> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:14:13 +0600
> From: w...@wrar.name
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: update bug report question
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:08:08AM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have made a ITC for a package w
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:08:08AM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have made a ITC for a package with version 0.2
> Now I see that upstream has released version 0.3
>
> Can I just send a message to the ITC bug report that
> upstream has released a version 0.3 or must i do another s
Hello,
I have made a ITC for a package with version 0.2
Now I see that upstream has released version 0.3
Can I just send a message to the ITC bug report that
upstream has released a version 0.3 or must i do another step
so the ITC bug report is up to date.
Roelof
> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:17:30 +0800
> Subject: Re: cjs build error
> From: p...@debian.org
> CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>
>> When I try to port Cjs to
On 02/04/2014 08:29 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Octavio, could you create an OpenPGP key and sign your tarballs with
> it? Some links:
>
> http://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html
> https://we.riseup.net/debian/openpgp-best-practices
Hi, Paul.
Never done it before so it may take a moment, but sure
Your message dated Wed, 05 Feb 2014 04:26:17 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: linuxlogo/5.11-4 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #737208,
regarding RFS: linuxlogo/5.11-4 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> rpmlint- RPM package checker
How you intend to use this package - what is your motivation for
wanting this in Debian?
A review:
The blank line and comment in debian/watch are not needed.
Why did is the test suite disabled in
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "healpix-cxx". It is one of a suite
of three related packages providing C, C++, and Python interfaces for HEALPix
(Hierarchical Equal Area isoLati
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> As Paul said, if you download it from Github, you will need to generate the
> ./configure script first by running ./autogen.sh, so would have to be
> reflected in debian/rules; dh should help with that.
As folks on IRC said, the right opti
On 04/02/14 08:36, Roelof Wobben wrote:
When I do this in my control file.
Source: audiosum
Section: sound
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Roelof Wobben
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9.0.0), dh-autoreconf, libmhash-dev
Standards-Version: 3.9.5
Homepage: https://github.com/alvarezp/audiosum
Plea
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> When I try to port Cjs to debian testing I ran into this problem
>
> https://github.com/linuxmint/cjs/issues/5
>
> Any debian developer which wants to help me to figure out what is wrong here ?
debian-devel is not the appropriate place to se
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> What the best way to get out of this mess ?
Drop the completely unnessecary splitting into two packages. Simply
let upstream's build system install everything into the one audiosum
package.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-
On 04/02/14 09:39, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
On 02/04/2014 05:33 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
I would suggest using the official tarballs:
http://blog.alvarezp.org/desarrollos/audiosum/
If you prefer to use a copy of the git repository, you will need to
build the build system first using dh-autor
Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2014 03:02:13 +0100
with message-id <201402050302.13597.a...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Fwd: RFS: python-lepl/5.1.3-2 [ITA] -- recursive descent
parser library
has caused the Debian Bug report #726451,
regarding RFS: python-lepl/5.1.3-2 [ITA] -- recursive descen
Your message dated Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:41:47 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #728059,
regarding RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Vincent Cheng [2014-02-02 21:27 -0800]:
>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jerome Charaoui wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA256
>> >
>> > Le 2014-02-03 00:08, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
>> >> Have you tried contacting th
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Alexander,
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Alexander Bösch wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm still looking for a sponsor for this package. Axel Beckert provided me
> with very good feedback but is not responding anymore.
>
> I would appreciate if someone has time and would have
Your message dated Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:36:11 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#737550: RFS: commando/0.3.4-1.1 [RC, NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #737550,
regarding RFS: commando/0.3.4-1.1 [RC, NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rpmlint".
* Package name: rpmlint
Version : 1.5-1
Upstream Author : Frédéric Lepied
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rpmlint/
* License : GPL-2
S
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:15:41 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> recently I uploaded seqan and I admit I fail to build the package on two
> of three machines I control and use to build. Only one of these three
> amd64 machines has a big enough memory and does not die from swapping.
