Bug#799092: RFS: haxe/1:3.2.0+dfsg-1

Hi Vincent, hi Andy, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 16 septembre 2015 03:46 +0800, Andy Li : > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haxe". >> I'm a member of the Haxe Foundation. I would like to maintain the >>

Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:26:00AM +, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: Hello Hi, thanks for reviewing. Gabriele Giacone wrote: haxe (1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Adopt as Debian Flash Team. + Set maintainer to Debian Flash team, add myself to uploaders

Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:05:16PM +, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: Cool, but I think your are missing my point. Because you had to remove two files from the original tar ball, both d/rules get-orig-source and uscan now returns an incorrect source tarball, I mean it does contain the files

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:03:48PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:41:02PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: [1] https://github.com/libming/libming/issues/42 I've just updated the list few hours

Bug#785514: closed by Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org (closing RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC])

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:30:10PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:27:40 + From: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org To: 785514-d...@bugs.debian.org Subject: closing RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC] Package ming has been removed from mentors. Re-uploaded

Bug#785737: RFS: haxe/1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 [ITA,RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package haxe * Package name: haxe Version : 1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse ncannasse at motion-twin.com * URL : http://haxe.org *

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:41:02PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi Gabriele, Hi Vince, About the re-licensing of php_ext/ming.c and php_ext/php_ming.h, does the relevant Github issue [1] mean that the re-licensing wasn't actually ACK-ed by all the contributors of these files? This sounds

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:14:23PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: - java_ext/* doesn't seem to be licensed under LGPL-2.1+ as claimed by d/copyright, but under this license instead: This software is copyright 2001 E-Publishing Group Inc.

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: BTW getting rid of java extension would not be a problem Great, please do ASAP as you have made mentors.d.n violate the law. I guess unstable has been violating it since

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ming * Package name: ming Version : 1:0.4.7-1 Upstream Author : The Ming Development Team * URL : http://www.libming.org/ * License : LGPL-2.1

Bug#784831: RFS: gnash/0.8.11~git20150419-1~bpo8+1 [1st upload to bpo]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, as suggested by #772843, looking for a sponsor for the first upload to jessie-backports. jessie doesn't ship gnash. Uploaded to mentors with -v0.8.11~git20140319+dfsg-1~bpo70+1 (last wheezy-backports upload):

Bug#740032: sweethome3d-textures_1.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[CC'ing bug just to make anyone else interested know] On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hi Gabriele, Sorry but I haven't interest in sponsoring your package(s) more. Regards, Eriberto If/whenever I change my mind about splitting it, you'll be the

Bug#740032: sweethome3d-textures_1.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed Hello ftpmasters, I switched

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hi want help you (as sponsor). Where I can find the original upstream tarball? debian/watch file and debian/rules get-orig-source should help.

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hum... Not a good reply... I should find the download site in d/copyright header. Right, fixed on git http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/sweethome3d-textures.git Do you made a unique tarball from two independent

Bug#740032: sweethome3d-textures: new upstream release 1.0.1

Control: reopen -1 Uploaded new upstream version 1.0.1: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-textures dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-textures/sweethome3d-textures_1.0.1-1.dsc Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sweethome3d-textures * Package name: sweethome3d-textures Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret eTeks i...@eteks.com * URL :

Bug#740035: RFS: sunflow and sweethome3d [DM but 1st upload to backports]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist [ X-Debbugs-CC'ing tmancill who sponsored me many times lately and d-backports@l.d.o ] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages sunflow and sweethome3d. I have DM grant for both but first upload to backports needs to be sponsored

Bug#736952: RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command

Bug#736952: RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC]

due to #733373. Maintainer is unresponsive. Regards, Gabriele Giacone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cabcawc1gcwyygsmorcyo

Bug#736952: RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/ming/ming_0.4.5-1.1.dsc or clone https://github.com/gg0/libming-debian Changes since

Bug#736988: RFS: freehep-graphics2d/2.1.1-4

at: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/freehep/freehep-graphics2d.git Changes since the last upload: [ Giovanni Mascellani ] * Added real watch file * Fixed my email address. [ Gabriele Giacone ] * Added patch from sweethome3d upstream to fix SVG export (Closes: #657700

Re: Problem with unusual upstream source directory

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote: hi again, So I have got a problem, upstream has localization files in po/ directory. When make is called, it traverses to po/ and also calls make, then .po files change (they are updated with the

Re: Problem with unusual upstream source directory

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote: 2014/1/3 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com: Teach clean target how to remove them. No-no-no :-) *.po files are handwritten [1] $ debuild -ipo -- G..e -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ

Re: Problem with unusual upstream source directory

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote: 2014/1/3 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com: Teach clean target how to remove them. No-no-no :-) *.po files are handwritten [1] $ debuild

