Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Micheal Waltz eclip...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xrdp:
* Package name: xrdp
Version : 0.6.1-2
Upstream Author : Jay Sorg
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 February 2014 22:18, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Many thanks for uploading this. However, the package has been stuck in
On 9 February 2014 09:27, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 February 2014 22:18, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Many
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Bas van den Dikkenberg
b...@dikkenberg.net wrote:
Hi,
I made this packages the day i was rused to the hospital, and i uploaded the
wrong version to mentors, probably because i wasn't feeling wile and because
mentor didn't gave lintian warning i assumed it
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Moog andreas.m...@warperbbs.de wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the package rotix
* Package name: rotix
Version : 0.83-4.1
Section : text
It
Your message dated Sun, 9 Feb 2014 02:06:06 -0800
with message-id
caczd_tbo4cz7ugrrq8fnz9reht6qna2jdfqeu1atov92oke...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#738283: RFS: rotix/0.83-4.1 RC, NMU
has caused the Debian Bug report #738283,
regarding RFS: rotix/0.83-4.1 RC, NMU
to be marked as done.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 11:31:20PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Upstreams continue to disappoint me :(
I tend ending up as my own upstream a lot of the time, so I provide my
own disappointment.
Forks are a pain, but they often can be in the long run a benefit. This
is especially so if the parent
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:13:59PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
On the control file these packages are made:
cjs - Mozilla-based javascript bindings for the GNOME platform
libcjs0c - This is the shared library applications link to
libcjs-dev - This package contains the development files
Hi,
On 08/02/14 20:13, Roelof Wobben wrote:
So they have to use some sort of hack to find the files of the second package.
If this is the way Debian wants the packages, how can I do the same with dh7.
Not too sure about this part and what the actual question is...
All the parts are of a
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 23:00:49 +1100
From: csm...@debian.org
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is this really the debian way ?
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:13:59PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
On the control file these packages are made:
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 13:13:09 +0100
From: ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is this really the debian way ?
Hi,
On 08/02/14 20:13, Roelof Wobben wrote:
So they have to use some sort of hack to find the
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:33:19PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 11:31:20PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Upstreams continue to disappoint me :(
I tend ending up as my own upstream a lot of the time, so I provide my
own disappointment.
Forks are a pain, but they often can be
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2014 08:46:22 -0500
with message-id tslha889z69@mit.edu
and subject line Uploading hidapi
has caused the Debian Bug report #725749,
regarding RFS: hidapi/0.8.0~rc1+git20140201.3a66d4e+dfsg-2 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/ -V'libcjs0c (=
$(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)), libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS)' -- -c4
I don't see anything wrong here. It is not in the 'beginners end' of
library packaging, and library packaging is not
hi,
I couldn't find a short version of the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license.
- now I am using this:
Files: ./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.svg
./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.png
Copyright: 2013-2014 Robert Gibson
License: CC-BY-SA-3.0
THE WORK (AS DEFINED BELOW) IS PROVIDED UNDER THE
On 2014-02-09 16:51, Felix Natter wrote:
hi,
I couldn't find a short version of the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license.
- now I am using this:
Files: ./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.svg
./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.png
Copyright: 2013-2014 Robert Gibson
License: CC-BY-SA-3.0
Hi Niels,
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
There is no short version you can use in d/copyright - you have to
list the full license of CC-BY-SA-3.0 as it is not in common-licenses.
Though, if you have it in a stand-alone license paragraph, you can just
omit the part you showed above.
On 2014-02-09 17:29, Felix Natter wrote:
Hi Niels,
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
There is no short version you can use in d/copyright - you have to
list the full license of CC-BY-SA-3.0 as it is not in common-licenses.
Though, if you have it in a stand-alone license paragraph, you
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
Yes, to my knowledge that would be a valid d/copyright (assuming the
missing . around [...] is omitted only in this mail).
Thanks!
Best Regards,
--
Felix Natter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Your message dated Sun, 9 Feb 2014 15:30:31 -0200
with message-id
cap+dxjfmypv0bwpvsvjb2wtna1ztj5pf1unjhgxvwfn+ljk...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: RFS: htpdate/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- HTTP based time
synchronization tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #737407,
regarding RFS: htpdate/1.1.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pdfcube
* Package name: pdfcube
Version : 0.0.5-2
Upstream Author : Mirko Maischberger mirko.maischber...@gmail.com
* URL : http://code.100allora.it/pdfcube/
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
From: nos...@vuorela.dk
Subject: Re: Is this really the debian way ?
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 15:10:26 +
On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/
From: rwob...@hotmail.com
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Is this really the debian way ?
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:54:02 +
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
From: nos...@vuorela.dk
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 February 2014 09:27, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
And lintian has a fair bit to complain about:
W: 0install-core: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/0alias
W: 0install-core: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/0desktop
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libebur128
* Package name: libebur128
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Jan Kokemüller jan.kokemuel...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/jiixyj/libebur128
* License : MIT
Section :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libebur128
* Package name: libebur128
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Jan Kokemüller jan.kokemuel...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/jiixyj/libebur128
*
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 03:10:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/ -V'libcjs0c (=
$(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)), libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS)' -- -c4
In this case, it ensures that anything that links
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 12:14:17PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
I know that cjs depends on mozjs185 package.
Is there a better way to make this work ? Without the hack ?
cjs the program or libcjs0? Whichever one, add a Dependency.
As you're running objdump over a library libcjs0 to find what
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgroove
* Package name: libgroove
Version : 3.0.4-1
Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/andrewrk/libgroove
* License
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgroove
* Package name: libgroove
Version : 3.0.4-1
Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/andrewrk/libgroove
* License : MIT
Section : libs
It builds
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lebiniou
* Package name: lebiniou
Version : 3.20-1
Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel oliv...@biniou.info
* URL : http://biniou.net
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lebiniou-data
* Package name: lebiniou-data
Version : 3.11-1
Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel oliv...@biniou.info
* URL : http://biniou.net
* License
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Craig Small wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 11:31:20PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Upstreams continue to disappoint me :(
I tend ending up as my own upstream a lot of the time, so I provide my
own disappointment.
My disappointment in this case was caused by the
33 matches
Mail list logo
