Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2016 04:29:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #844184,
regarding RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:25:29PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > 5. There are a lot of Lintian warnings. Please make the package
> > Lintian-clean.
>
> I'm having trouble with "W: elpa-muse: syntax-error-in-debian-news-file
> line 68 "found eof where expected first heading", and have
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 20:39 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>
> Your changes seem to be correct. I plan to upload the attached diff
> in some hours if you don't mind.
I see it in the NEW queue, thank you!
Hi Sean,
Thank you very much for all your help and for this review! Would you
please pull my working copy from here:
git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git
here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git
or consult this:
Dear David,
Here's another review, based on your 4pane-debian-dir repo.
Must-fixes
--
1. At least one of the files added by AddExtraM4Files.patch isn't
accounted for in d/copyright.
2. Vcs-* still point to the upstream code, not your 4pane-debian-dir
repo.
3. d/copyright says that
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM, lumin wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:37 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> I don't think it was a bad upload, because I used DoM to build and
>> test it.
>
> Thank you for confirmation. I checked the package at DoM and
> it is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl"
* Package name: asl
Version : 0.1.7-1
Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific
* URL : http://asl.org.il
* License : AGPL-3
Control: tags 843775 + pending
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 12:43 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@)
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Jens Sauer (2016-11-22):
> > Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this,
> > I hope everything is
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2016-11-24 11:21+0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> > can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads?
> >
> > i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue
> > (after removing
> > .buildinfo from
On 2016-11-24 11:21+0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads?
>
> i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue (after
> removing
> .buildinfo from .changes)
Sure!
- First I was told to remove the .buildinfo from the
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:37 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> I don't think it was a bad upload, because I used DoM to build and
> test it.
Thank you for confirmation. I checked the package at DoM and
it is correct. So let's wait for maintainers' comments.
Hi,
>Where can I find the deferred package? I found nothing at
>https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred/
you can't.
Nobody can, just ftpmasters.
(and I did even upload to a queue that is not visible there)
>I'd like to confirm the package you sponsored shipped
>the correct patch, since the
Hi,
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 08:44 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> and sponsored in deferred/5.
Where can I find the deferred package? I found nothing at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred/
I'd like to confirm the package you sponsored shipped
the correct patch, since the original
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:07:31AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >I am looking for a sponsor for a new Debian upload of my package
>
> >"confget" to refresh some aspects of the Debian packaging.
>
>
> I also granted you dm for it :)
Thanks! :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:07:31 + (UTC)
with message-id <221972147.1764331.1479982051...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#844599: RFS: confget/2.0.0-2 -- updated packaging
has caused the Debian Bug report #844599,
regarding RFS: confget/2.0.0-2 -- updated packaging
to be
On 2016-11-23 20:50, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
* Update manpage. (Closes: #800669)
+ cp doc/openbox.1.in openbox.1
I don't get this:
how do you plan to update stuff like
@configdir@/openbox/autostart.sh
and similar?
I don't get it,
Hi,
>to be honest, i don't have a good reason besides testing the resulting deb and
>that is
>my existing workflow
I usually do two dpkg-buildpackage, one for my system, and the source one for
ftpmasters
the second one is usually really fast, because it just requires a source pack,
no
17 matches
Mail list logo