Dear Bart,
I could rename this package and upload it again, but I wonder if this
will be enough.
I am not really happy with packaging pre-bootstrapped versions of this package.
Preferably, I would package the complete source archive, and make it
build on the buildd system, but this requires them
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jasmine Hassan wrote:
For instance, I'm packaging Compiz 0.8.8, for MATE desktop. This, at
least initially, requires a lot of code substitutions, and quite a few
file/dir renaming. (ex.: gnome - mate, gconf - mateconf, metacity -
marco, etc.) I use a home-brewed
Hi,
According to [0], jampal has not its corresponding ITP bug. This bug is
needed because jampal has been removed from Debian.
If you want to reintroduce the package, please, could you file this ITP
bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
Hi,
According to [0], mysql-tzdata has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jasmine Hassan wrote:
For instance, I'm packaging Compiz 0.8.8, for MATE desktop. This, at
least initially, requires a lot of code substitutions, and quite a few
file/dir renaming. (ex.: gnome
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jasmine Hassan wrote:
Exactly, and gnome 2.x is no longer maintained, nor is Compiz 0.8.8,
last in release 0.8.x from April 2011
So you have no other solution than to take over upstream maintenance.
In that case, I truly believe that MATE should fork Compiz as well
and
Removed Damyan from the loop, as this no longer concerns his article
on renaming files quilt
http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/howto/quilt.html
Also check http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648022
I believe unstable should move to 0.9.x, and let me fork 0.8.8 for
MATE. I have it
* Jasmine Hassan jasmine.a...@gmail.com [121010 04:45]:
For instance, I'm packaging Compiz 0.8.8, for MATE desktop. This, at
least initially, requires a lot of code substitutions, and quite a few
file/dir renaming. (ex.: gnome - mate, gconf - mateconf, metacity -
marco, etc.) I use a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 10/10/2012 09:20, Jasmine Hassan a écrit :
I believe unstable should move to 0.9.x, and let me fork 0.8.8 for
MATE. I have it running rock solid atm, completely integrated with
marco 1.4 (metacity's replacement) as the decorator, and
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-10, 09:16:
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for sprop
(i.e. hg.suckless.org) too?
Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to Debian
copyright-format [0] this field can be free form text which means I can
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 683184 RFS: suckless-tools/38-2 [ITA]
Bug #683184 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: suckless-tools/38-2 [ITA]' from 'RFS:
suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please
On 11:03 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-10, 09:16:
Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for
sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too?
Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to Debian
copyright-format [0] this
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
With 3.0 (quilt) there usually is no unpatching (except if you use
some explicit options). So if you need to revert the names, that would
be done in the clean target instead. But I really do not see the point
of renaming files if you want to stick close
Thibaut Paumard thib...@debian.org writes:
Raphaël is right:
- you should try to collaborate with other distributions on a
*single* fork.
- your fork should not be called compiz, please pick a unique
name, such as compiz-mate or matepiz or whatever
There are no distributions.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère jmv_...@nirgal.com wrote:
Hello and thank you very much for your review!
On Sunday 07 October 2012 09:09:28 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
* I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to
unstable will follow the release of
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-10, 21:55:
suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
+ Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090)
+ Vcs-* fields now points to repository on collab-maint
* debian/copyright:
+ Converted to copyright-format 1.0.
* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2012-10-09, 02:16:
git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/phonetisaurus.git.
The ugly hack in debian/rules is indeed ugly. :)
Could you split it into multiple lines? 410 characters is really too
long.
Why is the filename between two -e expressions?
Last
* Jasmine Hassan jasmine.a...@gmail.com [121010 20:31]:
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
With 3.0 (quilt) there usually is no unpatching (except if you use
some explicit options). So if you need to revert the names, that would
be done in the clean target instead. But I really do not
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au, 2012-10-09, 15:45:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sylkserver/sylkserver_2.1.1-1.dsc
Lintian emits:
P: sylkserver: no-upstream-changelog
P: sylkserver-sounds: no-upstream-changelog
I: sylkserver:
Thibaut,
I should add that it is counter-productive and discouraging to fork the
entire compiz* family just because we can't get 0.8.8 in unstable, which
would allow me to simply bring back compiz-mate package that was dropped by
a Non-maintainer (Michael) in 0.8.4-5.1 (the pre-last update, on 27
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package apt-fast.
* Package name: apt-fast
Version : 1.7.6-1
Upstream Authors: Matt Parnell, Dominique Lasserre
* URL : https://github.com/ilikenwf/apt-fast.git
*
Il 10/10/2012 22:59, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2012-10-09, 02:16:
git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/phonetisaurus.git.
The ugly hack in debian/rules is indeed ugly. :)
I definitively agree.
I found a cleaner way to do that and applied it (by setting
Dear all,
Suppose i have a electronic magazine, So i want to translate an article
according to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ license, can
i do it?
--mohsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
while that worked flawlessly, there might be problems on a subsequent build
in the same tree, if you were renaming directories.
To fix that, I added (to the aforementioned) an override_dh_autoreconf
sequence:
post_patch:
[ -d src/new-dir ] || mv src/orig-dir src/new-dir
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
Converted to... doesn't usually play well with the freeze policy. But in
this case the required changes are small enough that hopefully the Release
Team won't mind.
Do you think I should change the Phrase like added the
On 10/08/2012 04:25 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 689980 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sweethome3d-furniture-editor
Hi Gabriele,
I am reviewing this package and will sponsor an upload once I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 690183 by 690188
Bug #690183 [wnpp] ITP: apt-fast -- shellscript wrapper for apt-get or aptitude
690183 was not blocked by any bugs.
690183 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 690183: 690188
stop
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:20:13 +
with message-id e1tmafp-0005ve...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: turses/0.1.4-1 [ITP] -- Twitter client for the
console
has caused the Debian Bug report #674109,
regarding RFS: turses/0.1.4-1 [ITP] -- Twitter client for the
the http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community list might
be better for questions like this
but if you keep the exact same license it should not be a problem.,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
moh...@pahlevanzadeh.org wrote:
Dear all,
Suppose i have a
29 matches
Mail list logo
