Hi Andreas,
On 14-03-2020 14:30, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Paul,
[...]
> Any help would be welcome
I can't help you with this.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 06-02-2020 00:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 22:42 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:22 PM Christian Barcenas
>> wrote:
>>> Because this changes the versioning scheme from kernel releases
>>> (libbpf-dev and libbpf0 currently are at 5.4.13-1 in
Hi Feri,
Please CC me on reply.
>> I think I understand the rest, although I don't know whether the
>> autopkgtest regression blocks migration indefinitely. That would be
>> unfortunate, because unstable pcs needs unstable pacemaker, so they
>> deadlock...
>
> I think you will need to ask the
Hi Andreas
On 10-05-18 22:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:57:54PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> |
>> | ftp.debian.org is the right pseudo-package for removal (of the 0.8-1
>> | packages) from unstable.
>>
>> Ok, thanks, filed as #898354.
>
> Seems that bug is somehow
Hi,
On 10-05-18 19:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 10 May 2018 at 19:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> | On 10-05-18 14:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Sorry about that. It must have been an old packaging oversight that only
> came
> | > to light now -- DBI never had a src/ dire
Hi Dir,
On 10-05-18 14:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Sorry about that. It must have been an old packaging oversight that only came
> to light now -- DBI never had a src/ directory and should have been 'all' all
> along.
>
> Any idea how we can correct that at the repo? Shall we file a bug with
control: tags -1 -help
On 20-12-15 15:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I am looking into fixing bug 807353¹ against my package dbconfig-common.
> dbconfig-common is written in shell, such that it can easily be sourced
> and used in maintainer scripts. The issue is that when you call a
> sour
control: tags -1 help
Hi all,
I am looking into fixing bug 807353¹ against my package dbconfig-common.
dbconfig-common is written in shell, such that it can easily be sourced
and used in maintainer scripts. The issue is that when you call a
sourced function in the test part of an if-then-fi
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Vincent
On 16-11-15 00:03, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Here is the changelog for the version 2.1.1.
Looks good. I just ran debmake -k on the copyright file and it found one
missing license: GPL-2+ on test/simulation/test.common. I think the tool
is right.
You didn't push the
Hi Vincent,
On 17-09-15 22:03, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Le jeu. 17 sept. 2015 à 19:58, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> a écrit :
> I will then revert commit e88f1460f3e.
>> As I would call this a regression, I rather have it fixed in our current
>> upload. And I thi
Hi Vincent,
On 16-09-15 22:13, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Le mer. 16 sept. 2015 à 19:57, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> a écrit :
>> Commit e88f1460f3e now prevents the upstream NEWS file to be installed
>> as upstream changelog. I rather have that stayed in. You pr
Building right now.
On 15-09-15 23:08, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> for clarifying:
>
> The NEWS.Debian file will be used while updating the package:
> If you write a new entry into NEWS.Debian, this new entry will be shown
> while running apt-get install.
And from man dh_installchangelogs:
Hi Vincent,
On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote:
> I also pushed the changes to the git repository.
Commit e88f1460f3e now prevents the upstream NEWS file to be installed
as upstream changelog. I rather have that stayed in. You probably should
call "dh_installchangelogs NEWS debian/NEWS" or
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Vincent,
On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹?
Sure, my dashboard told me that there was a new chrony, so I was
expecting this e-mail. Surprisingly it was not to package that. Could
you also fix the watch file, as you
On 15-09-15 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote:
>> Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹?
>
> Sure, my dashboard told me that there was a new chrony, so I was
> expecting this e-mail. Surprisingly it was not to package that. Could
> y
Hi Vincent,
On 24-08-15 23:52, Vincent Blut wrote:
Which file do you have in common with ntp? Please re-read ¹.
I guess I’ve been misled by § 7.6.2! The previous section shows the
usage of the 'replaces:' field for packages providing *files* already
provided by another package. However,
Hi Vincent,
[I am merging the e-mails you send yesterday to make the thread easier
again.]
On 20-08-15 18:12, Vincent Blut wrote:
Le jeu. 20 août 2015 à 12:10, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org a écrit :
On 19-08-15 21:29, Vincent Blut wrote:
Please add the CVE numbers that were fixed by upstream
Hi
On 20-08-15 22:33, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Hello Vincent,
Vincent Blut wrote on 2015-08-20 18:36:
features. By the way, if I want to close these outdated bug reports,
what’s
the canonical way to do it? I guess I can’t do that from d/changelog?
do it in the changelog: e.g. LP:
Hi Vincent,
Live from Debconf15.
On 19-08-15 21:29, Vincent Blut wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package chrony
Please note this is a first manual inspection. Not all items are
critical, most are just nitpicks or tips or questions.
Please add the CVE numbers that were fixed by
Hi
On 20-08-15 12:10, Paul Gevers wrote:
Are the man pages regrenerated
Could you check with upstream that he/she really is generating the man
pages by hand in groff format? If not, ask him to include the source.
Are (new) examples installed
Is there a reason why you don't install
control: owner -1 !
On 19-08-15 21:29, Vincent Blut wrote:
So, nobody’s interested to see chrony updated ? ;-)
I will look at it soon.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
You can also check how I solved this in dbconfig-common in the
dbc_get_app_pass function that is called during configure of any package
that depends on dbconfig-common:
https://sources.debian.net/src/dbconfig-common/1.8.52/dpkg/common/#L853
Although in this case the non-interactive mode is easier
On 28-04-15 14:26, Christopher Baines wrote:
This happens when the package is installed, and I am running
dpkg-reconfigure. The manpage seems to suggest that this can happen for
three reasons:
Debconf decides if the question is actually displayed, based on its
priority, and whether the user
Hi
On 24-04-15 06:02, Amul Shah wrote:
While this fix works, it strikes me as not completely correct because
21 # Set up locale support in the pbuilder environment
22 override_dh_auto_build:
23 mkdir -p debian/tmp/locale/
24 localedef -f UTF-8 -i en_US
Hi João,
I haven't used dquilt in a while (its use has rapidly decrease since
source format 3) but have you checked that refreshing with plain quilt
(without the d) solves the issue? To understand the issue, you may even
compare the patch file before and after quilt refresh to see what has
On 03-04-15 17:55, Felix Natter wrote:
does nobody have an opinion on this?
In short: Is it better to have _a lot_ of beta gbp import-origs, commits
that are reverted/superceded etc. OR
develop on a private repository and copy the debian/* changes to alioth
on a release?
If this means that
On 22-03-15 06:39, Riley Baird wrote:
-The upstream tarball contains embedded code copies of the java
version of antlr, which violates Debian policy.
This depends on the license, but in general this statement is not
completely true.
You'll need to repack
the tarball and add +ds to the
Hi Jörg,
Ping. Any progress on xmlrpc-c?
On 10-01-15 21:35, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 10-01-15 20:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
I think you don't need to add the version to the dpkg-gensymbols call,
and if you do, why strip the Debian part of the version? Doesn't
dh_makeshlibs call dpkg-gensymbols
Hi all,
I am wondering about the following, what is the practical difference in
a shell script between
[ $foo ] and [ -n $foo ]
or
[ ! $foo ] and [ -z $foo ]
Looking up their literal meaning shows that they are different of
course, but is there also a practical difference?
Paul
signature.asc
On 10-01-15 20:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
I think you don't need to add the version to the dpkg-gensymbols call,
and if you do, why strip the Debian part of the version? Doesn't
dh_makeshlibs call dpkg-gensymbols itself? So if you try to override
anything, shouldn't the dpkg-gensymbols calls
Hello Jörg,
On 07-01-15 13:12, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
Am Montag, den 05.01.2015, 21:55 +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 30-12-14 21:17, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
Am Montag, den 29.12.2014, 11:13 +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 26-12-14 20:48, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
Sure, saw that. I guess you
Hi Jörg,
On 30-12-14 21:17, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
first sorry for my late answer. I was i little bit ooo and then the
31C3.
No problem. Also sorry I didn't replied sooner.
Am Montag, den 29.12.2014, 11:13 +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 26-12-14 20:48, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
Ironically
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Jörg,
On 26-12-14 20:48, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xmlrpc-c
I am willing to help, review below is incomplete yet though (just
scanned the changes once).
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
Control: owner -1 !
Judging the response of Sebastian in bug 768764, he doesn't have time
anymore. Building right now, uploading after dinner...
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
On 19-11-14 07:57, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-back.
Building now, etc...
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
On 19-11-14 22:14, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-base.
Building soon, etc...
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
On 15-11-14 16:53, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-sqlclient.
You found one. As always I build from git, I assume that is all right.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: owner -1 !
On 11-11-14 19:47, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rsskit.
It builds these binary packages:
This upload is targeted for t-p-u; the debdiff was pre-approved by the
release team (release.d.o #768923).
Checking, building etc...
Paul
On 26-10-14 07:37, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Anny suggestion for a solution since I have no idea about those
other architectures?
Drop the build-dep on openmpi-gcc.
You must make sure that the first build dependency in a set of
alternative build-deps is always installable, otherwise it's going
-mentors@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have seen this before and I (as a maintainer) don't understand this
comment so bold as it is put here. I would say that overrides can help
you to see which items you (or your sponsee¹ in case of sponsorship)
already
On 04-10-14 00:44, Paul Wise wrote:
They are also not for
experimental, pedantic or info level issues. So all of these issues
should either be ignored or fixed but not overridden.
I have seen this before and I (as a maintainer) don't understand this
comment so bold as it is put here. I would
Hi Marc,
On 05-09-14 16:29, Eriberto Mota wrote:
Not mandatory or recommended by policy. However, a good practice
commonly requested by all sponsors to allow the control of the code by
you or any external people. You must implement it.
Just to be sure, I read this as You must implement it if
Hi all,
I am trying to investigate why emacspeak has a piuparts purge failure
[1]. It fails because there are files in /root/.gnupg/. As emacspeak
doesn't depend on gnupg and doesn't do anything of itself with gnupg, I
don't have a clear picture of where to start. It seems that emacspeak is
the
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
On 24-07-14 23:08, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zipper.app.
You found one one. Building right now (for real), but still I have some
remarks that I like you to fix next time:
* If suggests are not installed, is the
Hi Yavor,
Several new remarks. When they are resolved (by an explanation or a fix)
I will build and upload.
- library files are not in /usr/lib anymore but in
/usr/lib/talksoup.app/ . As far as I can tell this is good, but it is
not documented in changelog.
- d/copyright:
* years of Adrew,
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On 29-07-14 12:39, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-examples.
Some remarks, when they are resolved I think I will upload.
* copyright file needs updated dates (also in the negative direction)
*
: *** [clean] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit
status 2
Description: Debian policy 12.1 says that man pages should be installed
in sections 1 to 9.
Author: Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org
--- a/GNUstep/lynkeos.1
+++ b/GNUstep/lynkeos.1
@@ -1,6 +1,6
Control: tags -1 +pending -moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On 06-08-14 13:25, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I find the man page rather short, is it reasonable to improve it?
I have extended it as much as I could.
Looks much better now, thanks.
I didn't check yet, but aren't you know installing the d/docs adn
Hi Yavor,
This bug was already closed, but I already had a look...
On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 04:57:13 +0300 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gtamsanalyzer.app.
gtamsanalyzer.app - Qualitative Research Software for GNUstep
First remark, I don't really
Hi Yavor,
On 04-08-14 22:12, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Paul Gevers wrote:
Are there any sources for the png/wav in Resources ?
There's a Blender file (cuckoo.blend) in the top directory.
Then I really suggest to create the images (and the wav?) from that file
during building. I share the opinion
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:15:41 +0300 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package talksoup.app.
Some remarks:
Icon in desktop file in /usr/lib/
Text about license file on Debian systems does not mention the
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 21:20:42 +0300 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lynkeos.app.
Some remarks in random order:
The location of icon in the desktop file point to /usr/lib/
Could you add tilde
Control: tags -1 pending
On 06-08-14 13:57, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Then I really suggest to create the images (and the wav?) from that
file during building. I share the opinion of many (most?) DD's that
the only way to make sure that we can build from sources with tools
available in Debian is
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:19:24 +0300 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package aclock.app.
I have several (in random order) remarks:
Are there any sources for the png/wav in Resources ?
The man page is
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 10:45:38 +0300 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gridlock.app.
I have several (in random order) remarks:
Please acknowledge nmus (even if the content is nearly all yours)
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:50:16 +0300 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gorm.app.
I have several (in random order) remarks:
I find the man page rather short, is it reasonable to improve it?
I
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
On 18-07-14 21:56, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-sqlclient.
As I sponsored the initial upload, I will take this one as well.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 15-07-14 18:52, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Paul Gevers wrote:
Whatever you do, to prevent accidental usage of a pre-build object
file it is very common to at least clean them.
It is done by `make distclean'.
I hate to disagree, but for me it doesn't. After `make distclean` the
files are still
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
Before I upload this package to the new queue, could you please comment
on the lintian errors about missing source?
I am looking for a statement like: I added lintian overrides for these
files as the source is available several directories
Hi Yavor,
And an additional remark: the COPYING file and the headers in several
(all?) source files don't match. The COPYING file says LGPL-2.1+ while
the headers say LGPL-2+. Please update your d/copyright file to match
the situation.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 15-07-14 14:54, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Paul Gevers wrote:
Before I upload this package to the new queue, could you please
comment on the lintian errors about missing source?
The reason for these is gnustep-make's incapable dist rule, combined
with not so careful upstream.
I am looking
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
I like the Description of the packages to be consistent. Either System
Preferences *is* or System Preferences *are*. I think the second option
is the logic one considering the name, but otherwise you need something
like The System Preferences
On 15-07-14 16:05, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Well, the source has to be DFSG-free. How we guarantee that usually is
by building everything from source during the build. If you don't want
to build it, you have to remove them from source and repack
I don't understand. It is quite common for a
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 pending
I uploaded the package, but may I request that next time you add a
symbols file so that depending packages get a properly versioned dependency?
See lintian info tag:
I: libperformance0.5: no-symbols-control-file
usr/lib/libPerformance.so.0.5.0
N:
N:
On 15-07-14 18:46, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Paul Gevers wrote:
I uploaded the package, but may I request that next time you add a
symbols file so that depending packages get a properly versioned
dependency?
Symbols files are ultimately unapplicable for Objective-C libraries
(see #749202
Hi Yavor,
On 01-07-14 17:13, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-sqlclient.
libsqlclient1.7 - SQL client library for GNUstep (runtime library)
This package contains files in an unversioned sub-directory of /usr/lib/
This is a violation of Debian policy §8.2
On 15-07-14 21:16, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Paul Gevers wrote:
libsqlclient1.7 - SQL client library for GNUstep (runtime library)
This package contains files in an unversioned sub-directory of /usr/lib/
This is a violation of Debian policy §8.2
Right, I totally missed that...
I'm not sure
Control: owner -1
Control: pending -1
On 11-06-14 06:12, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lusernet.app.
I am building and uploading shortly, however, please add the following
to your git tree in debian/copyright (preferably you figure out the
dates of the
On 04-07-14 22:03, Sergey Shnatsel Davidoff wrote:
Should I request splitting these fonts into individual packages? If yes,
how do I do that?
You can request a split. File it as a wishlist bug against the providing
package (as you would with any bug). Also prepare yourself to get
wontfix as a
Hi Yavor,
On 27-05-14 02:57, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-gui.
I can't promise that I will upload the package, but if you can push your
changes to the packaging git I promise that I will have a look. (I
prefer the git over just the package as it makes
On 04-07-14 22:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
I can't promise that I will upload the package, but if you can push your
changes to the packaging git I promise that I will have a look.
Never mind, I was fooled by the web interface of gitweb [1], which
didn't show the changes of the experimental branch
On 20-06-14 07:55, Guido van Steen wrote:
3. remove the empty directory /etc/apt.conf.d that shouldn't exits.
More precise:
3. remove the empty directory /etc/apt.conf.d if it is empty.
well, the command rmdir only removes a dir when it is empty. I think you
already got the answer to do
On 14-05-14 05:39, Paul Wise wrote:
(but not in a package build context).
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir . input.ods
I do use it during packaging. Well, soffice as command, but I assume
that is a synonym. (Package: winff)
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 24-04-14 20:41, Don Armstrong wrote:
The cases where you should split are generally really obvious; if it's
not clear, ask here or in #debian-mentors, and you'll get some
reasonable advice.
Ok, so let me show one of the two issues I have at hand (the other is
currently being discussed on
Hi all,
In the last couple of days, the following came up multiple times.
Splitting binary packages adds to the total amount of packages in
Debian. I have heard that (some) people are very careful before they
decide to do that. What is the argument? I can come up with one, but I
wonder if there
On 22-03-14 13:33, Nico Schlömer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm packaging a library libA which depends on a header-only library
libB. Obviously I need libB to be present whenever I build an
executable against libA. Where in debian/control will I have to fill
in libB?
If I am correct, you should have
Hi Bas,
[ Sorry, no intent to sponsor this right now, but ... ]
On 15-02-14 03:12, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qgis
This package is part of a proposed transition (by you). You would do
well to at least mention this fact in your RFS.
Paul
signature.asc
On 06-02-14 22:04, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package chrony
If nobody beats me to it, I will have a look. Feel free to bug me if I
haven't responded within a week.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06-02-14 22:04, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package chrony
From the Debian side this looks trivial and I think I will upload as is,
but some remarks still.
- Upstream FAQ removed two questions and part of the answer to one
question is now part of the answer to
Hi Joachim,
On 08-02-14 18:51, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
- Your watch file doesn't work, please find attached a version that
works and at the same time takes advantage of the fact that upstream
signs its releases. You need the also attached keyring for that but feel
free to generate that
Control: owner 736085 !
On 19-01-14 16:41, Graham Inggs wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to package doublecmd:
Interesting that I have missed this the first time that you did this
work. Funny thing is that we are trying to get things related to
FreePascal into one team, so I
Hi Graham,
On 19-01-14 16:41, Graham Inggs wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to package doublecmd:
By source and binary inspection:
- Some (if not all, I am unsure) of your Conflicts are unneeded, Breaks
is good enough. Please read [1] and following paragraphs carefully again.
-
[Are you subscribed to debian-mentors? CC'ing you just in case you're not].
On 05-01-14 12:42, Bamm wrote:
I'm Bamm from the Philippines. I'm new to this list
Welcome.
and I hope to gain advice how to package for Debian.
Have you read the front page of https://mentors.debian.net/ If it is
On 05-01-14 14:23, Bamm wrote:
Please file an ITP (Intend to package) bug against the WNPP (pseudo)
package. You should use the reportbug command for that, as it gives you
the proper template to file out.
Thanks! Where do I report the ITP bug? Is there an online form, e.g.,
bugzilla?
$
On 02-01-14 20:44, Russ Allbery wrote:
Be aware of one gotcha: the destination column in *.install files
specifies the destination *directory*, not file name. You cannot use
dh_install to rename files;
Except if you build depend on dh-exec and use it (The man page is good,
so I am not going
Control: -1 pending
On 30-11-13 11:05, Graham Inggs wrote:
I've pushed some commits to the git on collab-maint.
I added a comment about the overridden Lintian spelling error
warnings, rewrote the package descriptions, merged the changes I had
made in d/control into d/control.in and
On 21-11-13 16:28, Graham Inggs wrote:
I have looked, but don't think there is anything I can fix there.
Hmm, than I will leave some comments here and there.
And, as you have been working on silencing lintian, why have you not
tried to fix the extended-description-is-probably-too-short info
On 21-11-13 19:17, Felix Natter wrote:
1. integrate http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/fixcrlf.html upstream
(generate tarball, extract, fix line endings, generate tarball)
Sound like a good solution.
2. write a get-orig-source target that does the same?
If yes, shall I append +dfsg1 to the
On 14-11-13 21:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
Would you mind creating a VCS repository on Alioth (collab-maint comes
to mind) to ease further QA maintenance?
That's a good idea. I will do that.
Alioth is down due to broken disk raid, so you'll have to wait for now.
Alioth is up again
On 13-11-13 14:46, Graham Inggs wrote:
Isn't it (easily) possible to fix these spelling errors, or are they
false positives? If you stick to the overrides, please document why in
the override file.
Well, they occur in non-English messages so I would say false positives,
but perhaps the best
Control: owner -1 !
On 12-11-13 11:01, Graham Inggs wrote:
* Override remaining Lintian spelling error warnings.
Isn't it (easily) possible to fix these spelling errors, or are they
false positives? If you stick to the overrides, please document why in
the override file.
Would you mind
[A review of part of the review]
On 09-11-13 16:51, Daniel Lintott wrote:
I'm also fairly new to reviewing, so forgive me if I miss something!
1. As your package is not yet in debian, the entries in debian/changelog
should be merged to a single entry, for the version of the package that
will
On 10/13/13 19:24, Graham Inggs wrote:
If dx-doc and dxsamples are not installed, dx still functions, except
that the online help and samples are not available.
My reasoning was that if either dx-doc or dxsamples were installed on
their own, without dx, there would be no change in their
Hi Graham,
I hope this is my last comment in this bug ;)
On 11-10-13 17:37, Graham Inggs wrote:
I agree that in most cases you would want the symlinks in the package
that provides the target files.
I think an exception would be where there is not a strong dependence
(either way) between the
On 07-10-13 14:47, Graham Inggs wrote:
On 05/10/2013 19:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
What I intended you to do is to state the above also in bug 412811, so
that it is clear for people looking at that bug report. And when you
communicate with debian-legal, make sure the bug is in CC.
I will do. I
On 05-10-13 09:23, Graham Inggs wrote:
I have completed the changes in dx (getting dxexec to run on kfreebsd)
and I think both packages are now ready for sponsoring.
This week I have more time. I will try to look at both soon.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 28-09-13 11:15, Graham Inggs wrote:
Could you please tag bug 412811 (new upstream version) as wont-fix if
you still believe it is not fixable (please check).
I did check on this with the previous maintainer and I intend to get the
opinion of debian-legal on how to proceed. It may be
Control: owner -1 !
On 27-09-13 17:09, Graham Inggs wrote:
* Package name: dxsamples
Version : 4.2.0-2
Could you please tag bug 412811 (new upstream version) as wont-fix if
you still believe it is not fixable (please check).
And could you please at least comment on bug 173709
://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/doublecmd-help.git
Regards
Paul, for
Graham Inggs
Original Message
Subject:A favour please?
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:58:20 +0200
From: Graham Inggs graham.in...@gmail.com
To: Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org
Hi Paul
Could you
Hi Beco,
Welcome.
On 23-09-13 21:39, Beco wrote:
After some time programming my own softwares to solve little problems,
scientific problems, and some useful exercises to teach C, I decided
it's time to do another step. I am ready to help a little more,
starting with packaging one little guy
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