> When l
Hi,
recently I uploaded seqan and I admit I fail to build the package on two
of three machines I control and use to build. Only one of these three
amd64 machines has a big enough memory and does not die from swapping.
When looking at the build log of i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.
On 02/04/2014 05:33 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>
>> I would suggest using the official tarballs:
>>
>> http://blog.alvarezp.org/desarrollos/audiosum/
>>
>> If you prefer to use a copy of the git repository, you will need to
>> build the build system first using dh-autoreconf:
>>
>> http://packages.d
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:31:25 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: dcl/0.1-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #723136,
regarding RFS: dcl/0.1-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:31:25 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #723583,
regarding RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:31:25 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #723583,
regarding RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:31:25 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: dcl/0.1-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #723136,
regarding RFS: dcl/0.1-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi!
2014-02-04 Roelof Wobben :
> [...]
>
> I see this lintian errors :
>
> W: audiodup: empty-binary-package
> X: audiodup: package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files
Make sure your wrapping stuff gets installed to audiodup. You may want
to install into a temporary dir and use Debian .install files
Hello,
I try to port Audiosum.
It produces 1 binary audiosum and 1 wrapper called audiodup.
When I do this in my control file.
Source: audiosum
Section: sound
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Roelof Wobben
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9.0.0), dh-autoreconf, libmhash-dev
Standards-Version: 3.9.5
Hello,
When I try to port Cjs to debian testing I ran into this problem
https://github.com/linuxmint/cjs/issues/5
Any debian developer which wants to help me to figure out what is wrong here ?
Roelof
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.
Hallo Julian,
Great to see you steping in and lending Debian a hand.
First thing should be that you claim ownership of #726545 and change the bug
title from O: ... to ITA: (You did the first one, but not the second one.
However, the ownership has been already reverted)
Then you should regis
> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:36:04 +0800
> Subject: Re: No rule to install
> From: p...@debian.org
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>
> > I downloaded Audiosum here : https://github.com/alvarezp/audiosum/
>
> I would suggest using th
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Thank You very much for your suggestions !!
>
> Here is a link [1] to the package fixed according to your suggestions.
>
> [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/kerneltop
>
Uploaded.
Thanks for your work on Debian.
--
Liang
Hi,
I'm new to Debian Developement and want to contribute to this great project.
To start with packaging I searched an simple orphaned package. I think
vimhelp-de is a good starting point.
Now I'm searching a sponsor for helping me.
A few informations about me: I'm from Germany and 23 years o
Yes I followed the upstream. I will soon upload new version. The previous
package should not be credited to me, it is the work of Liu Qi and
Stefano Zacchiroli.
On 3 February 2014 21:12, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:34:43PM +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> > I am wor
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> I downloaded Audiosum here : https://github.com/alvarezp/audiosum/
I would suggest using the official tarballs:
http://blog.alvarezp.org/desarrollos/audiosum/
If you prefer to use a copy of the git repository, you will need to
build the bui
> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:27:45 +0800
> Subject: Re: No rule to install
> From: p...@debian.org
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
>
> > I try to port Audiosum to Debian.
>
> All of the versions of Audiosum I can find use automake so
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> I try to port Audiosum to Debian.
All of the versions of Audiosum I can find use automake so you should
not need override_dh_auto_install at all and the upstream Makefile
should support make install just fine.
Where did you download Audiosum
Hello,
I try to port Audiosum to Debian.
But I ran into the problem that it would not compile.
See this output:
dh binary
dh_testroot
dh_prep
rm -f debian/audiosum.substvars
rm -f debian/audiosum.*.debhelper
rm -rf debian/audiosum/
debian/rules override_dh_auto_install
m
Hey,
Thank You very much for your suggestions !!
Here is a link [1] to the package fixed according to your suggestions.
[1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/kerneltop
On 4 February 2014 03:42, Liang Guo wrote:
> Interesting package, this is my review:
>
> 1 upstream ships manpage, so ple
39 matches
Mail list logo
