Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "pyshacl"
Package name: pyshacl
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Ashley Sommer
URL : https://github.com/RDFLib/pyshacl
License : Apache License 2.0
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "owlrl"
Package name: owlrl
Version : 5.2.0
Upstream Author : Ivan Herman
URL : https://github.com/RDFLib/OWL-RL
License : W3C
Programming Lang:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ca-certificates"
* Package name: ca-certificates
Version : 20190110
* License : GPL-2+, MPL-2.0
Section : misc
It builds those binary packages:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor to upload to experimental the version of doxygen
that was released by upstream last month.
I would like to maintain it with gbp, and I have created a git repo for that:
Paul Wise writes:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:06 PM wrote:
>
>> Could somebody please explain me the meaning of the "Checking
>> build-dependency (indep) on amd64" migration excuse as seen on
>> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pacemaker?
>
> Looking at the code, I think it means that
Hi HuangKaiXiang,
Thank you for your interest in Debian!
I'd like to add some points that Paul Wise missed.
Apart from those packaging tutorial/guides, reading examples is a good
way to learn skills and improve yourself quickly. When you are about to
do that, you may possibly need this code
Hi,
Thanks for the pointers. But I think I'm not able to fix it even if
I tried to diagnose the debug information.
ATM I asked several people and it is likely that the dwz error
stems from toolchain support problem. Now the build log on non-release
archivectures are also available, and it seems
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:06 PM wrote:
> Could somebody please explain me the meaning of the "Checking
> build-dependency (indep) on amd64" migration excuse as seen on
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pacemaker?
Looking at the code, I think it means that the migration scripts are
On 2018-12-27.23:06, Scott Leggett wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcpcd5"
>
> Package name: dhcpcd5
> Version : 7.0.8-1
> Upstream Author : Roy Marples
> URL :
Hi,
Could somebody please explain me the meaning of the "Checking
build-dependency (indep) on amd64" migration excuse as seen on
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pacemaker?
I think I understand the rest, although I don't know whether the
autopkgtest regression blocks migration
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:38 PM HuangKaiXiang wrote:
> Hello everyone, I want to join as a Debian developer.
Hi, thanks for your interest in Debian :)
> The new maintainer manual tells me that I can get help here.
> I need a mentros to help and tell me how to do it.
There are lots of different
11 matches
Mail list logo
