Bug#884752: RFS: fcitx-skk/0.1.4-0.2 [NMU]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Boyuan Yang, as said already by ARon, a NMU only for changing the maintainership is not appropiate. Are you member of the IME Packaging Team? In this case it would be a Team-Upload (do do not need to add your name to Uploaders on a Team upload.) Wait: This is in

Bug#884143: ITA: urbit/0.5-1 -- an operating function

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: retitle -1 RFS: urbit/0.5-1 -- an operating function Hi Ted, (The control line just straights up the bug title and set the "moreinfo tag, which basically says that you need to refine your package.) > https://bootstrap.urbit.org/urbit_0.5-1_amd64.upload You

Bug#884143: ITA: urbit/0.5-1 -- an operating function

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: retitle -1 RFS: urbit/0.5-1 -- an operating function Hi Ted, (The control line just straights up the bug title and set the "moreinfo tag, which basically says that you need to refine your package.) > https://bootstrap.urbit.org/urbit_0.5-1_amd64.upload You

Bug#884697: RFS: logrotate/3.13.0-1 ITA

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hallo Christian, As logrotate is not (yet) orphaned, did you try to get in touch with Paul? We've ping Paul in the scope of a MIA process and it has reached a certain severity already (prod, [2]), I will support that the package will get into active maintainership soon

Bug#872680: RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.1-1 [ITA]

Hi Carlos, thanks for adopting the package! I've just uploaded it, especially as this packages seem to have waited quite long time already and the quality is ok! There is already a new version upstream, would be great if you could update it to the latest version (ping me when ready for

Bug#872680: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.1-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Sat, 23 Dec 2017 13:05:47 +0100 with message-id <1514030747.2626.19.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.1-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #872680, regarding RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.1-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#884963: marked as done (RFS: zssh/1.5c.debian.1-4 [ITA])

Your message dated Sat, 23 Dec 2017 12:46:58 +0100 with message-id <1514029618.2626.14.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#884963: RFS: zssh/1.5c.debian.1-4 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #884963, regarding RFS: zssh/1.5c.debian.1-4 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#884780: RFS: piu-piu/1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi! Actualy it's just a bash script, one file. There are no 'source', it is the source. What shal i do? https://github.com/vaniacer/piu-piu-SH/blob/master/piu-piu 23.12.2017 6:33, Adam Borowski пишет: * Package name: piu-piu Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Ivan Marov

Bug#870714: marked as done (RFS: golden-ratio-el/1.0-2~bpo9+1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:23:36 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: golden-ratio-el/1.0-2~bpo9+1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #870714, regarding RFS: golden-ratio-el/1.0-2~bpo9+1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#870716: marked as done (RFS: golden-ratio-el/1.0-2~bpo9+1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:23:36 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: golden-ratio-el/1.0-2~bpo9+1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #870714, regarding RFS: golden-ratio-el/1.0-2~bpo9+1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means