Hi,
I'm having an issue with distributing a .deb package that has a dependency
on another .deb package that might not be in an available repository (or the
target may not have a network connection at the time of installation). What
I'd like to do, ideally, is embed the dependency inside the
with that.
Clancy
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:03:06PM -0700, Joe Smith wrote:
Thanks Mike. Sorted that issue out. Didn't realize I'd commented out
dh_makeshlibs =)
Another issue sprung up, though. What I need to be able
actually have to make libngi3-0.9 and libngi3-0.8
packages as separate entities? Or is there a way to make a package not
replace itself if there's something using it?
C
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 04:09:21PM -0700, Joe Smith
is
fine), change control, changelog and rename the include and dirs files.
C
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Joe Smith spam...@shaw.ca wrote:
Thanks Mike. Sorted that issue out. Didn't realize I'd commented out
dh_makeshlibs =)
Another issue sprung up, though. What I need to be able to do now
Hi,
I'm having an issue getting dpkg-shlibdeps to resolve dependencies properly.
The output lists:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unable to find dependency information for shared
library libmylib-0.8 (soname 0, path libmylib-0.8.so.0, dependency field
Depends)
But I can run dpkg -S libmylib-0.8 and
Master Kernel master.kernel.cont...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:4a3cf0a0.1040...@gmail.com...
Theoretically speaking, what if I found someone within the Debian
community with a trusted identity who could package the program from
source for me, and then upload it. Could I then remain
Thibaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed that one of my packages, yorick-ml4, is completely broken
on amd64 and presumably all other 64-bit archs. Because the package is
unusable on all amd64 machines (and more), I believe this is a release
critical bug (which I know how to
Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 06:48:48PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Where can we find your package?
My mistake, gmail interpreted your signed message as an attachment.
Other User Agents did the same thing. I think it was the Application/pgp
mimetype.
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Ben Finney wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Block by (and a few other control mechanisms) aren't support at
submit@ time; it's a valid
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's close. Bugs Everywhere is (like 'ditrack') designed to have the
bug database for a project in a DVCS keep its bug database in the
version-controlled files. It does this by maintaining a bug database
in a hidden
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
This package is already in the archive, and I have DM upload rights for
it.
A few days ago I noticed this package doesn't work on non 32bits
architectures so
Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
I think, Linux should be fun, so the work will get best quality.
On that you are definately not alone. Linus Torvalds himself agrees, as does
nearly everybody involved with this project.
However, even fun things can be frustrating on
Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/9/1, Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The gentoo short package description is an outgoing mail processor.
That seems to fit what you found, and may better convey the purpose of
the
package.
I recommend you
Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Did you run lintian against the .changes file? I downloaded your
sources from mentors, built the package and ran lintian on it and
got:
That test likely changed recently.
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That said, it's also proper to just fix (wishlist) bugs on the way, without
having them in the BTS first. But I like bugs in the BTS too :)
For the documentation update that makes sense, but the note about the
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was curious about this myself, so I checked
URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/anubis/manual/html_mono/anubis.html:
# GNU Anubis is an SMTP message submission daemon. Its purpose is to
# receive the outgoing message,
andremachado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I read the pages at[0], [1], [2], [3], [4] but did not find a suitable
guide /
recommendation for non-english characters.
Are foreign (UTF-8) characters accepted into the uid of a key?
My uid has a é letter and I
Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:46:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Dear mentors,
[..]
It builds these binary packages:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, it isn't. [1]
Marc
Footnotes:
[1] Hint: All build logs contain a version string.
Is that not the SVN repository for sbuild, et al?
The whole thing is a bit confusing.
The alioth Buildd-tools project
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Mentors,
I would like to do a mass rebuild of at least a significant part of the
archive to investigate a potential problem on G5 running the powerpc
port. I am currently trying to use
Nicholas Jefferson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package inferno.
* Package name: inferno
Version : 20070202-1
Upstream Author : Vita Nuova Holdings Limited [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wrt/ lintian, as long as the packages do work, the purely optional
matter of style questions[0] should never be part of any lintian check
(lintian shall only check for policy
Shachar Shemesh wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.9.46-1
of my package gambas2. There is a previous version uploaded to
experimental.
After the upstream author has frozen the gambas2 byte
Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
During a recent upgrade of my Debian Sid box, I noticed the
following changelog entry:
f-spot (0.2.2-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
* Update to 0.2.2 upstream
Perhaps I've already missed a discussion on this. If so,
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:30:03 -0300, andremachado
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The executable-not-elf-or-script I guess will continue. Jar, war,
policy and stamp are generated by the compilation and are the results.
I don't
Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 18/10/06, Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, hardly any (none?) of the original contributors and coders of
LiDIA are working on it anymore. I was nagging its sole maintainer
about
Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
to
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The reason, why I ask: I have 2 bugs open in a package and both only
apply to Woody, but not to Sarge, Etch or Sid. So I want to know, when
or under which circumstances I can close or drop them.
Considering that there
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
IANADD, and have no comment or answers for the first part.
And, another question, should the -indep package Depend: on the -dep
one? Its files are, on the whole, useles without it, but I don't
Matej Kosik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So he can be contacted and is willing to reconsider the licensing of
`cmarrows'.
He used some code from Donald E. Knuth's CM fonts (METAFONT code) as
well as some code copyrighted (as noted above) by AMS (also METAFONT
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:55:40PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ITP is #213361. The package is foo-clean; the packaging is
trivial (clean
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ITP is #213361. The package is foo-clean; the packaging is
trivial (clean autotoolage).
What is this foo package you keep talking about?
I know of lintian, linda, puiparts, but not foo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Jari Aalto+mail.linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's pretty much it to activate dpatch support. You have to generate
the individual patches (with any means confortable to you) and convert
them into dpatch format.
Dpatch really needs better instuctions.
On 6/17/06, Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The whole DK thing is experimental, but for those wishing to experiment,
at
least Exim and SpamAssassin are prepared to use these prospective
packages.
It is also my understanding that Yahoo's license, unlike Microsoft's
SenderID
Michael Tautschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is a Serious bug, and is a FTBFS, so AIUI, it is RC. So it can be filex
in a NMU. However, According the the Developer's reference, only DD's can
NMU. If that is true, then sponsored NMU are not allowed.
Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, remember that there are four distinct parts to language
comprehension.
Reading, writing, listening, and speaking.
Perhaps you feel I don't understand this, but as I deal with this on a
daily basis, I assure you I
Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on my understanding of Japanese law, the original document being
in Japanese is the one that is legally binding, even if the author makes
an English translation. Other jurisdictions may accept a hypothetical
English
Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only if an adequate
English version was available [1], pruning the Japanese docs would be
an option IMO (and only because ~99.9% of Japanese people have good
command of English).
You must have a very different
Pascal Hakim wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:09:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Let's say that the previous post contained some references about the
sites
this package blocks. If I made murphy autolearn the package's name to
mark
it as spam, will I get
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, the word dnscruft has a spam ratio of no more than 50% (due to the
recent ITP), thus it doesn't contribute towards a given post's SA score.
On the other hand, though:
Ok, then why did you not actually use the name
Rainer Dorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I tried to package cpuinfo but it seems that the files in debian/tmp did
not
make it into the .deb file:
debian/tmp is only used if debian/compat does not exist or contains '1'.
My guess is that your package
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I must ask why do people dislike the autotools? Are there really
problems that outweigh the benefits of being able to compile the program
on strange architectures with little
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Is there a document describing software packaging good practices for
general use, not specific to Debian, preferably in electronic form?
You might be looking for autoconf/automake (although it's a bit rusty,
and
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now when I install cream-doc (0.34) it looks like this:
$ dpkg -i cream-doc_0.34-2_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package cream-doc.
dpkg: considering removing cream in favour of cream-doc ...
dpkg: yes, will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:27:54PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Panu Kalliokoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup, seems the ITP was erronously closed by some totally unrelated
control message... if I understand
Panu Kalliokoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup, seems the ITP was erronously closed by some totally unrelated
control message... if I understand correctly. Anyway, I contacted the
submitter of the ITP.
