Bug#822149: marked as done (RFS: fed/0.951-17 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2016 04:29:17 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: fed/0.951-17 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #822149, regarding RFS: fed/0.951-17 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:35:37PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Gustavo > > > >> INSTALL_REQUIRES = ['restkit==4.2.2', 'watchdog==0.6.0'] > > >> why is restkit manually listed in runtime dependencies? > > > >that's for setuptools, I could patch it out, but why? > > > please read

Bug#835253: RFS: steghide/0.5.1-11 [QA]

Hello Gianfranco. On 09/08/2016 02:43 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, while waiting for Bruno's review, I'm adding another little (unasked) > one. Your reviews are welcome! > > debdiff steghide_0.5.1-10_amd64.deb steghide_0.5.1-11_amd64.deb > > you are installing too many manpages >

Bug#835253: RFS: steghide/0.5.1-11 [QA]

Hi, while waiting for Bruno's review, I'm adding another little (unasked) one. debdiff steghide_0.5.1-10_amd64.deb steghide_0.5.1-11_amd64.deb you are installing too many manpages -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/man/man3/BmpFile.3.gz -rw-r--r-- root/root

Bug#837040: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.2-0.1 [RC NMU]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:26:17PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Adam, > > >Actually, if you've read responses to this bug report: > > > I read them, but the title for the RFS was wrong, we were talking about > unstable. > > The RFS is targeting testing, that is impossible because

Bug#837040: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.1-1~bpo8+1 [RC NMU]

Hi Adam, >Actually, if you've read responses to this bug report: I read them, but the title for the RFS was wrong, we were talking about unstable. The RFS is targeting testing, that is impossible because that version is not even in unstable. look at the mentors package Version:

Bug#837040: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.1-1~bpo8+1 [RC NMU]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:03:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 pending > control: severity 836778 serious > Justification: I think data losses are considered serious RC bug in Debian Actually, if you've read responses to this bug report: > >> > I

Bug#835253: RFS: steghide/0.5.1-11 [QA]

It was actually missing doxygen so the manpages would be built. I have just uploaded it with the new change. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/steghide Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using

Bug#835253: RFS: steghide/0.5.1-11 [QA]

Gentlemen, please disregard the last update I sent. The installation of manpages do not really work when in a clean environment. I will try again and report back. Thanks. -- Fernando Seiti Furusato IBM Linux Technology Center signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#837040: marked as done (RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.2-0.1 [RC NMU])

Your message dated Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:03:53 + (UTC) with message-id <1594618377.6263381.1473332633...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#837040: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.1-1~bpo8+1 [RC NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #837040, regarding RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.2-0.1 [RC NMU] to be marked

Bug#837050: RFS: clsparse/0.10.1.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clsparse" * Package name: clsparse Version : 0.10.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clSPARSE *

Bug#836903: RFS: qevercloud/3.0.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial Evernote Cloud API library for Qt

Hello, I am the upstream developer of QEverCloud library. Sorry for the interference, I'd just like to clarify a bit what QEverCloudGenerator is and how it is intended to work. Let me start from a brief description of how Thrift IDL - interface definition language - works. It is a