Both of you are right, I'm fixing that.
Thank pointing me to this issues.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 08:42:00PM +0100, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Andreas Moog andreas.m...@warperbbs.de
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:43:12AM +0100, Maxime Chatelle wrote:
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:02:52 +0100 (CET)
with message-id 20141027080252.c88d7100...@bombadil.mhp
and subject line Package uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #764958,
regarding RFS: python-click/3.3-1 [ITP #764953]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:36:44 +0200
with message-id 20141027083644.ga2...@straylight.m.ringlet.net
and subject line Re: Bug#762680: RFS: wmanager/0.2.1-12 (refresh packaging)
has caused the Debian Bug report #762680,
regarding RFS: wmanager/0.2.1-12 (refresh packaging)
to be marked
Package updated upstream. And debian package too.
The respective dsc file can be found at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cronolog/cronolog_1.6.4-1.dsc
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:12:42AM +0100, xakz wrote:
Both of you are right, I'm fixing that.
Thank pointing me to this issues.
Dear Tobi,
thanks for reviewing and sponsoring! Especially the
native-vs-non-native link was quite enlightening.
A few minutes ago I uploaded the new files
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sleepenh/sleepenh_1.3-2.dsc
including the following changes:
* Fixed changelog
Andreas Moog andreas.m...@warperbbs.de writes:
It seems to be missing a build-depends on (at least) the autoconf package.
Oops. I've fixed this and set up cowbuilder to avoid future problems.
The new version is on mentors.
--
Marius Gavrilescu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[I don't intend to sponsor this package, sorry!]
* Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de, 2014-10-26, 09:01:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fuzzylite/fuzzylite_5.0+dfsg-1.dsc
codespell says:
./fuzzylite/src/term/Function.cpp:578: Oxigen == Oxygen
reopen 738101
thanks
Hello,
is there any chance for this package [1] to enter Jessie after
~1 year sitting on mentors.d.n?! (see #739247 about the
privacy-breach-google-cse lintian error)
If no, what exactly I should do?
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/awstats
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package plowshare4
Package name : plowshare4
Version : 1.0.6-1
Upstream Author : Matthieu Crapet mcra...@gmail.com
URL : https://code.google.com/p/plowshare/
Licence : GPL-3+
Section : web
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
is there any chance for this package [1] to enter Jessie after
~1 year sitting on mentors.d.n?! (see #739247 about the
privacy-breach-google-cse lintian error)
If no, what exactly I should do?
In general Debian expects sponsored
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:37:31PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
In general Debian expects sponsored package maintainers to be
proactive about finding sponsors; contacting former sponsors,
Sure, I like waste my time for Debian's bureacracy)
working on their packages
I did this for ~3 years, until
New upstream versions uploaded now generally won't get into Jessie, as
the now-required 10-day delay is longer than the time remaining before
freeze.
As the preferred way to do bug fixes during the freeze is to upload them
to unstable, having a new upstream version sitting in unstable during
Hmm, perhaps I misinterpret [1], but it says on the 5th of November
2014, and we will run one automated migration at that time.
...under the existing automated migration rules, including the 10-day
rule (so anything uploaded now won't qualify). Unlike the Wheezy
freeze, we are not planning to
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Carl Suster wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package plowshare4
I don't intend to sponsor this but here is a review.
This looks like the only thing that would block the upload:
Some of the copyright holders are missing from debian/copyright.
These
On Monday 27 October 2014 23:26:10 Paul Wise wrote:
Cannot find license text for BSD-3-clause
Bummer. That's a message coming from Software::License which cannot find
license text in the system. Software::License does not scan debian/copyright.
This message is irrelevant and must be confusing
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Although I don't know whether I should upload this change
due to the upcoming freeze
The release team might be willing to unblock such a change.
BTW, could the default for cme check dpkg not show progress/debug info?
--
bye,
pabs
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:23:50 +
with message-id e1xin5c-0001ck...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: ibus-libzhuyin/1.6.99.20140929-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766470,
regarding RFS: ibus-libzhuyin/1.6.99.20140929-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:23:48 +
with message-id e1xin5a-0001bm...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #763615,
regarding RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:23:48 +
with message-id e1xin5a-0001bv...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: gtk-theme-switch/2.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #766682,
regarding RFS: gtk-theme-switch/2.1.0-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:23:48 +
with message-id e1xin5a-0001bh...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: openbox/3.5.2-8 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766842,
regarding RFS: openbox/3.5.2-8 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:04:57 +0100, Mateusz Ĺukasik wrote:
On 26.10.2014 15:27, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
* Patch work:
- Add from Fedora: dwb-gtk-deprecated.patch --fix FTBFS.
(Closes: #763220)
Okay. Please send a message to #763220 saying that there is a patch
available and
* Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de, 2014-10-27, 13:59:
spellintian[0] says:
NEWS: overriden - overridden
NEWS: allows to - allows one to
README.md: overriden - overridden
README.md: allows to - allows one to
I take it spellintian is not packaged?
Nope. Maybe you^Wwe could talk Lintian
Greetings Mr. Rice,
Thank you for contacting Lawyer.com.
I have validated your request and updated your free listing, please view
your updated profile here: http://www.lawyer.com/philip-robert-rice.html
If you are looking for increased online presence, and preferential access
to our Referral
Am Montag, den 27.10.2014, 10:52 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Schier:
Dear Tobi,
thanks for reviewing and sponsoring! Especially the
native-vs-non-native link was quite enlightening.
A few minutes ago I uploaded the new files
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Paul,
Thanks very much for the thorough review.
This looks like the only thing that would block the upload:
Some of the copyright holders are missing from debian/copyright.
I'm not sure what you're referring to here - `licensecheck --copyright` and
grep both
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 14:01 +1100, Carl Suster wrote:
I'm not sure what you're referring to here - `licensecheck
--copyright` and grep both seem to agree with the information in
d/copyright with only two differences: (1) I changed the aliases in
the copyright headers to the contributors' full
26 matches
Mail list logo