Bug#694387: RFS: pidgin-skype/20121121+svn646+dfsg-1 [DM but packages in NEW]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-skype * Package name: pidgin-skype Version : 20121121+svn646+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Eion Robb eionr...@gmail.com * URL :

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

/package/sweethome3d-furniture-editor Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture-editor/sweethome3d-furniture-editor_1.2-1.dsc Regards, Gabriele Giacone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

Sorry, correct dsc path is http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture-editor/sweethome3d-furniture-editor_1.8-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#689126: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture{,nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP]

Renamed to furniture (w/o s) and reuploaded. http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furniture http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture/sweethome3d-furniture_1.2-1.dsc dget -x

Bug#689126: RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP]

-nonfree/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree_1.2-1.dsc Regards, Gabriele Giacone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120929105426.GA26337@phenomenon

Bug#688411: sponsorship-requests: Please convert my DM upload permissions to new format

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Attached file should grant me upload permissions according to new interface [0] for packages I currently can upload [1]. Rename it replacing LOGIN and EPOCH. Thanks. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html [1]

Bug#688411: sponsorship-requests: Please convert my DM upload permissions to new format

On 09/22/2012 04:43 PM, Arno Töll wrote: On 22.09.2012 16:28, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Attached file should grant me upload permissions according to new interface [0] for packages I currently can upload [1]. ... Allow: critterding gnash jedit jinput jutils jxplorer lwjgl sunflow sweethome3d

Bug#674483: RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] (Was: Re: Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language)

Please upload haxe and neko for me before the freeze. I'm trying to adopt them just because haxe is needed by gnash testsuite and I'd like bringing it back in stable. Swftools has been reintroduced few months ago, haxe would be the only missing test tool. If I won't find any sponsor, I'll

Bug#674483: RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] (Was: Re: Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language)

retitle 674483 RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] thanks haxe -- Web-oriented universal programming language neko -- Lightweight virtual machine On 06/13/2012 09:56 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: You can found some lintian report. Could you check ? http://mentors.debian.net/package/haxe Reuploaded, it

Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language

Package: sponsorship-requests Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package haxe. haxe has been removed one year ago due to FTBFS on kfreebsd still reproducible http://deb.li/3KVzx. This version builds fine. * Package name: haxe Version : 1:2.9+20120414-1 Upstream

Bug#660774: RFS: gnash/0.8.10-3~bpo60+1 [DM uploads to bpo]

On 02/26/2012 02:34 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: it looks like gnash is no longer on mentors.d.n, probably it was removed because unstable has a higher version (might be a bug in debexpo). Could you make the package available somewhere else? Also consider to update the Git branch as well. I

Bug#660774: closed by Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (Re: Bug#660774: RFS: gnash/0.8.10-3~bpo60+1 [DM uploads to bpo])

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 02:54:46PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: The last change is from 2011-08-04. Maybe you forgot to push the changes? It was neither updated nor tagged as I said. Sorry. Pushed. -- Gabriele -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#660774: RFS: gnash [DM uploads to bpo]

Package: sponsorship-requests Hi, following [0], first upload has to be sponsored. Could anyone please upload gnash to backports for me? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash/gnash_0.8.10-3~bpo60+1.dsc [it should go in testing tomorrow] Thanks. -- Gabriele [0]

Re: upload to debian.mentors disappears without a trace.

On 02/20/2012 03:11 AM, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Paul Elliott wrote: I have successfully uploaded to debian mentors, it has been more than 30 min. package has not appeared on list, no email message about it of any kind. From the logs it seems to have been rejected

Re: upload to debian.mentors disappears without a trace.

On 02/20/2012 03:39 AM, Paul Wise wrote: Looks like you are right there. This was a -1 upload sp dpkg-buildpackage should have automatically included the orig.tar.gz unless Paul explicitly did not include it (using -sd). Or a duplicate -1 changelog entry? from dpkg-genchanges man: By default,

RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

[ cc'ing d-mentors for RFS and mentors.d.o problems ] Hi, following [0], first upload has to be sponsored. Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9~bpo60+1.dsc [sweethome3d link is

Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

Package: sponsorship-requests Packages available at ftp://backports-master.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue Original Message Subject: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo] Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:52:39 +0100 From: Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com To: Debian Backports

Re: Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

On 02/09/2012 04:04 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: tag 659243 + moreinfo thanks On 02/09/2012 03:15 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me? What about [1]? Feb 09 12:15:37 gg0 Ganneff: I'm a DM, we have 2 packages with DMUA set

Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

Both links: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9~bpo60+1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d/sweethome3d_3.4+dfsg-1~bpo60+1.dsc On 02/09/2012 04:17 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: On 02/09/2012 04:04 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote

Re: Flash in debian

On 01/28/2012 02:09 PM, Christian Welzel wrote: A free runtime would be gnash. If swf is AS3 (AVM2), runtime can't be gnash cause it plays AS2 (AVM1) only. Your player would be lightspark if able. http://wiki.gnashdev.org/FAQ#What_should_gnash_play By the way, besides flex-sdk, you might try

Re: RFS: gnash (squeeze backports)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/08/2011 12:28 PM, Aron Xu wrote: Uploaded, in NEW of backports-master now. Thanks. [CC'ing mailing lists to make them know that] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/08/2011 12:18 PM, Sven Hoexter wrote: I try to look at it tonight but I can't assure that I'll have the time. Are there important fixes included that should hit the worl^unstable asap? I'd say there aren't any. No problem, take your time.

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kilian, On 08/08/2011 10:07 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: 1.) I see you now want the upload in unstable. I hope this was intended as 0.11.2-1 was only uploaded to experimental. 0.11.1-1 was only uploaded to experimental due to freeze. I'd want

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago)

: [...] obexpushd (0.11.1-1) experimental; urgency=low [...] -- Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:57:03 +020 That's bogus in so far that the upload to experimental didn't happen today but back in December 2010. For completeness, my fault: === commit

RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago) (was: Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago))

.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. DMUA flag would be really appreciated too. Kind regards Gabriele Giacone -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4/OQ8ACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvMOwCghB77/AV+rpjw0YhjmBewRMLt D/oAn0e1QmhCny5fHCW/BqzAMEA88Z6j

RFS: gnash (squeeze backports)

://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnash/gnash_0.8.10~git20110618-3~bpo60+1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Gabriele Giacone -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4/PoIACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsn+gCcDLoGfTq8UzISDhxut1gPvV0z

Re: RFS: useragentswitcher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/12/2011 04:29 AM, Williams Orellana wrote: Maintainer: Williams Orellana worell...@williamsorellana.org Uploaders: Debian Mozilla Extension Maintainers pkg-mozext-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org You should swap Maintainer and

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/31/2010 07:43 PM, Sven Hoexter wrote: Uploaded to experimental (cause of the freeze). There are no reverse B-D/Depends so I guess unstable would have been good too or better, no need to reupload it when squeeze is out. And yes, I removed the

RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago)

- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/obexpushd/obexpushd_0.11.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Gabriele Giacone -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/31/2010 05:54 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 02:51 +0200 schrieb Gabriele Giacone: 1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or Done Can you rename the git repository too? Renamed. 3

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/2010 03:34 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/26/2010 07:41 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: We try and maintain a symbiotic relationship with Debian. If we fix

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/2010 06:53 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: Given that you're interested in ubuntu packages, you could have learnt what happens if source package name already exists

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/31/2010 01:00 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote: I did a quick review: 1) Please rename the source package to ubiquity-extension (or Done 2) You use features of mozilla-devscripts 0.22 [2]. Please adjust the Build-Depends. Done 3)

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/26/2010 07:41 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: We try and maintain a symbiotic relationship with Debian. If we fix something, we send it upstream to help Debian. When Debian fixes something, we benefit. IMHO just the latter is always true.

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

On 10/26/2010 08:52 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote: Just for the records, Ubuntu has a ubiquity source package already (it's the d-i frontend), so if you're interested in having such package in Ubuntu too, you should consider using a different source name. I'm not interested in ubuntu. Rename could

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

On 10/26/2010 04:53 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: An existing source name conflict example I found: libsage2 - Source: sage xul-ext-sage - Source: sage-extension -extension sounds a little cleaner to me. ;) I'd like to keep ubiquity, name chosen by upstream. And it's good because there are

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

On 10/26/2010 06:17 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: Just to avoid some people complaining, I asked Ubuntu Archive Administrators to include ubiquity into their sync-blacklist list, so Ubuntu package won't be overwritten by accident. This has been just accomplished, so it's much safer using ubiquity

Re: RF[CS]: ubiquity (mozilla extension) in Debian

On 10/24/2010 06:37 PM, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: in general the auto-updating nature of feeds looks very convenient for users, so I'd say it would be nice to have both. i.e. extensions in the package and a configuration option (in the package? possibly disabled by default) to update the

RFS: webmeetme - managing conferences on an Asterisk PBX

these bugs: 586719 (ITP) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webmeetme/webmeetme_4.0.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Gabriele Giacone -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwifVYACgkQp3cdCbVcnCu19QCcDm6S2J

Re: Upload to fix bug #580413

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2010 01:29 PM, D Haley wrote: [...] At any rate, the package is marked as DMUA, so if someone could check my change, which is present in the package's git repo and then perform an upload, or at least advise me on what to do, that would be

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: Okay, I'm probably doing something wrong here, but it fails to build: dh_testroot You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! make: *** [maven-sanity-check] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error:

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2010 02:39 PM, Michal Čihař wrote: Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean. It seems you're not satisfying build dependencies (d-bp with -d option?).

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/02/2010 12:26 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: Hi Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com napsal(a): On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal ihaY wrote: The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/02/2010 11:05 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: For example because GPL-3 is not compatible with GPL-2 by itself. So once the code is under GPL-3 you can not use it in GPL-2 licensed program. Also I don't see reason why you should limit Debian users

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michal, On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked say so). Please fix it in debian/copyright. you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General

RFS: sweethome3d

/sweethome3d_2.2+dfsg-1.dsc I would be glad if someone reviewed and possibly uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Gabriele Giacone (I wanted to sign this email but I've just upgraded to icedove 3.0.1 from experimental and it seems enigmail for amd64 is not available) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

RFS: sunflow

to become its new maintainer [2] without O,RFA,ITA. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-1.dsc I would be glad if someone reviewed and possibly uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Gabriele Giacone [1] http://bugs.debian.org/475922 [2] http

RFS: critterding

and possibly uploaded this package for me. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/critterding/critterding_1.0-beta11+dfsg-1.dsc Kind regards Gabriele Giacone [1] http://bugs.debian.org/476284 [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2008/05/threads.html#00213 [3] http://wiki.debian.org

Re: Request for testing by someone in -mentors (Was: Re: RFS: instantbird)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, a ping after 2 weeks. could anyone satisfy Mike's request below? Many thanks and happy 2010! Gabriele Mike Hommey wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:07:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:19:13AM +0100, Gabriele Giacone

RFS: numptyphysics

it, you will want to sponsor it ;) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numptyphysics/numptyphysics_0.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Gabriele Giacone -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo costela Antunes wrote: Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN. No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7 weeks ago, 0.3.0.3 became

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise wrote: Might be a good idea to poke upstream about actually releasing 0.3 properly. Upstream poked. BTW, there are two ITPs, you should resolve that: http://bugs.debian.org/549357 http://bugs.debian.org/496586 They have been

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: Aside from these remarks, the package seems OK, the manpage is a nice touch, and I can't seem to replicate the segfaults I was having when I attempted my ITP. I'd still suggest co-maintaining it though, just cause I

Re: licenses

Charles Plessy wrote: You can find a longer discussion about MD5 implementations in the following thread on debian-mentors: http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2009080604.ga32...@kunpuu.plessy.org Thanks Charles. I didn't look for similar cases otherwise I would have found yours also

licenses

Hello mentors, The software I'm packaging includes 2 directories which contain files like these [1][2] and considers them as externals. [1] shows a license. Is it good for Debian? Should I only declare in d/copyright that software is derived from the RSA Data Security, Inc. MD5 Message-Digest

Re: licenses

Hi Rogerio, Rogério Brito wrote: I think that there are other packages in the archive that include this file. That being said, why not use one of the libraries that already provide md5 implementations? [...] The samething here. I, for instance, use libssl-dev for a package of mine

RFS: instantbird

regards Gabriele Giacone [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2009/11/threads.html#00033 Original Message Subject: Re: instantbird: modified libpurple Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:03:47 +0100 From: Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org To: Gabriele Giacone losga

no explicit license on upstream

Hello, I'm packaging iSpy [1]. ITP [2] gives a brief description. Upstream tarball is here [3]. Unpacking it, ispy application is under ispy directory. Under the remaining directories, you can find a bunch of dependencies which are already in Debian. Good. My question is about licenses:

RFS: java3d-fileloader

Dear mentors, Dear Java people, I'm packaging sweethome3d [1], a java application which depends on many libraries, all open source and released under DSFG-compatible licenses: (a) libitext-java (b) libvecmath-java (c) libjava3d-java (d) freehep-vectorgraphics-svg (e) sunflow (f) Java3D 3DS

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/p/pidgin-skype/pidgin-skype_0.1-1.dsc Gabriele Giacone wrote: Hello mentors, thanks to all for your suggestions. In the version I just duploaded: - tarball contains svn version - debian/copyright is in DEP-5 format - source package format is 3.0 (quilt

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

Hello mentors, thanks to all for your suggestions. In the version I just duploaded: - tarball contains svn version - debian/copyright is in DEP-5 format - source package format is 3.0 (quilt) (the only lintian error) - PNGs didn't change. I'm trying to contact the icons creator asking him to

RFS: pidgin-skype

ree - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pidgin-skype/pidgin-skype_0.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Gabriele Giacone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo