On 11.05.2024 09:08, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hi,
Please also announce the NMU / RFS to the package maintainer,
preferable as bug reported against it. Thanks!
The package is flagged
Control: block -1 by 1005961
On 03.05.2024 23:45, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Hi,
That would be necessary - although I don't know how to solve this in a
sensible way.
Sorry for disturbing your best intentions to bring nq back in shape -
but this problem will not disappear by ignoring it.
On 03.05.2024 22:29, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote...
Hi Christoph,
Changes since the last upload:
nq (0.5-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
.
* New upstream version (Closes: #1038937).
* Bump Standards and dh compat version, no
On 28.02.24 23:59, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hello,
dumb question: in an error I uploaded luametatex 2.11.01+ds-2 to Debian
unstable. This was a mistake, it should have been uploaded to
experimental, as it is part of the upcoming TL 2024. Is it possible to
downgrade the Debian archive (unstable
On 04.03.2024 02:09, Loren M. Lang wrote:
Hi,
Have you just tried passing through -S from gbp? As in "gbp
buildpackage -S"? It might not work if you have set a different
builder like schroot, but you can just pass --git-builder=debuild or
similar in that case.
Yes, I tried that option "-S",
On 29.02.24 00:42, Lyndon Brown wrote:
Hello,
b) Re-upload 2.10.08+ds-1 with a version number like '2.11.01+ds-3-
really2.10.08+ds-1', such that it will count as a higher version number
than the mistaken upload of 2.11.01+ds-3 and thus replace it in package
upgrades. You'd then continue with
Hello,
dumb question: in an error I uploaded luametatex 2.11.01+ds-2 to Debian
unstable. This was a mistake, it should have been uploaded to
experimental, as it is part of the upcoming TL 2024. Is it possible to
downgrade the Debian archive (unstable) to 2.10.08+ds-1 and upload the
On 23.02.24 01:15, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Hello,
Try the following:
That worked fine. Many thanks!
Hilmar
opts="searchmode=plain,repack,compression=xz,repacksuffix=+ds1,dversionmangle=s/
\+ds1//, \
pgpsigurlmangle=s%$%.asc%" \
https://api.github.com/repos/silnrsi/teckit/releases \
Hello,
I could need some help with a debian/watch file [1]. The file is mostly
not written by me, I just replaced just some regexes to introduce the
correct versioning scheme. When running "uscan -vv" it downloads
correctly upstreams tar ball, the pgp is checked and the tar ball is
On 21.01.24 11:29, Loren M. Lang wrote:
Hi,
As I don't currently have access to Salsa, I have put a copy of the
repo up on my site here:
http://www.north-winds.org/git/rpm.git
Just for the records:
hille@haka2:~$ LANG=C wget http://www.north-winds.org/git/
--2024-01-21 11:35:25--
Hi all,
sorry to bother again. I was requested to stop building package on i386
(#1057407) so libqt6 can drop the i386 support too. So, how do do I do
that? Do I have to specify (and maintain) the list of all supported
arches in the debian/control file or can I specify something like "any
Moin,
dumb question, I did not find anything in the policy.
We got #1056587: in the postinst stage of a package a broken TeX format
file is generated. The root cause is that the user placed a customized
TeX input file anywhere and changed the TEXINPUTS variable in the
environment of user
On 10.11.2023 00:37, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:06:32PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hello Mattia,
Can we override that anyhow?
Even if it was possible, how would that be of any help? You do realize
that versioning order matters for much more than whatever is shown
On 10.11.2023 03:10, Wookey wrote:
Hi Wookey,
I think your options are
1) add an epoch (which exists to deal with this sort of problem)
Well, would like to avoid it, if possible.
2) wait till the next (numerical) release 1.3.9 and upload that.
Do releases happen often? This approach
On 10/13/23 01:32, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:52:30PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi Mattia,
The upstream minor versions are always determined by letters, so I'm unsure
how to make clear that 1.3.8a+ is later than 1.3.8+. Any hints?
This is a real sad interaction
On 07.11.2023 01:07, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hi,
Hi. I see that the previous change was also requested by you (and
uploaded by someone else) due to its interaction with Texinfo.
If you feel attachment to an orphaned package, you can also adopt it.
I'm aware of that, but currently I'm not
On 07.11.2023 00:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 6/11/23 a las 23:42, Hilmar Preuße escribió:
Hi,
TeXinfo 7.1 does not migrate to testing b/c the test suite of
autoproject returns with exit code > 0. I've filed a bug report and
created a patch for the issue. The package is maintai
Hi all,
TeXinfo 7.1 does not migrate to testing b/c the test suite of
autoproject returns with exit code > 0. I've filed a bug report and
created a patch for the issue. The package is maintained by the Debian
QA group. What else can be done from my side?
Hilmar
--
Testmail
On 21.10.2023 00:32, Judit Foglszinger wrote:
Hi,
That should be opening an rt ticket with DSA, as access on those guest accounts
expires after a while.
One only needs to go through the NM page the first time.
Yes, that worked. I had to open a ticket at rt.debian.org to reactivate
the
Hi,
I have the need to access a porter box, in this situation
zelenka.debian.org. The DSA page [1] says DM's (like me) would need to
apply through the NEW members site. I went to [2] and logged in using my
salsa account, selected "Site wizard" and "Request guest account". The
resulting page
Hello,
dumb question. Currently the vcswatch for proftpd-dfsg [1] reports:
"OLD: VCS is behind the version in the archive: 1.3.8a+dfsg-1 <
1.3.8+dfsg-8."
According to deb-version(7) this is absolutely correct:
First the initial part of each string consisting entirely of non-digit
On 27.09.2023 19:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
In your case, I would start with a give back and then if this attempt
fails, contact the buildd admins.
AFAICT that option is limited to Debian Developers. So if anybody would
be so kind
Hilmar
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature
Hi all,
the package texinfo has been built successfully for architecture loong64
and is in status "Uploaded" for about a month now. I'm pretty sure there
are a lot of packages in status "BD-Uninstallable" b/c it does not get
installed.
What can be done here?
Hilmar
--
sigfault
On 13.09.2023 00:00, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:51:26 +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
My guess is different lintian versions, aka ftp-master running an
older lintian version which had a different formatting of the output.
Compare the strings:
texlive-binaries: lintian
Hello,
again a dumb question. I tried to upload texlive-bin into the NEW queue.
The upload was rejected:
texlive-binaries: lintian output: 'embedded-library usr/bin/pdftex:
poppler', automatically rejected package.
texlive-binaries: If you have a good reason, you may override this
lintian
On 04.09.2023 13:30, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
I signed the package now correctly, the processing E-Mail said:
dvisvgm_3.1.1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz has incorrect size; deleting it
Do I have to re-upload or remove the "associated files" in any way?
The ACCEPTED mail just rolled in. M
On 04.09.2023 12:42, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this does
not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the E-Mail that
the upload
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this
does not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the
E-Mail that the upload was successful and the package is processed.
In the meantime I could upload a new revision of texlive-bin, so there
is no
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 27.07.2023 00:17, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texlive-bin":
* Package name : texlive-bin
Version : 2023.20230311.66589-3
Upstream contact
Control: block 1041668 by -1
On 7/25/23 23:12, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
Add blocking statement.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hintview":
* Package name : hintview
Version : 1.3.1-1
Upstream contact : Martin Ruckert
* URL : https://hint.userweb.mwn.de/hint/hintview.html
*
On 17.07.2023 09:31, Gábor Németh wrote:
Hi,
So basically I think I'm now looking for a new sponsor. I don't think
I can file a new RFS so that my package is in the repos already.
You can file an RFS file, in case you need help with uploading to
Debian. This does not depend on if the package
Hello,
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/texlive-bin/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
On 04.07.2023 16:34, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Hi,
Thank you, you have the right idea, and this action is appreciated! :)
Assuming all of those deps are in Debian main, it sounds like the "+ds"
suffix would be the most appropriate.
I've changed the make-orig-tar script to append the string
On 04.07.2023 15:42, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Hi Nicholas,
texlive-bin (2023.20230311.66589-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream snapshot made for TL 2023.
- Remove sources of dvisvgm from orig.tar.xz, we don't build
it anyways.
Thus shouldn't the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texlive-bin":
* Package name : texlive-bin
Version : 2023.20230311.66589-1
Upstream contact : Karl Berry
* URL : https://www.tug.org/texlive/
* License
On 04.03.2023 23:30, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
srcpd (2.1.5-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1032354)
Updated to new upstream version, changed distribution to unstable.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_0x0C871C4C653C1F59.asc
Control: severity -1 normal
On 01.06.2023 09:53, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
On 17.04.2023 23:44, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Ping! Would anybody so kind to upload to experimental? That package is
prereq for the next version of ConTeXt.
Setting to Sev. normal.
Hilmar
On 20.06.2023 13:34, Ramūnas Keliuotis wrote:
Hi,
We just opensourced our NordVPN Linux application
and want to make it available from the public Debian repository.
As we are planning to do packaging and support by
ourselves, it is still not clear how to properly go
through the Debian
On 01.06.2023 09:53, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
Dear mentors,
Ping! Would anybody so kind to upload to experimental? That package is
prereq for the next version of ConTeXt.
Now that bookworm is released I changed the target distribution to
unstable and re-uploaded
On 17.04.2023 23:44, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luametatex":
* Package name : luametatex
Version : 2.10.07-1
Upstream contact : Hans Hagen
* URL : https://github.com/contextgarden/luametatex
* License
On 22.05.2023 05:52, Ko Ko Ye` wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wifi-qr":
* Package name : wifi-qr
Version : 0.2-3+18
AFAICT the version 0.2-3 has never entered Debian, hence the version you
have to use is still 0.2-3. Not sure if it will be
On 15.05.2023 18:14, Oliver Reiche wrote:
Hi Oliver,
I just updated the package again, with the upstream beta2 release.
Could you please tell me if it is acceptable for Debian that I have
build dependencies (proto files) in ./debian/third_party, with the
copyright file explicity mentioning
On 5/11/23 15:11, Oliver Reiche wrote:
Hi,
The source builds the following binary packages:
justbuild - Justbuild generic build system
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/justbuild/
If you look at that
On 06.05.2023 00:25, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
Now I need to move some files to another package. Is there an easy
method the exclude some files from this package or do I have to compile
a positive list (which might vary between versions)?
In debian/rules:
Well, errrm. I should have looked
Hi all,
sorry, dumb question: currently a Debian package contains all files it
find below usr/bin and usr/share.
hille@sid-amd64:~/t2/texlive-bin/debian$ cat texlive-binaries.install
usr/bin
usr/share
Now I need to move some files to another package. Is there an easy
method the exclude some
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 17.02.2023 23:39, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"monitoring-plugins-check-oracle-health":
Package is not finalized, I deleted it from mentors.d.o. For now I tag
the RFS bug moreinfo.
H.
--
sigfault
On 20.03.2023 16:38, Aaron Boxer wrote:
Hi Aaron,
are you subscribed to debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org ?
Thanks, Santiago. How do I contact the release team to ask about unblock ?
"According to schedule, we have frozen bookworm a bit more
(2023-03-12). This means that we are one
Am 12.02.2023 um 07:54 teilte min sun mit:
Hi,
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-collections4-java/
If you look at that link you'll see a few things, which should the
resolved. At least the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proftpd-mod-sftp-ldap":
* Package name : proftpd-mod-sftp-ldap
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream contact : TJ Saunders
* URL :
Am 07.01.2023 um 16:16 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
The NIV has to be represented in d/copyright regardless of having the
"right" wording or not.
You currently do not mention it at all. GFDL-1.3+ (no NIV) is considered
non-free, so please fix this.
I do not mind the lintian override
Am 07.01.2023 um 02:30 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Am 07.01.23 um 02:27 schrieb Bastian Germann:
Hi,
boilerplate code
boilerplate license text (in @quotation):
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Am 07.01.2023 um 02:27 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 23:49:43 +0100 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
- "license-problem-gfdl-non-official-text": override and fix.
The GFDL variant has to be GFDL-NIV-1.3+ and the short license text that
you have in d/copyright has to
Am 29.12.2022 um 18:41 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Hi.
Works, many thanks!
Would it make sense to open an issue at lintian?
Done. #1027292 .
H.
--
sigfault
Am 29.12.2022 um 16:52 teilte Jeroen Ploemen mit:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 16:14:58 +0100
Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
An override has been added, but the line, which is found to be to
long seems to move, hence lintian complains or does not complain.
What do I do?
Use an asterisk
Hi all,
I'm just building Lintian overrides and I'm struggling with a test. Here
is the output of two lintian runs with unchanged source package, limited
to the interesting lines.
hille@sid-amd64:~/devel/TeXLive/github$ lintian --tag-display-limit 0
--pedantic -I texinfo_7.0.1-3.dsc
W: texinfo
Am 29.12.2022 um 14:02 teilte Barry Scott mit:
Hi,
On Fedora/RHEL I would use mock to build a RPM from source to ensure
that I have the RPM spec file correctly written. Mock ensures that
no packages in my dev machine are used to build the RPM.
What is the debian version of that tool?
Am 19.12.2022 um 19:41 teilte Andrius Merkys mit:
On 2022-12-19 20:36, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I uploaded latexml_0.8.7-1_source.changes to Debian FTP. Until
now I just got the information that the package was received, no reject
or accept.
I requested a package rebuild (#1026239
Hi,
yesterday I uploaded latexml_0.8.7-1_source.changes to Debian FTP. Until
now I just got the information that the package was received, no reject
or accept.
I requested a package rebuild (#1026239), which was approved, but the
builders did not even start to work?
Is there a general problem
Am 25.11.2022 um 06:41 teilte David Bannon mit:
Hi David,
Is the something wrong ? If so, why no announcement ? If not, will
some one PLEASE tell me what I am doing wrong ? How I can diagnose this
problem ?
I have in the past uploaded several packages, I am not totally new to
this process.
Hi,
I'm a DM with upload permits. Recently I pushed
monitoring-plugins-check-logfiles to the archive. Would be nice if
anybody could set the upload permissions for my user id so I can
maintain the package myself:
dcut dm --uid 0x0C871C4C653C1F59 --allow=monitoring-plugins-check-logfiles
I
Am 16.11.2022 um 20:16 teilte Alexander Reichle-Schmehl mit:
Hi,
Thanks for the upload!
Just two small remarks:
* I think it would be relatively easy to add autopkgtest to the
package, allowing automatic verification of the functionality.
* Feel free to ping me for additinal
Am 08.11.2022 um 11:05 teilte Alexander Reichle-Schmehl mit:
Hi,
We are using that plugin at the company, so thanks for packaging!
I'm willing to sponsor and will try to take a closer look at it in the
evening.
Good. Thanks!
But just a first question: Mentors service says, that you
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I'm aware that there is no debian/watch file yet, I'll implement it
later. Further there seems to be some kind of test suite, which needs to
be activated.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
Am 29.09.2022 um 01:01 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
As you have added yourself to the Uploaders with
https://github.com/debian-tex/tex-gyre/commit/5b1a987a6abb0f57ee6ba4af45abab17124b03ae please mention this change instead. I checked on the
current unstable version.
OK, next try.
Am 28.09.2022 um 22:47 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
Is this a team upload? If so, please add an entry to the changelog.
I've added "* Team upload." to the top of the changelog. Now lintian
complains:
unnecessary-team-upload
The debian/changelog file refers to a "Team upload"
Am 07.06.2022 um 18:32 teilte André Flechs mit:
I added all issues to changelog as Closes.
How can I remove the tag?
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
Hilmar
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 04.06.2022 um 09:36 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Am 04.06.2022 um 00:24 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Dear mentors,
I've uploaded a new improved version of
texlive-bin/2022.20220321.62855-4, dget link is on mentors, please be so
kind to upload to the archive.
https://mentors.debian.net/debian
Am 04.06.2022 um 00:24 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Dear mentors,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
My GPG key has expired, hence I need a sponsor for this upload.
Please put the request on hold, I'll (eventually) prepare a new upload.
Hilmar
--
sigfault
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
My GPG key has expired, hence I need a sponsor for this upload.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texlive-bin":
* Package name: texlive-bin
Version : 2022.20220321.62855-4
Upstream Author : [fill in
Am 01.06.2022 um 13:16 teilte Arnaud Ferraris mit:
Hi Arnaud, hi Andrey,
You can use the "--arch-all --no-arch-any" combination of options
(--no-arch-any being the important part). Generally speaking, sbuild
provides a lot of useful options, I encourage you to read its man
page so you get an
Am 01.06.2022 um 13:45 teilte Andrey Rahmatullin mit:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:43:12PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Moin,
Do you mean "Build Architecture" instead?
No. Have a look at the links I posted:
I did that before asking.
I'm pretty sure you did! Therefore I'm
Am 01.06.2022 um 13:38 teilte Andrey Rahmatullin mit:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:20:34PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
I had a look at the manual page. The build log (see both links)
makes a difference between "Arch type" and "Build type".
Does it?
Do you mean
Am 01.06.2022 um 13:16 teilte Arnaud Ferraris mit:
Hi,
You can use the "--arch-all --no-arch-any" combination of options
(--no-arch-any being the important part). Generally speaking, sbuild
provides a lot of useful options, I encourage you to read its man page
so you get an idea of what's
Hi,
When using "Build Type: any" for a source package the package build runs
fine, it fails for "Build Type: all". Before upload I tested the build
using "sbuild --no-run-lintian texlive-bin_2022.20220321.62855-3.dsc -d
unstable-amd64-sbuild" and it worked fine.
How do I specify "Build
Am 27.04.2022 um 13:00 teilte Michael Tokarev mit:
Hi Michael,
Many thanks for your E-mail.
As far as I can see, ccache failing like this is because you run
compilation jobs in the install or binary target, not in build
target. These are run as different users.
I don't know if this is
Hi,
Recently I pushed a new version of proftp to salsa. The configured salsa
CI Jobs [1] now fail [2]. The relevant error message is in the job log [3]:
gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLINUX -I.
-I../.. -I../../include -I./../../include -I/usr/include/mariadb/mysql
Am 13.02.2022 um 13:11 teilte Philip Wyett mit:
Hi,
Sorry if my note has confused. Imported into salsa, but still needs
the source only upload as I am not a DM and still need others to
upload. MAybe an appropriate time for me to go for DM?
DM's can have uploads permits for specific packages,
Am 24.01.2022 um 09:43 teilte Andrey Rahmatullin mit:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:14:08AM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi Andrey,
- Can we remove that version 2.13-1 from unstable?
We shouldn't.
And we can't remove it from user machines.
Yes, correct.
- Should I simply upload 2.13-2
Hi all,
yesterday I uploaded dvisvgm_2.13-1 to the archive. For any unknown
reason I deleted the changelog entry for version 2.12-4 from the
d/changelog file, this version is currently in testing. I tried to
cancel the upload using dcut, but this does not work. How to proceed?
- Can we
Am 22.01.2022 um 15:06 teilte Markus Blatt mit:
Hi,
I limit the architecture to only 64bit architectures by having
"Architecture: amd64 arm64 ia64 mips64el ppc64el" in d/control. Yet
this does not seem to respected for autopkgtest as it still tries to
run the test for i386 and armhf.
The
Am 20.01.2022 um 08:49 teilte Alexander Bürger mit:
Hi,
I do not see any solution to this problem:
- rewriting the commit history on gitlab is not an option
Why not? You just have to remove the tag and rewrite the commit message.
Then fix the debian/changelog and try again.
-
Am 19.01.2022 um 21:40 teilte Alexander Bürger mit:
Hi,
Unfortunately, the first attempt to use debhelper in debian/rules failed
to build and I only noticed that after publication on gitlab with
debian/changelog specifying version 0.23-1. The packaging fix did, of
course, not change anything
Am 29.12.2021 um 12:36 teilte Gavin Henry mit:
Hi,
What's this for, when it looks like this was written manually? Google
shows nothing:
https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/blob/debian/main/debian/bind9.postinst#L35
#DEBHELPER#
One of the first google hits:
Am 22.09.2021 um 12:42 teilte Harald Dunkel mit:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor to review the new mg package for Sid,
as it can be found on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mg .
Its not tagged yet.
(I missed the RFS in the subject line, so this is a repost.)
Please refer to the mentors FAQ:
On 6/25/21 3:32 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:01 PM Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for late Reply!
uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?((RC|rc|pre|dev|beta|alpha)\d*)$/$1~$2/,\
...
According to [1] the entry "uversionmangle=..." should handle the case
that there cou
Am 30.08.2021 um 13:22 teilte debian-ment...@jugra.de mit:
Hi,
maybe you can try to copy with
cat <<'EOF' >>debian/$PACKAGENAME.install
program usr/bin
EOF
...and replace the
override_dh_auto_clean:
rm -f program
By a file debian/clean containing the names of the be deleted files.
H.
Hi,
this is the current debian/watch file for proftp, it is not in the
archive yet, just on salsa:
version=4
opts=repack,compression=gz,repacksuffix=+dfsg,dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//,\
uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?((RC|rc|pre|dev|beta|alpha)\d*)$/$1~$2/,\
Am 12.04.2021 um 23:12 teilte Andrey Rahmatullin mit:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:42:47PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
I have a dumb question regarding lintian tag "E: embedded-library". For the
package texworks the lintian tag is reported, even for an build from the
Hi all,
I have a dumb question regarding lintian tag "E: embedded-library". For
the package texworks the lintian tag is reported, even for an build from
the actual vcs.
Unfortunately I have no clue how this lintian error is created. Doing a
"grep -ri pcre" in the build tree does now show
Am 15.03.2021 um 00:16 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Hi,
uscan -ddd tries to download from
https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/releases/download/v/proftpd-v1.3.7a.tar.gz.asc
How to I refer to upstreams new version in pgpsigurlmangle ?
Finally it was more easy that I thought, solution is in [1
Am 15.03.2021 um 08:39 teilte Geert Stappers mit:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:16:24AM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
My attempt to implement signature check is
pgpsigurlmangle=s@archive@releases/download/v$1@;\
s/([^\/]+)\.tar\.gz/proftpd-$1\.tar\.gz/;\
s/$/.asc/ \
uscan -ddd tries
Hi,
this is rather a question regarding handling d/watch in general.
Upstream source is https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/archive/v1.3.7.tar.gz
PGPG sig is
https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/releases/download/v1.3.7/proftpd-1.3.7.tar.gz.asc
My attempt to implement signature check is
Hi,
dumb question. I convert another d/copyright into DEP5 format. The old
file contains:
Upstream author:
Werner Lemberg
With help from:
Per BOTHNER
Noah FRIEDMAN
Kenichi HANDA
Gernot HASSENPFLUG
Wonkoo KIM
Yi-Liang KUO
Hin-Tak LEUNG
Eberhard MATTES
Am 12.02.2021 um 11:01 teilte Andreas Tille mit:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:39:25PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Hi,
You can't adjust anything to get more than 4GB virtual memory on 32-bit
architectures.
You can try adjusting compilation/linking parameters to make the
compiler/linker use
Am 30.01.2021 um 17:28 teilte Mattia Rizzolo mit:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 04:37:23PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
The part of the Debian udd database, which lists new upstream versions [1]
prints that error message, hence there was a scan.
BTW, that's also visible here:
https
Am 30.01.2021 um 04:21 teilte Eriberto Mota mit:
Em sex., 29 de jan. de 2021 às 07:44, Hilmar Preuße escreveu:
Hi,
Unfortunately when looking at the tracker page [1], it tells
"uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version:
In debian/watch no matching files for watch
Am 28.01.2021 um 21:24 teilte Eriberto Mota mit:
Hi Eriberto,
My suggestion is always to use "releases" instead of "tags". Also, you
should use uversionmangle instead of filenamemangle.
version=4
opts=uversionmangle=s/-//g \
https://github.com/TeXworks/manual/releases archive/(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz
Hi,
short question for debian/watch.
Our local version name of upstream tar ball is mmdd.tar.xz. In
upstream the naming is -mm-dd.tar.xz . I've built a watch file,
which correctly finds the new tar ball [1], but the comparison to
version in Debian determines that the version in
Control: merge -1 979990
Am 12.01.2021 um 17:44 teilte Aisha Tammy mit:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
