Hi Stefano,
Stefano Canepa wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.7.15-1
of my package gsoap.
It builds these binary packages:
gsoap - SOAP stub and skeleton compiler for C and C++
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on
Johannes Ring wrote:
...
The package can be found on packages.simula.no:
- URL: http://packages.simula.no/pool/main/s/swiginac/
- Source repository: deb-src http://packages.simula.no/ unstable main
- dget http://packages.simula.no/pool/main/s/swiginac/swiginac_1.5.1-2.dsc
or
-
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2009-09-06, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
- I doubt that many sponsors will be happy DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
on a NEW package.
While I understand that you mentioned this regarding a NEW package, I'm
a slightly bit confused about the best current
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
Cool, the version in unstable is the key.
This is nice, indeed.
$ dpkg-architecture
Hello,
Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
I downloaded lenny and m on a lenny system
the package should be build on unstable. To have lenny underneath is fine, but
then
install a chroot environment that is sid. You should also become familiar with
pbuilder.
now and will use quilt patch
using quilt
Hello,
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 03:27:16PM +0800, Chen Tse Tsai a écrit :
Dear mentors
I am looking for sponsorship for my package 'libsvm'.
It closes the bug #517447. I intend to adopt it since
I am from the group developing libsvm and we are very
willing to help
Hi Peter,
I can go for it unless you have found someone else already.
Cheers,
Steffen
On Friday 05 October 2007 18:45:46 Peter Collingbourne wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.6.0-1
of my package dot2tex.
It builds these binary packages:
dot2tex -
Hi Jan,
I am basically off for the next two weeks but volunteer to sponsor you when I
return at the end of this month - should you not have found someone else.
Please consider to join the Debian-Med folks at
http://www.us.debian.org/devel/debian-med/
there may be someone available earlier than
I could go for it, but since I am very much too busy and a vi user I would
appreciate someone else to jump in. I very much like Prolog, though. Cheers,
Steffen
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 20:51, Philipp Benner wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.14-1
of my
of Debian in
biological labs.
2007/1/29, Steffen Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Dear Moriyoshi and dear Changyan, please get in contact with each other
for an exchange of ideas for the package. Whoever wishes to go forward
with the maintenance should do so. A SVN-based group maintenance
Dear Changyan (also, please correct/apologize if I address you wrongly),
dear Charles,
this is quite a coincidence.
The SBML libraries have two rather ancient ITPs (#24,#277748) of mine and
Andrea Tasso. Just last week I got a patch to my diff.gz. thus bringing it
up to the latest level,
On Thursday 25 January 2007 15:55, Andreas Moll wrote:
Sorry if I missed something obvious, but why not calling it directly
from the sources instead of duplicating it in /debian ?
All right, I will call the script script directly.
And if it is in the upstream source already, then there will
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:52, Jari Aalto wrote:
As to comes to removing # dh_* comments we agree to disagree on
this. I have no problem with
[name omitted]
considering that a good
practice, but I hope that all understad that developers may have
other views that may be equally valid.
On Monday 15 January 2007 07:37, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:14:47AM -0400, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez
a écrit :
Now, I think it's not good to send an email like accusing someone in
here nor discrediting the work of the others. It could be fixed and
discussed in
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
in a program I am packaging, a copy of the source of libtiff, libpng and
libjpeg is included (and was originally linked statically). In the
Debian package, I use the respective Debian libraries, linking
dynamically, and these directories are unused.
Should I delete these
15 matches
Mail list logo
