Re: Seeking Sponsors for my package - roadfighter

I'm trying to correct my mistakes in packaging. In the first shipments for the mentors had made changes in the upstream source. Now sent without changes, but I am leave with no solutions in lintian. I would like to help in this case. Thank you. Em Seg, 2016-04-18 às 11:51 +0800, Paul Wise

Re: Seeking Sponsors for my package - roadfighter

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 00:16 -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > I waiting for more tips and comments, tips, advice or package approval. So far I have found 3 different upstream orig.tar.gz files all for version 1.0.1269. Neither of the upstream orig.tar.gz files you uploaded to mentors are

Re: Seeking Sponsors for my package - roadfighter

Hello everyone, Sorry for being slow to respond, I'm having some difficulties in part to solve this package. I accept any help or tips. https://mentors.debian.net/package/roadfighter Thank you, through previous email tips, helped me to make corrections of the package. I waiting for more tips

Bug#814921: RFS: sphde/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- sphde -- Shared Persistent Heap Data Environment library

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > BTW one single symbol file please I recommend using the C++ support in dpkg-gensymbols to achieve this, it is better than restricting particular symbols to particular arches etc. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Bas Wijnen writes: > I didn't look at the package, but just a quick note: Thanks. In the case of this package it is unusual; see its PyPI entry at . The game as I have packaged it is a normal command-line program: run the command

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Markus Koschany writes: > I had a look at your package and wanted to give you some feedback > because of the effort you put into packaging this game. Thank you! Are you a prospective sponsor of this package? > The vim comments at the bottom are not allowed (syntax-wise) Those

Re: Seeking Sponsors for my package - roadfighter

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > I'd upload as-is for now. Last time I looked at it, the data wasn't redistributable, let alone DFSG-free. It has been rejected from NEW once due to this. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2016/04/msg1.html -- bye, pabs

Re: Seeking Sponsors for my package - roadfighter

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > Awaiting reviews, tips, advice or approval of package. Did you see my earlier review? https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2016/04/msg1.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Markus Koschany writes: > I had a look at your package and wanted to give you some feedback > because of the effort you put into packaging this game. Thank you! Are you a prospective sponsor of this package? > The vim comments at the bottom are not allowed (syntax-wise) Those

Bug#821348: RFS: gap-grape/4.7+ds-2 [REPRODUCIBLE] - GRaph Algorithms using PErmutation groups for GAP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sponsors, I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package gap-grape which brings to Debian the GAP package GRAPE; GAP is a Computer Algebra System (CAS). This package attempts to render the Debian package

Bug#811393: Another try at flint-arb sponsoring

Hi, quite some time ago, Gianfranco wrote: > something needs changes: > > - std-version is now 3.9.7 Done. > - unsecure VCS fields Done. > - call ldconfig in rules? what? Uh... removed. > - changing names usually is just bad, people won't find the package, > and you will diverge from

Bug#821312: marked as done (RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.5.0-1 -- customize the new Iceweasel look)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2016 20:05:42 +0200 with message-id <20160417180542.ga25...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#821312: RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.5.0-1 -- customize the new Iceweasel look has caused the Debian Bug report #821312, regarding RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.5.0-1

Bug#821323: RFS: reniced/1.20-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "reniced" * Package name: reniced Version : 1.20-1 Upstream Author : Christian Garbs * URL : https://github.com/mmitch/reniced * License :

Bug#821316: RFS: python-backports-abc/0.4-1 [ITP #821301]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-backports-abc" * Package name: python-backports-abc Version : 0.4-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Bahnel et al. * URL :

Bug#821314: RFS: traitlets -- Lightweight Traits-like package

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for the package: * Package name: traitlets Version : 4.2.1 Upstream Author : IPython Development Team * URL : https://github.com/ipython/traitlets * License : BSD-3-clause

Bug#821312: RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.5.0-1 -- customize the new Iceweasel look

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a new release of classic-theme-restorer. * Package name: classic-theme-restorer Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Aris * URL :

Bug#814550: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462)

Thanks a lot for the review, I've fixed the license issues, libs and build deps. New uploaded version should appear on mentors in no time. The code with `make dist' and `mk-orig-source' is a fossil from first packaging attempt (trying to get both GBP and development in one repo). Now the package

Bug#821310: RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.6-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an update to aggressive-indent-mode. This new release fixes an important bug found in the version currently in Debian Stretch. * Package name: aggressive-indent-mode Version : 1.6-1

Bug#821309: RFS: flint/2.5.2-4 as *source* to *experimental*

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flint" * Package name: flint Version : 2.5.2-4 Upstream Author : Bill Hart * URL : http://flintlib.org * License : GPL-2+ Section :

Bug#821270: RFS: firefox-branding-iceweasel/0.3.0 [ITP] -- Preserves Iceweasel branding for new Firefox packages

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "firefox-branding-iceweasel" * Package name: firefox-branding-iceweasel Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : nord-stream * URL :

Bug#821236: RFS: netsed/1.2-2

Hi Mats, I've reviewed your package. It's in a good state, but there's a few things you might wanna take a look at: * debian/control: - Is "dpkg-dev" really a dependency? - Please run "wrap-and-sort -a" to sort the build dependencies. - The URL in "Vcs-Browser" can be the same as

Bug#821300: RFS: gap-float/0.6.3+ds-2 [DUMPtoGAP4r8] - multi-precision floating-point computation for GAP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package gap-float [1] which brings to Debian the GAP package `float'; GAP is a Computer Algebra System (CAS). This package mainly bumps the Debian package to the

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Am 17.04.2016 um 05:58 schrieb Ben Finney: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Howdy, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘python-adventure’. Hi Ben, I had a look at your package and wanted to give you some feedback because of the effort you put into packaging

Re: Seeking guidance re assisting with existing Debian package

Jeremy Davis writes: > Just wanting to clarify the process in my hope to assist with the > Debian package of Adminer. TBH I have never formerly been involved > with Debian packaging but I think that I have a reasonable idea of > what's involved. Thank you for your

Re: Seeking guidance re assisting with existing Debian package

Jeremy Davis writes: > -if I don't get a response, what then? After some weeks of no response, you can request an investigation by the Missing In Action team who will go through a formal process to determine whether the maintainer is MIA. > -if I get a response: > >

Seeking guidance re assisting with existing Debian package

Retrying to send as first time it bounced... Hi all, Just wanting to clarify the process in my hope to assist with the Debian package of Adminer. TBH I have never formerly been involved with Debian packaging but I think that I have a reasonable idea of what's involved. At least the basics...