On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:53:21PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
I'd like to sponsor this package as requested on SoB Wiki page but there
are several lintian issues (including errors) which would cause an
auto-reject:
Thanks for taking time to review and sorry for your time. I'll try to
According to [0], libopenshot has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
According to [0], libopenshot-audio has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
PS:
I forgot, there is a lintian informational warning which should be
fixed:
debian-news-entry-uses-asterisk
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
According to [0], pw3270 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 757180
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: owner -1 !
Control: block 763888 by -1
# indicating that I will sponsor this package
Hi Alexandre,
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 01:54 +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Hi,
cruft is orphaned (#763888), so you dont do a NMU, as technically there
is no maintainer.
Hello,
I have uploaded[1] a new version including the new upstream release.
CU
Jörg
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psocksxx/psocksxx_0.0.6-1.dsc
--
pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E
pgp Key: BE581B6E
CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56
Jörg
Please add .patch extensions to patch file names.
What's the reason for commented out lines in debian/rules?
Consider using debian/clean instead of override_dh_auto_clean target.
You shouldn't override P tags.
There are lintian messages:
I: i2util source:
Please add .patch extensions to patch file names.
You don't need debian/tmp/ prefixes in .manpages.
Please don't use .default to control whether the daemon should be started.
If you are unsure about something ask on the Debian resources, not wrote
the questions into the packaging files (this is
Hi Russ,
In the past you sponsored the initial upload of my sblim-wbemcli package
into Debian. I prepared a new revision of it with very few changes,
could you please sponsor it again?
https://mentors.debian.net/package/sblim-wbemcli
--
Thanks,
Feri.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org, 2014-10-04, 17:29:
You don't need debian/tmp/ prefixes in .manpages.
You do need them. dh_installman doesn't look into debian/tmp; only
dh_install does.
That said, if the upstream build system puts the manpages in the correct
location (which apparently
Hi,
I think that is important say you that I want help. However, the
source code is very strange because the upstream is ignoring the basic
rules.
I submitted a patch to upstream adressing licensing issues :
https://github.com/DesertBus/sockjs-twisted/pull/24
I'll wait a bit for this to be
Ok! Good luck! I will wait for you.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-10-04 11:08 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi alexandre.ro...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I think that is important say you that I want help. However, the
source code is very strange because the upstream is ignoring the basic
rules.
I submitted a
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 07:08:06PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
hi,
upstream Freeplane wants to replace the release zips/.tar.gzs because
they contain a freeplane-1.3.12_pre06/ instead of a freeplane-1.3.12/
directory. The software will be re-compiled (md5 changes), but There
will be
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have seen this before and I (as a maintainer) don't understand this
comment so bold as it is put here. I would say that overrides can help
you to see which items you (or your sponsee¹ in case of sponsorship)
already investigated.
The point
Hello,
a short question: Against which rules I violate, when no debug package
is available?
Thanks for your answer.
CU
Jörg
--
pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E
pgp Key: BE581B6E
CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56
Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54526 Niederkail
Threema:
16 matches
Mail list logo