Re: RFS: chatplus

and linda, they will check the source and the binary packages for you. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: backports.org became really shitty for php5-mysql and mysql-server-5.0

security fixes by releasing whole new versions), but nobody is obligated to do that. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

. in the name since they have had source files or documentation removed because they were non-free. Removing the shipped embedded library does not functionaly change the package, since those components will be substituted by the appropriate library packages in Debian. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

or platform independent? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:17:16PM +0100, olaf wrote: On Saturday 03 March 2007 19:17, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Are those files platform dependent or platform independent? Regards, -Roberto Hi Roberto They are platform independent (at least I think so). *.unf are zip-archives

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

-masters. All of those libraries exist in their own packages on Debian, you need to link against those. Embedding libraries like that has been a great source of headaches to the security team, hence the policy. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

/legends/ . Its still only hosted on http://hosted.filefront.com/0laf , but i ll try to upload it to mentors.debian.net. Umm, having binaries anywhere in /usr/share is a policy violation. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com

Re: REALLY OT: News Flash

, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:17:37AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 19:51 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: I disagree. How do I know that r91 was committed two days ago? This also does not hold for regular, released versions. I don't see why this should be conveyed

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

at which the upstream code was packaged - again, just as a release string is intended to do. I see your point. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: native packages

-- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

the date * the changelog mentions the exact rev No ambiguity. Someone interested in the source would (or should) have the wherewithal to look at the changelog or other documentation if he considers there to be some sort of ambiguity. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http

Re: [OT] svn rollback

:). There is wisdom in what the svn devs did. :-) Other VCS's however, allow rollbacks to occur much more easily ;). Yes, like CVS, which encourages admins to manually edit the repository itself. Argh. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:59:32PM +, Neil Williams wrote: On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:28:10 -0500 Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right. However, I think we are rapidly approaching overkill in this discussion. How about this: * the version string includes the date I

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

. For something that has had stable releases and you are packaging snapshots between releases, I would do something 1.1.15~20070112svn for the upstream version. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:14:50PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: Hi! On 1/22/07, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess it depends. If there has been no stable release with a version number, then something like 20070112svn is what I would use for I would suggest using

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

-- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

or packup a working directory. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

to look at the source control upstream to see when it was committed. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: reasons why downgrades are Not Supported

-styler formats of their own files/whatevers and not newer. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

because I don't like the changelog format you used. Now, if something is a legitimate issue, it should be identified by lintian and/or linda in addition to being mentioned in policy and/or the developer reference. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

that someone forcing their view of what they think is right is justified, unless there is something in policy or the developer reference or lintian/linda to provide justification. Regards, -Roberto Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

. Yes, but enforcing your preferences on someone makes you come off as elitist. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:57:14PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: I would not seriously expect anyone to sponsor a package of mine with an outstanding issue like that. please read the whole mail about his debian/rules and why i prefere to not sponsor

Re: RFS: fspanel -- minimalist panel for X

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:13:11PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: * the homepage entry should have *two* leading spaces. IIRC, this was dsicussed recently and it is basically a matter of preference. I could be wrontg, though. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

that it is not really fair to exclude them. Add to that the fact that the presence of a particular kernel image package in no way guarantees that it is that particular kernel that is running, and you it is plain that it is not necessary to depend on a particular kernel. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

. With a kernel, you boot A and kernel B is no longer running or accessible. You boot B and A is no longer running or accessible. By accessible, I mean for runtime use. This is not true of a library. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

roll my own kernel without using Debian tools (which is a fairly common practice), why should I have to work around your package's dependencies to get it installed? Simply document what is necessary in the way of kernel support and let me sort it out. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

that I had the correct kernel installed, but not running and you would end up with a bug report along the lines of it doesn't work. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:59:30PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:32:21PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: I disagree. I think that while it is not the majority, a sizeable portion of the user base installs a home-rolled kernel. Could you stop that hand

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

if the kernels on those machines are installed by hand? Thus, dpkg won't know about them. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Does a DD become solely responsible for abandonware in Debian?

to disagree with yourself about Debian-related things and you are not likely to do things to make the Debian packaging more difficult than it needs to be. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS toshset

On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:50:16PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: tiCo is working on uploading toshset for me. ^ I don't think so *scnr* I realized that in his last message to me, where he mentioned he would forward it on to his AM. I

RFS toshset

Would someone kindly upload my new toshset package? http://people.connexer.com/~roberto/debian/uploads/toshset_1.72-1.dsc Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS toshset

tiCo is working on uploading toshset for me. Thanks, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Handling bugs

mailing list. It depends. If you feel someone else may erroneously report it, tag it unreproducible, mark it wishlist or something and leave it open. If not, then just close it. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc

Re: Depending on an essential package

and/or the developer reference. Hopefully, you have read both of those. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

to version control. I could, of course, blunder around finding my own method for this, but I imagine it's such a common requirement that there must be good examples to work from. Check out tools like cvs-buildpackage or svn-package, depending on your chosen VCS. -Roberto -- Roberto C