Panu
If you are talking about
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 01:24 -0600 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
That is, to have a .dpatch file whose purpose is to unpack the tarball
on 'patch' and delete the tree on 'unpatch'.
But as I said: Such a patch would be
Kevin B. McCarty wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also (and this is quite a dumb question), when the end user wants to use
the debug package, what magical options does s/he give to gdb when
running a program so that gdb knows where to find the debugging
information? Is additional setup
Russ Allbery said:
I hate to say this, since actually implementing it is a lot of work in
supporting programs like debhelper, but if the debconf-2.0 pseudopackage
was introduced prior to a new feature in the debconf interface there needs
to be a debconf-2.1 or debconf-3.0 as well. If cdebconf
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed, many packages aren't copyrighted by individual person[s];
check out the 'coreutils' package, the copyright of which is held by
some funky group called the 'free the software foundation'.
I'm hoping you are
Julien Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I'm searching a sponsor for the cmus package, here is a copy of the
bugreport:
Please re-send using RFS: in the subject (Rather than ITP) to indicate a
RequestForSponsor.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 06:00:48PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
Package freetype1-tools owns
Jose Carlos do Nascimento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will open bug against gcc4 and gcc3.4.
Please make sure that the libraries listed below were rebuilt with g++3.4
and it was not trying to use versions compiled with g++3.0
../gb/libgb.a ../prof/libprof.a
David D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David, please be certain that this does not mess up anachron, and that it
obeys /etc/cron.daily/ etc.
Why? Because quite simply despite mcron being intended to do things
differently from dixie cron, it still needs to
Nicolas Weyland wrote:
In the maintainer guide it's written that you have to write
differences between the normal and the debian version. But if
there are important things whiche aren't in the upstream's
Readme, can I add them there or will my package be rejected?
In general, you should just
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:51:09AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
On 11-Sep-2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005, Joe Smith wrote:
Yes. But AFAIK there are absolutely no plans to provide
Eddy Petrisor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
The application I want to package, qingy, is in fact a replacement for
getty and it needs to modify /etc/inittab.
No qingy is a replacement for mingetty, or for the vt portion of agetty.
Qingy does not replace
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005, Eddy Petri?or wrote:
The application I want to package, qingy, is in fact a replacement for
getty and it needs to modify /etc/inittab.
Don't. /etc/inittab is critical infrastructure on
Guanglei Xiong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi mentors,
I have packaged InsightToolkit (www.itk.org) for Debian. This is my first
time of packaging. I am trying to find if anyone can check and upload
it. Thanks!
Guanglei Xiong
Ok. Please be certain that you
I would prefer not to have to regenerate the documentation from TeX
for the timebeing since it relies on TeX modules that are not yet part
of Debian. Hopefully future Debian releases of the PSTricks packages
will remedy this situation making this a sensible option. It would
also seem a bit
Multiple binaries often have have the same manpage, especially if the two
programs are identical except for name, or do the oposite of each other.
Examples (based on a cygwin system, so these might not hold true in debian):
gunzip, gzip, and zcat
bzip2, bunzip2, bzcat and bz2recover
grep,
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neil McGovern wrote:
While I have no idea what the proble was for Bastian, i just discovered
today why the page did not display correctly for me. That is because i was
using Fx's adblock extention with filterset G,
Just to chime in:
IMNSHO:
It really makes little difference if software is packaged in main or
contrib. The way I see it both have software available under a
DFSG-complient licence.
Because sometimes there is software in contrib that actually is usable
without non-free software, although it
Note however that perl is probably correct, as it provides 'perldoc', which
is a dummy file, but people generally expect it to work. To work it requires
perldoc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FWIW, I would not touch SNEeSe or any fragment derived from it with a
ten-foot pole unless they can tell you where sneese.dat came from and
what's in it.
Well file(1) said it is an allegro datafile, so I apt-get'ed liballegro-dev
and try extracting it using 'dat -x SNEESE.DAT *'.
It contains
The upstream folks are planning to split cogito and git into two separate
packages. I requested (and they seemed to agree) that they change the
package name from git to something else before then. Hopefully they'll
see the light and try to play nice with the rest of the world.
Hmm... It
66 matches
Mail list logo
