Bug#1064837: Can closed

Hi, closed. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser git:  https://git.jff.email/cgit/ Skype:jff-skype@jff.email

Bug#1064837: marked as done (RFS: libhx/4.23-1 [RC] -- C library providing queue, tree, I/O and utility functions)

Your message dated Fri, 01 Mar 2024 08:38:02 +0100 with message-id <14e9798ceeb8d1be6f070b62e23f1afd8a5a9e2e.camel@jff.email> and subject line Can closed has caused the Debian Bug report #1064837, regarding RFS: libhx/4.23-1 [RC] -- C library providing queue, tree, I/O and utility functions to be

Re: Bug#1065078: Question about the debian group on Salsa

Generally you should create the repository under the debian namespace unless you really don’t want anyone else making any changes to it, even if the changes are urgent and you are AFK for some reason. I have created a repository named planner under debian and have granted you Developer access.

Bug#1065102: RFS: serioussam/1.10.6d+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "serioussam": * Package name : serioussam Version : 1.10.6d+dfsg-1 Upstream contact : https://github.com/tx00100xt/SeriousSamClassic/issues * URL :

Bug#1065078: Question about the debian group on Salsa

Dear mentors, I'm curious about the guidelines for putting a package under the debian namespace on Salsa . I wasn't able to find much discourse about this online. This package didn't have a salsa repository created for it, I am unsure whether I should create

Bug#1065078: RFS: planner/0.14.92-1 [ITA] -- project management application

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "planner": * Package name : planner Version : 0.14.92-1 Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL :

Re: Remove package from unstable?

Did we ever implement the "bump epoch should go to new queue"? I would like to see packages going in some new queue, this way ftpmasters can check if the epoch bump was a mistake or not. (and I can't just test by myself, I don't want to risk bumping epoch on my packages!) G. Il giovedì