-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/02/13 01:17, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Scott,
thanks for adopting the package. There are a couple of
notes/questions:
Hi Anton, thanks for the review. As you can see, I'm quite new at this!
1. Why do you use compat level 8, not 9? 2. The
2013/2/25 Joachim Langenbach joachim.langenb...@engsas.de:
Without the dependencies to binary packages defined in this package (like
dependency of libengsas0-common from libengsas0), right?
I think libengsas0-common should be kept.
Also, probably 0 should be removed from its name:
Hello,
6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format.
Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a
recommendation, not a rule. Thanks.
--
WBR, Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
On 02/25/2013 07:52 AM, Joachim Langenbach wrote:
1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to stable
release. It is impossible. Use unstable instead. Also you should put
your name there.
So this stable or unstable line refers to the distribution status the package
is
On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Hello,
6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format.
Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a
recommendation, not a rule. Thanks.
Hello,
ok, agree, my typo. But I think it is desirable to ask for DEP-5 for
new
Hi,
On 02/25/2013 01:48 PM, Scott Leggett wrote:
I used compat level 8 and Standards-Version 3.9.3 because these are
the versions which dh_make automatically inserts when debianising an
application. Thanks for the heads-up regarding the new versions - I've
fixed the packaging.
For future
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package medit
* Package name: medit
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Yevgen Muntyan emunt...@users.sourceforge.net
Daniel Poelzleithner mooe...@poelzi.org
*
* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2013-02-23, 19:37:
I just sent another email further explaining the issue and pointing out
it is a general issue.
Thanks.
I think this change
* Move plugins from /usr/lib/fst/ to /usr/lib/fst/1/.
warrants updating README.Debian.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package phonetisaurus
* Package name: phonetisaurus
Version : 0.7.8-2
Upstream Author : Josef Novak josef.robert.no...@gmail.com
* URL :
Your message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:20:26 +
with message-id e1uac1i-0006mo...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: spout/1.4-1 [ITA] -- Tiny abstract black and
white 2D cave-shooter
has caused the Debian Bug report #701543,
regarding RFS: spout/1.4-1 [ITA] -- Tiny abstract black
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've got an issue with watch file usage in some software I'm trying to
package ( https://mentors.debian.net/package/compton ).
Upstream does not release tarballs, instead preferring packagers to
build straight from git. I've followed the advice
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:09:01PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote:
Hi,
I've got an issue with watch file usage in some software I'm trying to
package ( https://mentors.debian.net/package/compton ).
Upstream does not release tarballs, instead preferring packagers to
build straight from git.
12 matches
Mail list logo