Re: Homepage in debian/control (was: RFS: queuegraph (take two))

. However, if there is a way to tell (by dpkg, apt, aptitude, etc) if a package came from an official repository, then this could work. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Huge private Debian repository...

please? Curently I have over 480 packages to custom applications to maintain... You probably want to setup dak. It is now a package officially in Debian and there is an alioth project where development takes place. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto

Re: RFS: python-musicbrainz2

On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 09:08:35AM +0200, Luká?? Lalinský wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: OK. Two more things and I think your package will be ready. Thanks a lot for looking at it. OK. No problem. I will be sponsoring your package. That is, I am near the end of my own NM process

Re: RFS: python-musicbrainz2

-Indep. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: python-musicbrainz2

On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:14:25AM +0200, Luká?? Lalinský wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: [...] Basically, you should change the mentioned dependencies so that they are Build-Depends instead of Build-Depends-Indep. Thanks, I've changed it to: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.37.2

Re: RFS: Xindy

to sponsor this. I will check it out tomorrow and let you know. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Help with watch file

in the watch file. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Help with watch file

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:08:50PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: Hi! On 8/4/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP directory, with files like ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-1.9g.tar.gz? Add debian

Re: How can a non-DD fix broken packages?

, as they are ones patching and uploading. I'm not sure if that is correct, but that is how I have ssen it work. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: courierpassd

a tool specifically designed to interact with a particular mail server. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: SASL2 (Bug#368370)

, I would really appreciate it. Could you post the URL to the bug? -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: courierpassd

-- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: How to include information about a source package ?

users. So why do you want to include them into a package.? Probably in case someone else wants to grab the source and modify it. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: What is stripping in binary compilations ?

or byte-code-type languages, then you probably don't need to worry too much about what this is. If you work with regular compiled languages (e.g., C and C++) this is definitely required knowledge. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description

Re: How to build packages from tarballs without makefiles

? Where? I was hoping I could make a few changes and run fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage. Dave I would just put those into the debian/rules. There is not enough there to justify a full-blown makefile in my mind. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc

Re: howto pack python programs

). You might even be able to rip off the debian/ directory from my package and modify it to fit your needs. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Requesting upload sponsor

, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Packaging Qemu Launcher, unmaintained but useful software

around to it this summer. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pbuilder and scons

scons on your host machine. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: pbuilder and scons

that the '-' at the beginning of the line caused make to ignore errors from that command. Maybe I have just overlooked it all this time. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: pbuilder and scons

Justin Pryzby wrote: On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:30:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: That is awesome. I have read many docs about make, but never knew that the '-' at the beginning of the line caused make to ignore errors from that command. Maybe I have just overlooked it all this time

Re: Package versioning troubles

/howtos/debcustomize -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpwsABuAWrln.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Package versioning troubles

). So plain apt-get install iptraf will not do anything What is the output of `apt-cache policy iptraf` ? -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpdY1YivMuS1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Depends: awk -- Is that required?

: $ apt-cache show mawk |grep Provides\|Priority Priority: required Provides: awk -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpiLD27iIuP3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Packaging freeloader: problem with python gtk module dependency

this problem? Many thanks in advance for your comments. Cheers Julien If you post the sources for what you have done so far, we might be able to provide more help. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgp15nZj5AyFx.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: More open alternatives to packaging?

through apt? Currently I could only find a homepage containing source packages, not binaries. So does that place exist? (An a homepage collecting apt sources, but that doesn't help) You mean like apt-get.org or dotdeb.org? -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto

Re: managing my packages with svn

that. Only things relevant to the *user* of the package should go there. Things like what build system are used or what additional development tools are user belong in another README that can be put only in the source package but not the binary package. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http

Re: debian/rules: create folder into deb

. Then after the call to dh_installdirs (I think) you can use a simple mv command to move your file to the desired destination. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpVgj2LmreTn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: there was php4-eaccelerator ?

[] Jose Carlos Jose Carlos, Please read the links I provided. That package will not be accepted. The license issues remain unresolved. It will likely have to wait until the program is rewritten. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpWpAjq48Eg4.pgp Description

Re: RFS: istanbul - Desktop session recorder (ITP: #316503)

-- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpr58FGfQRvk.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Procedure for reporting translation errors

bug. If not, you can look up the proper tag and include it manually. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgp05BP5uJsg0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: there was php4-eaccelerator ?

-mentors/2005/05/msg00148.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00130.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00681.html Check the news statements for 2005/07/11: http://eaccelerator.net/HomeUk Probably not a possibility. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http

Re: packages size versus files under dpkg control

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 08:48:08AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: Hello, We are getting quite out of context here but... On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Therein lies the beauty of mathematics. There are an uncountable infinity of files whose sum

Re: packages size versus files under dpkg control

-- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpp3NcB8Ezdv.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: packages size versus files under dpkg control

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:37:27PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:33:20PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:30:30PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote: W. Borgert wrote: Back to your question: I personally hate files that are not under

Re: packages size versus files under dpkg control

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:03:23PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:52:31PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Perhaps we can make use of some the recent research in the area of MD5 collisions :-) Only if you don't mind restricting yourself to files whose md5sum

Re: RFS: Plash: a shell and restricted environment for running programs with minimum authority

/plash_1.11.dsc http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/plash/plash_1.11.tar.gz (The Debian source package contains a copy of glibc 2.3.3, which is 13Mb, but the source for Plash itself is only 200k.) Why? This is a sure-fire way to make sure a package is not accepted. -Roberto -- Roberto C

Re: RFS: Plash: a shell and restricted environment for running programs with minimum authority

On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:47:51PM +0100, Mark Seaborn wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:01:40PM +0100, Mark Seaborn wrote: I'm looking for a sponsor for putting Plash into Debian. The main page is: http://plash.beasts.org and Debian

Re: RFS: secpanel -- A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP

/secpanel sugestions/et al are welcome. It appears that the package is already in Debian, though it has been orphaned. You may want to state that, as I was confused why someone would be requesting a sponsor for a package that already exists. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http

Re: RFS: libopenspc -- library for playing SPC files

are dead! That's not a good indicator of active development :-) -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr pgpD80lLcD0sI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: how use dpatch for binary files ?

care to take a look. http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/06/19/debian/pool/main/r/releaseforge/ -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr pgphGHXl3ZD1c.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Adapting a package for unofficial archive/retrieval via apt-get

/?page=debrepository -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr pgpaZW6bW5EX1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Build-Recommends

advantage of it. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr pgpC95LZOnmIX.pgp Description: PGP signature

Packaging of freenx

there is lots more packaging overhead. All together - Good becuase it is much easier to package. Bad becuase updating one component will require an new upload of all the associated packages andsubsequently require that users all download new binary packages. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http

Re: Packaging of freenx

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 at 10:16 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: I asked a while back (on IRC) about packaging the NX components that are under the GPL. Someone pointed me to Fabian's packages in Skole Linux. Anyhow, those

Re: Sponsoring of packages

with that. If you need something now, you should be prepared to pay for it. If not, you sould be prepared to wait. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr pgp79Sw6KLv2T.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Request for a sponsor for Felix

://felix.sourceforge.net/current/www/licence.html [1] http://zooko.com/license_quick_ref.html -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr pgpLeqg918ed5.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: How do I specify a particular version intelligently?

Quoting Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just had a grave bug filed against my releaseforge package. I have traced the fault to an issue with the version of pyqt-tools. If the package is compiled with the version of pyqt-tools in sarge

How to express dependencies for Java(TM)?

on this? -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: How to express dependencies for Java(TM)?

someone help me out on this? do they *really* depend on a non-free jdk, or will they run with kaffe or sablevm? --elijah Yes. All are heavy Swing/AWT apps. TTBOMK, that makes any free java a non-player. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr signature.asc

Re: How to express dependencies for Java(TM)?

Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:22:19PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: elijah wright wrote: I am trying to package a couple of programs that depend on IBM or Sun JDK (for build) and JRE (for execution). I know that this means the packages will end up in contrib. However, I

Re: How to express dependencies for Java(TM)?

Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:19:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Also, are there any good references on getting Java apps to compile with free Java development tools? (No, I have not yet Googled for this info). Most free runtimes provide directly or indirectly a JDK

Re: No debian/ folder in .deb file

of those files to build the .deb in the first place? -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

How do I specify a particular version intelligently?

-tools from Sid (3.14), it needs the corresponding python-qt3. What is the correct way to specify the depends and build depends? -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Question on placement and naming of binaries

the file with a mv in debian/rules? webc++ is a sh script that provides a simple text-based menu for webcpp. It is also not executable. Same question as above. webcpp is an ELF binary that has correct permissions. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr

Re: Question on placement and naming of binaries

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Greetings mentors, I am packaging webcpp (bug #309723). After having created four other packages, I am beginning to get the hang of this. However, I have come across a situation which I am not sure how to resolve. The install step of the upstream build leaves

Renew RFS for cyrus2courier

Debian Mentors, I would like to renew my request for sponsorship of the cyrus2courier program I recently packaged: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/05/msg00245.html -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Question about next step

the right place to ask. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Question about next step

Richard A. Hecker wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: I am interested in becoming a DD. I have asked for sponsorship for a couple of package I created. chora2, which fulfills an outstanding RFP, was graciously sponsored by Anibal (Thanks, Anibal!). It is now in the NEW queue. My question

Re: Question about next step

it. I live in the Dayton area and would be willing to travel to meet you. A halfway point would be preferred, but I am flexible. -Roberto Adeodato Simó wrote: * Roberto C. Sanchez [Wed, 18 May 2005 18:03:23 -0400]: I guess that at some point I need to do the identy verification step. How does

Re: RFS - cyrus2courier utility to convert mailboxes

Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: A sponsorship for this package would be much appreciated. Package name: cyrus2courier License: BSD (w/ annoying advertising clause) Description: converts Cyrus mailbox format to Maildir

  1   2   >