Bug#852655: RFS: wxmaxima/16.12.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wxmaxima" * Package name: wxmaxima Version : 16.12.2-1 Upstream Author : Andrej Vodopivec * URL : http://andrejv.github.io/wxmaxima/ * License : GPL

Bug#852636: marked as done (RFS: llmnrd/0.3-1)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:51:09 +0200 with message-id <20170125235109.hdslvbkmeusm2e5d@localhost> and subject line llmnrd/0.3-1 uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #852636, regarding RFS: llmnrd/0.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#852504: marked as done (RFS: udfclient/0.8.7-1)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Jan 2017 01:43:50 +0200 with message-id <20170125234348.u2okj2f4ua5xz4nw@localhost> and subject line udfclient/0.8.7-1 uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #852504, regarding RFS: udfclient/0.8.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#852636: RFS: llmnrd/0.3-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "llmnrd" * Package name: llmnrd Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Tobias Klauser * URL : https://github.com/tklauser/llmnrd * License

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library [...] needed by [...]

Thanks, Andrey, for the input. I've dug around a little more now and found that the reason for the error was the fact that the library that couldn't be found was indeed built, but was not part of a package. That's what dpkg-shlibdeps was complaining about. Thanks again, cheers, Nico On Mon,

Bug#852626: RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC]

Hello, >I am on it :) not sure, I probably uploaded it before you? G:

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

Hi Gergely, thanks for your message. On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:45:25 +0100 Gergely Risko wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Sorry, don't have the time to followup on the whole discussion again. > > As many times I told Shlomi Fish, I'm happy to help with this package, > but yes, I have a

Bug#852626: marked as done (RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC])

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:11:45 + (UTC) with message-id <1735180055.1698315.1485367905...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#852626: RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #852626, regarding RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#852626: RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC]

to late ;) De : PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel Envoyé : mercredi 25 janvier 2017 19:10 À : Ghislain Vaillant; 852...@bugs.debian.org; sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#852626: RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC] I am on it :) Cheers

Bug#852626: RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC]

I am on it :) Cheers De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 25 janvier 2017 19:00 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#852626: RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC] Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking

Bug#852474: marked as done (RFS: hdparm/9.51+ds-1 -- tune hard disk parameters for high performance)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:05:53 +0100 with message-id <20170125180553.g7amuynwwuwfd...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#852474: RFS: hdparm/9.51+ds-1 -- tune hard disk parameters for high performance has caused the Debian Bug report #852474, regarding RFS: hdparm/9.51+ds-1 --

Bug#852626: RFS: h5py/2.7.0~rc3-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "h5py" * Package name: h5py   Version : 2.7.0~rc3-1   Upstream Author : Andrew Colette * URL : http://www.h5py.org/ * License : BSD   Section : python

Transmaquina - Búsqueda de Proveedor Grúas Telescópicas y Maquinaria

estimados srs. por medio de la presente, queremos presentar nuestra organización, en transmaquina somos un equipo motivado por el servicio y la seguridad para nuestros clientes. sabemos que su empresa participa en el ramo de logística y de ahi nuestro interes de entrar en contacto el día de

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Dynamic library inside Python module python-pysam not found

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 05:28:34PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > tests of python-pbcore failed with > > > > > > ERROR: Failure: ImportError (libchtslib.so: cannot open shared object > > > file: No such file or directory) > > > > > > When installing python-pysam 0.10.0+ds-1 I get > > > > > >

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Dynamic library inside Python module python-pysam not found

Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:54:29PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > tests of python-pbcore failed with > > > > ERROR: Failure: ImportError (libchtslib.so: cannot open shared object > > file: No such file or directory) > > > > When installing python-pysam 0.10.0+ds-1 I get > > > > $ ls -l

Bug#852148: marked as done (RFS: zodb/1:3.10.7-2)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:29:28 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: zodb/1:3.10.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #852148, regarding RFS: zodb/1:3.10.7-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Dynamic library inside Python module python-pysam not found

On 01/25/2017 04:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to upgrade the python-pysam package. When I build the > current status in Git[1] the package builds fine. However I tried to > build python-pbcore that Build-Depends python-pysam and the build time > tests of python-pbcore

Re: Dynamic library inside Python module python-pysam not found

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:17:14PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I'm wondering why libchtslib is not found by all those dynamic libs. It is not found because it doesn't exist in the package. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Dynamic library inside Python module python-pysam not found

Hi, I'm trying to upgrade the python-pysam package. When I build the current status in Git[1] the package builds fine. However I tried to build python-pbcore that Build-Depends python-pysam and the build time tests of python-pbcore failed with ERROR: Failure: ImportError (libchtslib.so:

Bug#851884: marked as done (RFS: fdkaac/0.6.3-1)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2017 07:08:10 -0700 with message-id <20170125140810.laynt3yh5stlm...@iris.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#851884: RFS: fdkaac/0.6.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #851884, regarding RFS: fdkaac/0.6.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#852136: marked as done (RFS: fssync/1.6-1)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:27:49 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: fssync/1.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #852136, regarding RFS: fssync/1.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt