-11 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2012-05-11, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote: kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to: * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications * preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications * custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications * select icon themes for Gtk applications *

RFS: presage/0.8.7-2 (updated package)

2012-05-11 Thread Matteo Vescovi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an update of my package presage. This change updates the packaging standards-version and fixes a FTBFS bug #672100. * Package name: presage Version : 0.8.7-2 Upstream Author : Matteo Vescovimatteo.vesc...@yahoo.co.uk * URL

Bug#672268: Didier Raboud o...@debian.org

2012-05-11 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, You could read the beginning of this thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115 (Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list) kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to: * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications * preview

Re: Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

2012-05-11 Thread Boris Pek
Sorry for a broken message. Here is the correct one: Hi, You could read the beginning of this thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115 (Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list)   kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:   *

Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876

2012-05-11 Thread Gergely Nagy
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes: Why the confusion? The old package is named after the ABI number in SONAME, the new one is named after the code version. Both Debian packages are called libmusicbrainz4, yet OLD: code v2.1.x, SONAME = libmusicbrainz.so.4, ABI = 4 NEW: code v4.0.x,