Bug#832941: RFS: 4pane [ITP] (updated package)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "4pane" * Package name: 4pane Version : 4.0-1 Upstream Author : David Hart * URL : http://4Pane.co.uk * License : GPL3

Bug#827425: marked as done (RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:32:02 +0200 with message-id <60a5ad18-db3e-a628-764d-b217e5131...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind has caused the Debian Bug report #827425,

Bug#832934: RFS: pylucene/4.10.1+dfsg-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pylucene" * Package name: pylucene Version : 4.10.1+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://lucene.apache.org/pylucene/ * License

Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind

Hi there, On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 at 02:30:45 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme" > […] > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lacme/lacme_0.1-1.dsc > > More

Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

Hi, >still works for this pkg, i verified it. for consistency i will keep the >change on the next upload it works *again*, because somebody should have implemented some rewriterule in the server, that changes gitweb to cgit (as you can see, the link is changed into the cgit one). I have to

Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

Hi, >Gianfranco, i've uploaded version 1.3.0-1 to mentors, would you sponsor it? > >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciinema/asciinema_1.3.0-1.dsc uploaded with one change: Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/asciinema.git ^^ this is the updated Vcs

Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:22:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > >Gianfranco, i've uploaded version 1.3.0-1 to mentors, would you sponsor it? > > > >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciinema/asciinema_1.3.0-1.dsc > > > uploaded with one change: > Vcs-Browser:

Re: Extracting debhelper functionality

On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 15:33 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Hello! > > During my work to resolve (#832656), I encountered need to NMU > bcron-run package. It is old-style package, that does not use > debhelper. > > I inserted call to one particular debhelper (dh_runit) in Makefile > (total

Extracting debhelper functionality

Hello! During my work to resolve (#832656), I encountered need to NMU bcron-run package. It is old-style package, that does not use debhelper. I inserted call to one particular debhelper (dh_runit) in Makefile (total modernization in discouraged in NMU, and probably would take more efford). It

Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:26:10AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >PS: can I ping you when I have the new asciinema package? > > > I'm not a go developer, so somebody from your team might be better suitable > to look at the packages, but you can count on me as a backup

Bug#832750: marked as done (RFS: entrypoints/0.2.2-1 (ITP))

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:05:33 + (UTC) with message-id <2003961921.11274071.1469775933941.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#832750: RFS: entrypoints/0.2.2-1 (ITP) has caused the Debian Bug report #832750, regarding RFS: entrypoints/0.2.2-1 (ITP) to be

Bug#832814: marked as done (RFS: cligh/0.3-1 )

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:39:06 + (UTC) with message-id <284713961.11060913.1469774346510.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#832814: RFS: cligh/0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #832814, regarding RFS: cligh/0.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#832246: marked as done (RFS: cligh/0.2-5 )

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:39:06 + (UTC) with message-id <284713961.11060913.1469774346510.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#832814: RFS: cligh/0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #832246, regarding RFS: cligh/0.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#832808: RFS: cdist/4.2.2-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist" > >* Package name: cdist > Version : 4.2.2-1 EALREADYINUNSTABLE. G.