Bug#822292: marked as done (RFS: nauty/2.6r5+ds-1 [NEWRELEASE] - library for graph automorphisms)

Your message dated Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:22:48 + with message-id <20160423022248.gg16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#822292: RFS: nauty/2.6r5+ds-1 [NEWRELEASE] - library for graph automorphisms has caused the Debian Bug report #822292, regarding RFS: nauty/2.6r5+ds-1

Bug#822292: RFS: nauty/2.6r5+ds-1 [NEWRELEASE] - library for graph automorphisms

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sponsors, I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package nauty [1]. This package mainly brings to Debian the lastest release of nauty. nauty stands for `No AUTomorphisms, Yes?'. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1]

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

Hi Gianfranco, Here is a link to the latest version, which uses triggers instead of postinst and postrm. I think it's ready to upload, but please double check :-) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.4.1-1.1.dsc Cheers, Nicholas

Bug#816169: RFS: fake-factory/0.5.3-1

any news on this? :) nearly a month passed, and the "problematic" thing has been merged upstream. On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:45:37PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:49:55AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: > > On 20/03/16 03:12, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > >> The issues

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

Hi Dimitri, On 22 April 2016 at 19:20, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I haven't looked closely, but i have a lot dubious emails about btrfs package. > (a) i do not maintain backports, anybody is free to do those > (b) all of my packages are lowNMU, meaning I trust any/all DDs to

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

On 23 April 2016 at 00:06, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > On 21 April 2016 at 08:33, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Hi Gianfranco, >> >> On 04/21/2016 09:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: activate update-initramfs >>> do you think it is worth adding to the

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

On 21 April 2016 at 03:53, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Policy §10.4 says that /bin/sh script need to follow SUSv3 + some > extensions. Both "hash" and "command -v" are optional in SUSv3 (but they are > mandatory in SUSv4), so in theory you shouldn't use them. In practice, > however,

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

On 21 April 2016 at 08:33, Christian Seiler wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, > > On 04/21/2016 09:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>> activate update-initramfs >> do you think it is worth adding to the current NMU or it is better to leave >> it for >> a future upload? > > I'm not

Bug#822150: marked as done (RFS: gap-guava/3.13+ds-1 [NEWREALEASE] - coding theory library for GAP)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:44:59 + with message-id <20160422204459.ga5...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#822150: RFS: gap-guava/3.13+ds-1 [NEWREALEASE] - coding theory library for GAP has caused the Debian Bug report #822150, regarding RFS: gap-guava/3.13+ds-1

Bug#821171: RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:42:03 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote: > > Okay, I'll fix it. > > Thank you. I am waiting for your uploading. 0.8.2 has been released, so I've updated to it. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/growl-for-linux/growl-for-linux_0.8.2-1.dsc pgpUTgmWLStgQ.pgp

Re: request more advice: lintian warnings and python-tldp + ldp-docbook-stylesheets

Thank you again for your replies, Gianfranco, >>I would like to get both my new package (python3-tldp) and a revised >>ldp-docbook-stylesheets on the conveyor belt into the Debian >>universe. > >ok > >>After trying to understand the flow of work and the current status >>with these two

Re: Workaround for "Architecture: any [!armel !armhf]" in debian/control

Hi, On 04/21/2016 10:32 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Joachim Reichel , 2016-04-19, 20:38: >> background: on armel and armhf Qt is using OpenGL ES, but my package cgal >> does >> not support OpenGL ES (yet). The OpenGL functionality is only needed for some >> demos and their

Re: request more advice: lintian warnings and python-tldp + ldp-docbook-stylesheets

Hi Martin >I would like to get both my new package (python3-tldp) and a revised >ldp-docbook-stylesheets on the conveyor belt into the Debian >universe. ok >After trying to understand the flow of work and the current status >with these two packages, I have come up with the following plan. >

Bug#821171: RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP]

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:26:23PM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote: > I've already contacted with upstream author in this issue, > isn't good enough? > https://github.com/mattn/growl-for-linux/issues/56 You are more than wonderful. And I am sorry to overlook this issue. > Okay, I'll fix it.

Bug#821171: RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:22:46 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote: > OK, prior confirmation is not always needed. > Generally, if others already have made package, > it is nice to contact him/her to avoid redundant work. > Now, since you have sent PR to upstream github to make packaging better, > I hope

Re: dbgsym package in d/control?

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:37:23PM +0200, Tim Dengel wrote: > I am currently preparing version 0.2.0-1 of my package gnome-twitch, and > I have a question about automatically generated dbgsym packages: Do I > need to list the -dbgsym package in debian/control? No. > According to the wiki at

Re: dbgsym package in d/control?

Hi Gert, Am 22.04.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Gert Wollny: > Did you add something like > > deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug unstable-debug main > > to your sources.list? Because I get a really long list of dbgsym > packages. My mistake, I forgot to do that on my laptop. After

Re: dbgsym package in d/control?

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:50:43PM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote: > 2016-04-22 13:37 GMT+02:00 Tim Dengel : > > I also get a warning when I'm building my package: "dpkg-genchanges: > > warning: package gnome-twitch-dbgsym listed in files list but not in > > control info" >

Re: dbgsym package in d/control?

Hello Tim,  Am Freitag, den 22.04.2016, 13:37 +0200 schrieb Tim Dengel: >  > According to the wiki at https://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage I > > need "no additional changes to your source package", There is indeed no need to change the source package.  > but I saw that the package openhpi

Re: dbgsym package in d/control?

Hi, 2016-04-22 13:37 GMT+02:00 Tim Dengel : > am currently preparing version 0.2.0-1 of my package gnome-twitch, and > I have a question about automatically generated dbgsym packages: Do I > need to list the -dbgsym package in debian/control? > you should not. >

dbgsym package in d/control?

Dear mentors, I am currently preparing version 0.2.0-1 of my package gnome-twitch, and I have a question about automatically generated dbgsym packages: Do I need to list the -dbgsym package in debian/control? According to the wiki at https://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage I need "no additional

Re: Seeking Sponsors for my package - roadfighter

Hi, On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:49:15AM -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > Now running lintian... > > 2. E: roadfighter: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share > usr/share/games/roadfighter/roadfighter > > 3. P: roadfighter: no-upstream-changelog > > 6. I: roadfighter: