the patches done fore Debian, because not all
of Joe's changes were included.
This said, despite its maintainer seems to be active with other Debian
activities, it looks like libkarma needs more care. Maybe Joe Nahmias can
give
us his thoughts about having co-maintainers or transferring libkarma
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:25:47AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20051019-3
of the package joystick, which I'd like to adopt (it's been orphaned since
February, and last had a maintainer upload in October 2005).
[snip]
Hello Hubert,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:32:50AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:25:45PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
I am compiling under. What is the suggested/easiest/best/proper/Debian
way to do this?
dpkg --print-architecture.
Actually, I think the more proper
Hello Hubert,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:32:50AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:25:45PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
I am compiling under. What is the suggested/easiest/best/proper/Debian
way to do this?
dpkg --print-architecture.
Actually, I think the more proper
Luk,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am looking for a sponsor for the 'dmalloc' package. Here is the
relevant information.
Source package is available on mentors.debian.net, my current sponsor
hasn't
Luk,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am looking for a sponsor for the 'dmalloc' package. Here is the
relevant information.
Source package is available on mentors.debian.net, my current sponsor
hasn't
Hello Chris,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 03:08:27PM +0100, Chris Jefferson wrote:
I'm currently trying to package MAME, but thought that I would also look
for a sponsor, as I wasn't sure if it might be difficult for a
contraversal package.
Emulation in general is not *that* controversial -- I
Hello Chris,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 03:08:27PM +0100, Chris Jefferson wrote:
I'm currently trying to package MAME, but thought that I would also look
for a sponsor, as I wasn't sure if it might be difficult for a
contraversal package.
Emulation in general is not *that* controversial -- I
Hello Chirag,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:23:14PM +0530, Chirag Kantharia wrote:
Hi!
I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
a sponsor for this package.
I took a look at your package, a few issues:
0) For some reason you decided to build this as a
Hello Chirag,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:23:14PM +0530, Chirag Kantharia wrote:
Hi!
I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
a sponsor for this package.
I took a look at your package, a few issues:
0) For some reason you decided to build this as a
J I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
after my first attempt I realized
that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
This is a good thing -- Think security updates ;-)
Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
(Like
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
* Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-10 19:08]:
| (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
| (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
^
how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but without
any success.
Take a look
J I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
after my first attempt I realized
that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
This is a good thing -- Think security updates ;-)
Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
(Like
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
* Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-10 19:08]:
| (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
| (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
^
how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but without
any success.
Take a look
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
operating procedure for RFPs.
$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 157749 ITP: ...
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
submitter 157749 !
NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
owner !
This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
(ie. the pkg is uploaded).
Oops. I stand corrected. I
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
operating procedure for RFPs.
$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 157749 ITP: ...
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
submitter 157749 !
NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
owner !
This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
(ie. the pkg is uploaded).
Oops. I stand corrected. I
Nico Golde wrote:
I am surprised because i saw programs with an automatic created debian
manpage or without a manpage.
If you find a program in Debian without a manpage, please file a bug
(severity normal) against the package that provides it.
--Joe
Nico Golde wrote:
I am surprised because i saw programs with an automatic created debian
manpage or without a manpage.
If you find a program in Debian without a manpage, please file a bug
(severity normal) against the package that provides it.
--Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hello Florian,
Florian Effenberger wrote:
I've been working with Debian for three years now and consider myself to be
very experienced regarding the system. I maintain several servers and
routers and even support datacenters using Debian systems. I've written down
about 100 pages of
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
From your intro it looks like you could assist with the documentation
projects. Perhaps with the new installer docs? We always need more and
better documentation.
Agreed. I would recommend that Florian subscribe to the debian-boot
mailing list and see what you
Hello Florian,
Florian Effenberger wrote:
I've been working with Debian for three years now and consider myself to be
very experienced regarding the system. I maintain several servers and
routers and even support datacenters using Debian systems. I've written down
about 100 pages of
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
From your intro it looks like you could assist with the documentation
projects. Perhaps with the new installer docs? We always need more and
better documentation.
Agreed. I would recommend that Florian subscribe to the debian-boot
mailing list and see what you
Al Stone wrote:
The packages themselves are tools that run in
user-space, collecting and analyzing performance
data from a kernel module that must be loaded.
Why not create a shell script wrapper around the tool(s) that checks
that the module is loaded, or tries to load it if missing? If this
Amit Shah wrote:
lintian complains about
W: libogg-vorbis-header-perl: package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5
usr/lib/perl5/Ogg/Vorbis/Header.pm
but as Branden O'Dea mentioned[1], lintian is wrong in this case.
In that case you should use a lintian override; see section 2.4 of
Amit Shah wrote:
lintian complains about
W: libogg-vorbis-header-perl:
package-installs-nonbinary-perl-in-usr-lib-perl5
usr/lib/perl5/Ogg/Vorbis/Header.pm
but as Branden O'Dea mentioned[1], lintian is wrong in this case.
In that case you should use a lintian override; see section 2.4
-mentors_FAQ.html.
Let me know when you've solved the above and I'll take another look.
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/lM5lKl23+OYWEqURAhHqAKCGp3a0AguVWysc1xRYfO99nbxz/wCgsWhu
iG1DteT4X6xY1nIOAZ7V5Ng=
=qa5L
-END PGP SIGNATURE
-mentors_FAQ.html.
Let me know when you've solved the above and I'll take another look.
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/lM5lKl23+OYWEqURAhHqAKCGp3a0AguVWysc1xRYfO99nbxz/wCgsWhu
iG1DteT4X6xY1nIOAZ7V5Ng=
=qa5L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Clment Stenac wrote:
Hello,
This is my third try to find someone interested in the arp-sk program.
(http://www.arp-sk.org)
arp-sk is a tool that lets you create custom ARP packets, with fully
arbitrary fields, and at arbitrary rate.
I was interested when you first posted, but I don't
Clément Stenac wrote:
Hello,
This is my third try to find someone interested in the arp-sk program.
(http://www.arp-sk.org)
arp-sk is a tool that lets you create custom ARP packets, with fully
arbitrary fields, and at arbitrary rate.
I was interested when you first posted, but I don't
Cory Dodt wrote:
Note to AAP list: can I borrow anyone's web space for temporarily hosting
this package? This will help me get it into Debian that much faster!
Have you seen http://mentors.debian.net/ ? It was created for exactly
this purpose!
Joe Nahmias
Cory Dodt wrote:
Note to AAP list: can I borrow anyone's web space for temporarily hosting
this package? This will help me get it into Debian that much faster!
Have you seen http://mentors.debian.net/ ? It was created for exactly
this purpose!
Joe Nahmias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
, pppconfig is more powerful.
If all this is ok with you, I will happily sponsor you.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/f6/aKl23+OYWEqURAs0xAKDLjrbK2o94PSjsitVii1BzQjkoUACgo/KR
0WDePlsvjAg0FF4pVHtOfHU=
=twa9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
, pppconfig is more powerful.
If all this is ok with you, I will happily sponsor you.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/f6/aKl23+OYWEqURAs0xAKDLjrbK2o94PSjsitVii1BzQjkoUACgo/KR
0WDePlsvjAg0FF4pVHtOfHU=
=twa9
-END PGP SIGNATURE
to be sure I don't screw things up by
doing nothing.
File the bug, that'll make sure the problem doesn't get lost/forgotten.
Otherwise, it sounds like you're on the right track.
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Xjx/Kl23+OYWEqURAtDrAKCCAIp
to be sure I don't screw things up by
doing nothing.
File the bug, that'll make sure the problem doesn't get lost/forgotten.
Otherwise, it sounds like you're on the right track.
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Xjx/Kl23+OYWEqURAtDrAKCCAIp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip
Now I get it. It is the -vversion that I learned.
For moon-lander it would be
fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -v1:0.9.0-6 -uc -us
Now that we've figured out the usage of the -v option, will someone
please use it and
for public review,
mentors.debian.net provides a service that is useful for this purpose.
5) In the Where else can I get a sponsor section (perhaps having some
sort of numbering would help ;-), I would suggest adding the IRC
channels #debian-mentors and #debian-devel.
Thanks again!
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip
Now I get it. It is the -vversion that I learned.
For moon-lander it would be
fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -v1:0.9.0-6 -uc -us
Now that we've figured out the usage of the -v option, will someone
please use it and
for public review,
mentors.debian.net provides a service that is useful for this purpose.
5) In the Where else can I get a sponsor section (perhaps having some
sort of numbering would help ;-), I would suggest adding the IRC
channels #debian-mentors and #debian-devel.
Thanks again!
Joe Nahmias
are text -- No need to uu{en,de}code. Thanks Roger Ward!
- debian/control: Build-deps -= sharutils.
- debian/rules: remove references to uudecode.
* debian/control(Std-Ver): 3.6.1.0
-- Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:38:29 -0400
moon-lander (1:1.0-1) unstable
Eric Winger wrote:
So, two questions:
* Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
Yes.
* If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
building/maintaining your own archive.
You need to create a
Eric Winger wrote:
So, two questions:
* Is this a reasonable way to maintain our internal packages - ie a
seperate archive? Or is there a better way.
Yes.
* If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
building/maintaining your own archive.
You need to create a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Winger wrote:
Anyway, if anyone thinks it might be of value, or wants to read and
improve on it, let me know. I'd be happy to attach it.
I'd be interested to read this.
Thanks,
Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Winger wrote:
Anyway, if anyone thinks it might be of value, or wants to read and
improve on it, let me know. I'd be happy to attach it.
I'd be interested to read this.
Thanks,
Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2
the upgrade message if I upgrade from 0.6 to 0.7.
does someone have an idea?
You need to call db_go after all the db_input's to tell debconf to ask
the questions.
Hope this helps!
bye
mejo
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
in the repository
- -or-
b) already has the uploader as maintainer
- -or-
c) has a RFA/O bug filed in WNPP
That should provide a first line of defense against trojan packages.
Just my $0.02. Thanks again for the great service!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1
on alioth, no?
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+nU4zKl23+OYWEqURAl9GAKCKIjDxOA++6J1MEX/d/TSF3wIsQQCgzN9x
3zT2d8yWNfvZzzbYOu5Zrp4=
=yHIk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
of := or = ).
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
a Microsoft Outlook PST
(Personal Folders) file and convert it into mbox, kmail, it's own
recursive format, or separate each email into it's own file.
.
It can currently handle EMails, Folders and most Contacts.
Thanks in advance!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
Fielder George Dowding wrote:
I will sign up for the d-mentors list. I will lurk until I
understand what my next step is.
Also, you should peruse the list archives[0]. At lot of the same issues
seems to come up with frightening regularity!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
[0] http://lists.debian.org
developers have access to the archive.
Moderated : no
Subscription: developers only
So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^ ^^
Hope this answers your question!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.03.27.2151 +0100]:
So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
looking at the mails in the archive, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to
suffice.
If you say so. I'm not a DD yet, so all I can rely on is the
documentation
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^ ^^
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for that. Those with accounts can see
/etc/aliases on master.
Well, now I know
) unstable; urgency=low
* XPM files are text -- No need to uu{en,de}code. Thanks Roger Ward!
- debian/control: Build-deps -= sharutils.
- debian/rules: remove references to uudecode.
-- Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:21:10 -0500
moon-lander (1:1.0-1) unstable; urgency
developers have access to the archive.
Moderated : no
Subscription: developers only
So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^ ^^
Hope this answers your question!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.03.27.2151 +0100]:
So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
looking at the mails in the archive, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to
suffice.
If you say so. I'm not a DD yet, so all I can rely on is the
documentation
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^ ^^
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for that. Those with accounts can see
/etc/aliases on master.
Well, now I know
) unstable; urgency=low
* XPM files are text -- No need to uu{en,de}code. Thanks Roger Ward!
- debian/control: Build-deps -= sharutils.
- debian/rules: remove references to uudecode.
-- Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:21:10 -0500
moon-lander (1:1.0-1) unstable; urgency
Hello mentors,
quick question: Where is the proper place to report spam in the BTS (bug
#137152, to be specific)? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? file a bug?
Thanks!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello mentors,
quick question: Where is the proper place to report spam in the BTS (bug
#137152, to be specific)? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? file a bug?
Thanks!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
,
No, thank YOU in advance for your future contributions!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+b//rKl23+OYWEqURAu/QAJ9syCLUhiP2tnwYqTa6znn78No0TACfefrD
pM5aZCSOI++tyZAdy3kHubs=
=HIES
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
,
No, thank YOU in advance for your future contributions!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+b//rKl23+OYWEqURAu/QAJ9syCLUhiP2tnwYqTa6znn78No0TACfefrD
pM5aZCSOI++tyZAdy3kHubs=
=HIES
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Colin,
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:04:35PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
I just had a brainstorm about the sponsorship process that I wanted to
share for comment.
What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
Colin,
Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this
proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
3) Time-to-market: I believe the BTS-admins can implement this (better)
solution in a more expedient
of upstream's borked makefile for Debian.
-- Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:18:18 -0500
Build-Depends are: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libsdl1.2-dev (= 1.2.2-3.1),
libsdl-mixer1.2-dev, libsdl-image1.2-dev, sharutils.
Package (source and i386 binary for sarge) is available via apt using:
deb
Colin,
Does this mean that I have convinced you as to the merits of this
proposal (ie. using WNPP for sponsorship requests)?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
3) Time-to-market: I believe the BTS-admins can implement this (better)
solution in a more expedient
of upstream's borked makefile for Debian.
-- Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:18:18 -0500
Build-Depends are: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libsdl1.2-dev (= 1.2.2-3.1),
libsdl-mixer1.2-dev, libsdl-image1.2-dev, sharutils.
Package (source and i386 binary for sarge) is available via apt using:
deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Joe Nahmias wrote:
What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
For Sponsorship?
Comments?
AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP
done the work -- a win/win for all.
Comments?
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
PS - Please forgive me if this has been raised/discussed/beaten to
death...I didn't find anything in the archives...
PPS - Let's keep the discussion on -mentors, that's where it belongs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
) and am cc-ing the BTS.
Thanks in advance for your sponsorship!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
PS - There are plenty of NSFs available to download on the net...they're
not that hard to find if you search a bit...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+ZrtSKl23
) and am cc-ing the BTS.
Thanks in advance for your sponsorship!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
PS - There are plenty of NSFs available to download on the net...they're
not that hard to find if you search a bit...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+ZrtSKl23
the
manpages to be installed for a particular package. This is helpful if a
package has more than one manpage. See dh_installman(1) for more info.
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+VDFlKl23
the
manpages to be installed for a particular package. This is helpful if a
package has more than one manpage. See dh_installman(1) for more info.
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+VDFlKl23
this helps!
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+PsgNKl23+OYWEqURAhPQAKC976ZpQ7glZbduj8/tq7ehEdIW4wCfXeq/
HrM+pH1lpCFM/tP6EE+Nk+4=
=i51b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
, http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/, especially the
information at the end.
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+N1t/Kl23+OYWEqURAnWLAKCGZOE5vVpCCr7La/ZAXTPLcvXgVACfetjf
ZBi2yoCN8hChaqtn/Vd39Ok=
=20Re
to try for yourself, add the following to sources.list:
deb-src http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian /
Thanks for your help!
Joe Nahmias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would like to try for yourself, add the following to sources.list:
deb-src http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian /
Thanks for your help!
Joe Nahmias
. acidwarp)
What are the pros/cons of each of these methods? Is there another
generally accepted solution to this problem that I haven't found?
Thanks for your input!
Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Here is the relevant snippet from one of the buildd logs that
failed:
** Using build
Sam,
Does this mean apt-get -b source must be run with root equivilency in
order to pass dh_testroot?
I have the following line in my /etc/apt/apt.conf:
DPkg::Build-Options -rfakeroot -b -uc;
This should configure apt-get -b source package to create unsigned
binary packages as a normal user
Sam,
Does this mean apt-get -b source must be run with root equivilency in
order to pass dh_testroot?
I have the following line in my /etc/apt/apt.conf:
DPkg::Build-Options -rfakeroot -b -uc;
This should configure apt-get -b source package to create unsigned
binary packages as a normal user
10 Dec 2002 20:20, Joe Nahmias wrote:
Sean, Matthew, and anyone else who wants to test the package:
You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install them
manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure suitable to be
an apt source (anyone care to enlighten me
.
Version: 0.81
Homepage: http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/
ITP: Bug #160810 -- http://bugs.debian.org/160810
Source i386 debs: http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian/
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), zlib1g-dev, svgalibg1-dev, libsdl1.2-dev
Thanks,
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean, Matthew, and anyone else who wants to test the package:
You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install them
manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure suitable to be
an apt source (anyone care to enlighten
.
Version: 0.81
Homepage: http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/
ITP: Bug #160810 -- http://bugs.debian.org/160810
Source i386 debs: http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian/
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), zlib1g-dev, svgalibg1-dev, libsdl1.2-dev
Thanks,
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean, Matthew, and anyone else who wants to test the package:
You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install them
manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure suitable to be
an apt source (anyone care to enlighten
of FCE Ultra, for use in the linux console.
fceu-doc - The documentation common to both.
Version: 0.81
Homepage: http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/
Source 1386 debs: http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian/
Thanks,
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - I have not applied to the NM process yet
of FCE Ultra, for use in the linux console.
fceu-doc - The documentation common to both.
Version: 0.81
Homepage: http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/
Source 1386 debs: http://www.cooper.edu/~nahmia/debian/
Thanks,
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - I have not applied to the NM process yet
for your help!
Joe Nahmias
first-time Debian packager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Please cc me on replies as I am not subscribed to the list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92VkPKl23+OYWEqURAqljAJwJX1XPL/20L59a1RekLRpSYXRtWgCfc6sF
Ld/pfo9IiscAyLKAI7UWBao=
=3KZY
.
Thanks for your help!
Joe Nahmias
first-time Debian packager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Please cc me on replies as I am not subscribed to the list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92VkPKl23+OYWEqURAqljAJwJX1XPL/20L59a1RekLRpSYXRtWgCfc6sF
Ld/pfo9IiscAyLKAI7UWBao
to be
unable to... Should I file a bug against dpkg??
Anyways, thanks to everyone who responded to my pleas for help!
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/fceu-0.81 $ dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -n
's/^Maintainer: //p'
Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/fceu-0.81 $ gpg
Hello list,
I am trying to package FCE Ultra (bug #160810), however when I
come to the crucial `dpkg-buildpackage` step, I get the following error
message:
gpg: skipped 'Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED]': secret key not available
However I am able to see my secret key when I issue
* Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-13 18:34]:
gpg: skipped 'Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED]': secret key not available
However I am able to see my secret key when I issue the command
`gpg --list-secret-keys`, and I am able to sign files.
The Maintainer: field in debian/control
94 matches
Mail list logo
