Bug#820644: RFS: libretro-snes9x [ITP]

Ok, they are fixed. Copyright stuff fixed too; libretro folder should be the same license as the core, since libretro.c/cpp is based in the main loop file of the emulators (snes9x.cpp for example). cheers, sergio-br2 On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:28:00 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Well, you could add a custom target to debian/rules that calls > help2man for all these scripts - so that you as a maintainer > can refresh the manpages every now and then. (And store them > in debian/ in the packaging.) That way, you

Bug#821270: marked as done (RFS: firefox-branding-iceweasel/0.3.0 [ITP] -- Preserves Iceweasel branding for new Firefox packages)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:18:50 +0900 with message-id <20160604031850.ga7...@artemis.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#821270: Review of git version has caused the Debian Bug report #821270, regarding RFS: firefox-branding-iceweasel/0.3.0 [ITP] -- Preserves Iceweasel branding

Bug#826293: RFS: bit-babbler/0.5~bpo8+1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my trivial backport of "bit-babbler". I have already gotten Ron Lee's blessing to maintain the backport, and to add myself to Uploaders for the backport. We also discussed the Lintian I, P, and W

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

Hello, On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:30:05PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > Well, you could add a custom target to debian/rules that calls > help2man for all these scripts - so that you as a maintainer > can refresh the manpages every now and then. (And store them > in debian/ in the packaging.)

Bug#816652: RFS: compiz/1:0.9.12.2 [ITP:722451]

control: tags -1 moreinfo Setting moreinfo tags, until the first review is fixed. Gianfranco signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#814680: RFS: stp/2.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Simple theorem prover

control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:48:46 -0800 Afif Elghraoui wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, Marko, > > On الأحد 6 آذار 2016 14:53, Marko Dimjašević wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 17:42 -0800, Afif

Bug#816683: RFS: cloudabi-utils/0.8-1 [ITP]

control: tags -1 moreinfo Setting moreinfo until the blocking bug is resolved. G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#811426: RFS: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/1.0-1 [ITP]

control: tags -1 moreinfo On Sun, 15 May 2016 15:59:09 + Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:09:14PM -0800, Nathan Osman wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package > > "golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize" > > >

Bug#826182: marked as done (RFS: libretro-beetle-pce-fast [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 23:05:40 +0200 with message-id <5751f124.8050...@debian.org> and subject line RFS: libretro-beetle-pce-fast [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #826182, regarding RFS: libretro-beetle-pce-fast [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#826160: marked as done (RFS: node-getobject/0.1.0-2 -- set and get deep objects easily)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 23:01:36 +0200 with message-id <5751f030.60...@debian.org> and subject line RFS: node-getobject/0.1.0-2 -- set and get deep objects easily has caused the Debian Bug report #826160, regarding RFS: node-getobject/0.1.0-2 -- set and get deep objects easily to be

Bug#826268: marked as done (RFS: diskscan/0.19-1~bpo8+1)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:34:54 + (UTC) with message-id <775950226.7540059.1464986094624.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826268: RFS: diskscan/0.19-1~bpo8+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #826268, regarding RFS: diskscan/0.19-1~bpo8+1 to be marked as done.

Bug#826266: marked as done (RFS: dvtm/0.15-1~bpo8+1 ITP)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:29:37 + (UTC) with message-id <508358965.7640274.1464985777598.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826266: RFS: dvtm/0.15-1~bpo8+1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #826266, regarding RFS: dvtm/0.15-1~bpo8+1 ITP to be marked as done.

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

Hi >Spaces are not allowed in license names. But here the license name is >just “GPL-2+”. > >Let me quote the relevant part of the spec: >“An exception or clarification to a license is signalled in plain text, >by appending ‘with exception’ to the short name.” probably when I tried a) this

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-06-02, 17:07: "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" maybe something like License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception "FOO with BAR exception" is a valid licence syntax in DEP-5. If it is not appropriate to use it in this case, then you

Bug#826266: RFS: dvtm/0.15-1~bpo8+1 ITP

> >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dvtm/dvtm_0.15-1~bpo8+1.dsc > 404 Sorry. Should work now. -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language: eo,en,ru X-Keep-In-CC: yes X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io

Bug#826266: RFS: dvtm/0.15-1~bpo8+1 ITP

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dvtm/dvtm_0.15-1~bpo8+1.dsc 404 G.

Bug#826268: RFS: diskscan/0.19-1~bpo8+1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an updated bpo of "diskscan", and I filed a bpo request for it about two weeks ago. Please upload to delayed/15 to give Joao Eriberto Mota Filho pently of time to review/respond. Package name: diskscan

Bug#826266: RFS: dvtm/0.15-1~bpo8+1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvtm" * Package name: dvtm Version : 0.15-1~bpo8+1 Upstream Author : Marc Andre Tanner * Url : http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm *

Bug#821236: marked as done (RFS: netsed/1.2-2)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 18:03:36 + (UTC) with message-id <140325644.7333713.1464977016838.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#821236: RFS: netsed/1.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #821236, regarding RFS: netsed/1.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#826255: marked as done (RFS: obdgpslogger/0.16-1.3 [NMU])

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:46:17 + (UTC) with message-id <1385536383.7365355.1464975977113.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826255: RFS: obdgpslogger/0.16-1.3 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #826255, regarding RFS: obdgpslogger/0.16-1.3 [NMU] to be

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

On 03/06/16 17:59, Wookey wrote: On 2016-06-03 18:30 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: On 06/03/2016 06:25 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: And I don't mind for a handful of scripts. But what if you have 20 or 30? Well, you could add a custom target to debian/rules that calls help2man for all

Bug#826255: RFS: obdgpslogger/0.16-1.3 [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "obdgpslogger" * Package name: obdgpslogger Version : 0.16-1.3 Upstream Author : Gary Briggs * URL :

Re: Problems building phast against clapack

[ Hmpf, multiple X-Debbugs-Cc don't work the way I expected, hence attaching my initial email. Sorry for the noise on debian-med-packaging@, that's the only of the initial X-Debbugs-Cc that got through. ] This is now tracked in: https://bugs.debian.org/826253 Regards, Christian --- Begin 

Bug#819681: marked as done (RFS: python-django-gravatar2/1.4.0-2 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:14:55 + (UTC) with message-id <1362133245.7332857.1464974095164.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#819681: RFS: python-django-gravatar2/1.4.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #819681, regarding RFS:

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

On 2016-06-03 18:30 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 06/03/2016 06:25 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > And I don't mind for a handful of scripts. But what if you have 20 or > > 30? > > Well, you could add a custom target to debian/rules that calls > help2man for all these scripts - so that

Re: Problems building phast against clapack

I just noticed that I did not include mentors list in my answer... Il 03/giu/2016 13:53, "Giulio Paci" ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > Il 03/giu/2016 12:47, "Andrey Rahmatullin" ha scritto: > > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:20:09AM +0200, Andreas Tille

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

* Wookey , 2016-06-03, 17:10: Are there any successful examples of integration of help2man with a pybuild / debhelper workflow for an arbitrary number of scripts? help2man breaks cross-building so is best avoided if you can. Please just write a man page. Also, you can

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

On 06/03/2016 06:25 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 03/06/16 17:10, Wookey wrote: >> On 2016-06-03 16:43 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Are there any successful examples of integration of help2man with a >>> pybuild / debhelper workflow for an arbitrary number of scripts?

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

On 03/06/16 17:10, Wookey wrote: On 2016-06-03 16:43 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Dear all, Are there any successful examples of integration of help2man with a pybuild / debhelper workflow for an arbitrary number of scripts? help2man breaks cross-building so is best avoided if you can.

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

Hi, sending what I do on my machine >Il Venerdì 3 Giugno 2016 17:44, Ghislain Vaillant ha >scritto: >Dear all, > >Are there any successful examples of integration of help2man with a >pybuild / debhelper workflow for an arbitrary number of scripts? > >The only close example

Bug#826234: marked as done (RFS: xvt/2.1-20.2 [RC] [NMU] -- raise debhelper compatibility)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 16:13:13 + (UTC) with message-id <1331235339.7315143.1464970393044.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826234: RFS: xvt/2.1-20.2 [RC] [NMU] -- raise debhelper compatibility has caused the Debian Bug report #826234, regarding RFS:

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

On 2016-06-03 16:43 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Dear all, > > Are there any successful examples of integration of help2man with a > pybuild / debhelper workflow for an arbitrary number of scripts? help2man breaks cross-building so is best avoided if you can. Please just write a man page.

help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

Dear all, Are there any successful examples of integration of help2man with a pybuild / debhelper workflow for an arbitrary number of scripts? The only close example I could find was the stdeb package, but I am dealing with many more scripts and I cannot afford to list them all individually by

Re: Problems building phast against clapack

Hi Barak, not sure whether you follow the discussion on debian-mentors[1] On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:47:16PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:20:09AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > In other words you mean this is a bug in libf2c2 package > Yes, an RC one. > > > -

Bug#826234: RFS: xvt/2.1-20.2 [RC] [NMU] -- raise debhelper compatibility

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor of the package "xvt": Package name: xvt Version : 2.1-20.2 Upstream Author : John Bovey, University of Kent at Canterbury. URL : none License : permissive

Bug#826219: marked as done (RFS: localehelper/0.1.4-2 -- locale helper tool)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:27:15 + (UTC) with message-id <1683778971.7062623.1464956835137.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826219: RFS: localehelper/0.1.4-2 -- locale helper tool has caused the Debian Bug report #826219, regarding RFS: localehelper/0.1.4-2 --

Bug#826155: marked as done (RFS: node-get-stdin/5.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Easier stdin for Node.js)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:25:50 + (UTC) with message-id <1292386160.7021599.1464956750171.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826155: RFS: node-get-stdin/5.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Easier stdin for Node.js has caused the Debian Bug report #826155, regarding RFS:

Bug#826219: RFS: localehelper/0.1.4-2 -- locale helper tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "localehelper" * Package name: localehelper Version : 0.1.4-2 Upstream Author : Jakub Wilk * URL : http://jwilk.net/software/localehelper

Bug#826160: RFS: node-getobject/0.1.0-2 -- set and get deep objects easily

Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-getobject" sponsored. G. * Package name: node-getobject Version : 0.1.0-2 Upstream Author : "Cowboy" Ben Alman * URL : https://github.com/cowboy/node-getobject * License

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

Hi, I've updated the caffe package in the git repo, one of the major changes is that `python-caffe-cpu` was changed to `python3-caffe-cpu`. On 2 June 2016 at 07:00, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > > The build time testsuite, autopkgtest and piuparts serve different > purposes.

Re: Problems building phast against clapack

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:20:09AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > In other words you mean this is a bug in libf2c2 package Yes, an RC one. > - but how to fix this? I have no idea. MAIN__ is used by the library, but not defined in it. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#821270: Review of git version

Hi, after the latest fixes I put the package in deferred/5, to leave Sean enough time to review it and ack the latest changes. thanks for the nice contribution to Debian! G. Il Mercoledì 1 Giugno 2016 12:51, nord-stream ha scritto: Source:

Re: Problems building phast against clapack

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:03:28PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:59:00AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > ../munge-help.sh consEntropy.help_src > consEntropy.help > > gcc -O3 -Wall -I/build/phast-1.4/src/util/../../include > > -DPHAST_VERSION=\"v1.3\"

Bug#819681: RFS: python-django-gravatar2/1.4.0-1 [ITP]

Le mercredi 20 avril 2016 à 09:07:14+0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit : > Le mercredi 20 avril 2016 à 08:49:27+0200, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit : > > Tiago, when replying to a RFS, please use the bug report rather than the > > mailing list. > > > > * Tiago Ilieve

Re: Problems building phast against clapack

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:59:00AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > ../munge-help.sh consEntropy.help_src > consEntropy.help > gcc -O3 -Wall -I/build/phast-1.4/src/util/../../include > -DPHAST_VERSION=\"v1.3\" -DPHAST_HOME=\"/build/phast-1.4/src/util/../..\" >

Problems building phast against clapack

Hi, I recently have createt a package from clapack to build phast[1]. Unfortunately the build fails for reasons I do not understand. I expect that something might be wrong with either f2c or clapack packaging but I'm not sure. Anybody might be able to make some sense out of: ...

Bug#826076: Acknowledgement (RFS: lua-cwrap/0~20160222-gdbd0a62-1 -- CWrap package for Torch Framework [ITP])

Mentors package is updated.