Hi,
The ImageMagick has stayed in V6 for too long and I tried to compile its V7
myself to see what the problem might be, and indeed I found a big problem
-- I got "Illegal instruction" when I tried to install the built package
elsewhere.
At first it is almost like *"the built packages cannot be
elcome to
> join as an uploader!
>
> I don't see the bug on CC, but please feel free to re add it on your reply
>
> I'll see about reviewing this later today, but I'd prefer to have this be a
> normal maintainer upload :)
>
> Paul
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 6:20 PM T
Thanks Mateusz.
Seeing that your previous NMU 1.3.5-2.1 upload got unnoticed, I'm just
trying to stir up some noise to get you more traction.
CCing Paul who offered me help last time when I attempted it.
Thanks everyone!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 4:46 PM Mateusz Łukasik - mat...@linuxmint.pl
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 12:56 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 4:42 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 4:09 PM Debian Bug Tracking System
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:07:44 +
> &g
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 4:42 PM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 4:09 PM Debian Bug Tracking System
> wrote:
> >
> > Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:07:44 +
> > with message-id
> > and subject line Bug#980990: fixed in golang-github
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 3:21 AM Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> Hi Tong,
>
> On 1/15/22 2:55 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The situation should have been fixed with the new upload of easygen.
> >>
> >> However, the CI build is still failing
Trying again.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 1:16 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:45 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:20 PM Tong Sun
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > > Severity: normal
>
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:45 PM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:20 PM Tong Sun
> wrote:
> >
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I updated my ffcvt to a newer version, and am no
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:20 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I updated my ffcvt to a newer version, and am now looking for a sponsor.
>
> Here is from the d/changelog
>
> ffcvt (1.7.5-1) unstable; ur
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I updated my ffcvt to a newer version, and am now looking for a sponsor.
Here is from the d/changelog
ffcvt (1.7.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version 1.7.5
- add --Speed for speeding up playback (v1.7.5)
-
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 11:50 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:07 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:56:26PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > > right?
> > Right.
>
> > > ...
> > > right?
> > R
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:07 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:56:26PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > right?
> Right.
> > ...
> > right?
> Right.
Thanks, one more thing,
The dbab can upgrade from oldstable (Buster) just fine, but I'm tryin
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:06 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:57:37PM -0500, wrote:
> > > > > > How to do that please?
> > > > > The correct way, it seems, would be to follow the suggestion in the
> > > > > original bug report and fix the "rm -f /etc/dnsmasq.d/dbab.*"
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:07 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:03:10PM -0500, wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:53 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:40:06PM -0500, wrote:
> > > > > > Why
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:53 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:40:06PM -0500, wrote:
> > > > Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a
> > > > warning?
> > > Have you read its description?
> >
> > Please don't overestimate my ability to decrypt
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:41 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:19:44AM -0500, wrote:
> > > > How to do that please?
> > > The correct way, it seems, would be to follow the suggestion in the
> > > original bug report and fix the "rm -f /etc/dnsmasq.d/dbab.*" line in
> > >
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 11:49:32AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a warning?
> Have you read its description?
Please don't overestimate my ability to decrypt
Hi,
Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a warning?
Aren't we supposed to use dpkg-maintscript-helper in maintainer
scripts? At least I was told to do so.
I tried to add `dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile` in my .postrm
file for my dbab package, and now I'm
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 1:05 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:29:58PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > You should remove them manually in postrm, but only on
> > > purge.
> >
> But now you will need to also recover from a bad state
&
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 11:09 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:46 AM Tong Sun wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having problem with my conffile files, see
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995769
> >
> >
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:46 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problem with my conffile files, see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995769
>
> I.e.,
>
>
> grep: /etc/dbab/dbab.list-: No such file or directory
> cat: /etc/dbab/dba
they are not.
Is there any way to have more insights into what's going on during the
package upgrade or conffile files handling?
thx
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:45 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> Hi Mentors,
>
> I need help.
>
> My package cannot be upgraded from current version to latest version
> -- ht
Hi Mentors,
I need help.
My package cannot be upgraded from current version to latest version
-- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995769
It might have something to do with obsoleted conffile files or it
might even not. The problem is, I've been trying to understand how the
Hi,
I can only get half of the conversations from salsa.debian.org in
mail, whereas from github, I can get both other peoples' comments as
well as my replies in mail.
Is that possible with salsa.debian.org? thx
Hi,
I found that origtargz unable to detect upstream new release for me.
--
$ origtargz
Using existing ../dbab_1.5.6.orig.tar.gz
$ origtargz -d
Using existing ../dbab_1.5.6.orig.tar.gz
rm ../dbab_1.5.6.orig.tar.gz
$ origtargz
pristine-tar: successfully generated
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 11:54 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 4:45 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > Ah, indeed. the two files are modified after the package was
> > installed. Actually they are generated, not from within the package.
>
> Configuration files
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:47 PM Paul Wise - p...@debian.org
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 3:31 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > after I remove the package
>
> Did you remove the package or purge it? Removing it will not run the
> postrm, but purging it will.
I use purge.
Hi,
$ head /var/lib/dpkg/info/dbab.postrm
#!/bin/sh
set -e
# Automatically added by dh_installdeb/13.3.1
dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/dbab -- "$@"
dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/dnsmasq.d/dbab-map.adblock.conf --
"$@"
dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:33 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > Can I use rm_conffile to remove a (conffile) directory?
> >
> > I checked the man page but am still not too sure about that.
I am still not too sure about the above yet.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 8:45 AM Sebastiaan Couwenberg -
sebas...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
>
> On 2/22/21 2:23 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
> > However, when I did some research, I found that most packages put
> > rm_conffile in the .maintscript file. Where does that come from? It
> > is
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:33 AM Tong Sun wrote:
> Can I use rm_conffile to remove a (conffile) directory?
>
> I checked the man page but am still not too sure about that.
Moreover, in
The right way to remove an obsolete conffile in a Debian package
https://raphaelhertzog.com/2
Hi,
Can I use rm_conffile to remove a (conffile) directory?
I checked the man page but am still not too sure about that.
thx
Hi,
How to enable the daemon from my package to be started when machine boot?
I used to use SysV & update-rc.d, however,
As per
https://wiki.debian.org/systemd
| systemd is a system and service manager for Linux. It is the default
init system for Debian since Debian Jessie. Systemd is
IIRC, you can upload with the same version # over and over to debian-mentors,
without bumping version #.
The overwriting is done automatically.
Hi,
For I: package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script
N:
N: The package provides daemon, but contains no init.d script Packages
N: that provide services (daemons), like cron daemon or web servers, must
N: provide init.d script for starting that services with sysvinit.
N:
Thanks for helping Paul.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 10:30 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 9:31 PM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > However, sourcing /lib/init/init-d-script will break in some cases,
> > because of which, I had a bug opened against my package.
>
> Pl
Hi,
I have a dilemma,
I have to source /lib/init/init-d-script in my init.d script, **just**
to let the lint warning goes a way, for --
init.d-script-does-not-source-init-functions
However, sourcing /lib/init/init-d-script will break in some cases,
because of which, I had a bug opened against
Hi,
My package version is incorrect. It is currently "1.5.01-1", which I
later learned that it should be "1.5.1-1" instead.
Is it so? and what should I do about it before the freeze? (there
haven't been any upstream functional improvements since then)
Thx
Hi,
(Trying to squash a few bugs before the freeze)
As it says in https://wiki.debian.org/Init --
> Debian packages are not required to provide sysvinit start scripts
But I have a bug opened on my packages, which is packaged for systemd,
that on his sysvinit based Debian, the daemon start/stop
Hi,
Is there anything else I need to do after uploading my upgraded
package to ftp-master?
My following upgraded package has been uploaded to ftp-master a while ago,
Checking signature on .dsc: ../ffcvt_1.6.0-1.dsc: Valid signature from
885FDAB331FED834
Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shc":
* Package name: shc
Version : 4.0.3-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/neurobin/shc/issues
* URL : https://neurobin.org/projects/softwares/unix/shc/
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:52 AM Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:49:33AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:21 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:08:17AM -0500
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:21 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:08:17AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > > I used
> > > >
> > > > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
> > > >
> > > > to fi
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 4:38 AM Andrey Rahmatullin - w...@debian.org
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:28:04PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I used
> >
> > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
> >
> > to fix the hardening is
Hi,
I used
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
to fix the hardening issue, but it yields the following error from blhc:
CPPFLAGS missing (-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2)
See https://salsa.debian.org/debian/shc/-/jobs/1126952
I've tried some "solutions" that I found from the internet but
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:47 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 3:27 PM Tong Sun
> wrote:
> > ... looking further into all those libgit2 related
> > packages that I've already built, I
> > I'm currently helping with the library transition for libgit2-dev.
> Then I would expect you to ask the maintainers for coordination and/or
> help.
The maintainer normally actively participates in the discussion here,
and gives people help, but he is super busy at the moment, so I just
want
Hi,
I'm following
https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Apt_package_caching
to setup new schroot with eatmydata & ccache, but got "chroot cleanup
failed" afterwards.
Here is what I did:
sudo rm -r /srv/chroot/unstable-amd64-sbuild/
sudo rm /etc/schroot/chroot.d/unstable-amd64-sbuild-*
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 2:27 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 01:19:04PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > I'm currently helping with the library transition for libgit2-dev.
> Then I would expect you to ask the maintainers for coordination and/or
> help.
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:05 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:25:19PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > > > > PS, here are all libgit2 related packages installed in my system,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > their vers
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:08 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:58:03AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:50 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 03:27:40PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:50 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 03:27:40PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> [skipped as already answered in private]
Strange, I didn't get anything in private (that's why I'm bumping it),
just searched everywhere again just now and go
Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:33AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > So `libgit2-dev` only shows up once in calligra's debian/control file.
> You need to check actual dependencies of binary packages (e.g. by looking at
> debs with dpkg-deb -f), not your debian/control.
> And libgit2-dev is a d
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:39 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:33AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > So `libgit2-dev` only shows up once in calligra's debian/control file.
> You need to check actual dependencies of binary packages (e.g. by looking at
> debs w
Hi,
How to select only a few packages to build, out of a single source?
The Calligra Suite, calligra-3.2.1+dfsg, builds 46 packages, and it
took over 8 hours to build on my machine.
Now I need to rebuild it, but need to rebuild only one out of the 46
packages --
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:42 AM mentors.debian.net
wrote:
> A comment has been posted to a package you uploaded:
>
> From: Gürkan Myczko
> Package: microsocks
> Url: https://mentors.debian.net/package/microsocks/
>
> ---
> Nice:
>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:59 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:41:58AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:19 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:15:41AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > &
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:19 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:15:41AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > > Also, one dependent of libgit2-dev is librust-libgit2-sys-dev. and I see
> > > >
> > > > $ grep -B10 libgit2-dev debian/contr
Thanks Andrey.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:39 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:33AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > So `libgit2-dev` only shows up once in calligra's debian/control file.
> You need to check actual dependencies of binary packages (e.g. by lo
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:14 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:55:17PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Of all the above 46 newly built binary-only packages, how can I tell
> > which .so from them will link to libgit2-dev, and whether the
> > libgit2-dev
I'm currently helping with the library transition for libgit2-dev.
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libgit2-dev
After hours and hours building, I've just successfully built calligra.
The last few lines of build log are:
-
[ 39%] Building CXX
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 7:32 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
. . .
>
> Found a total of 26 reverse build-depend(s) for libgit2-dev.
Thanks Geert.
One more question, I'm currently helping with the library transition
for libgit2-dev, the above 26 reverse build-depends are all only from
main. Do I also
Hi,
I'm getting "character 0-1: RFC 822 error" from build-rdeps:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
$ build-rdeps libgit2-dev
Reverse Build-depends in main:
--
Fatal error in module common/format822.ml:
character 0-1: RFC 822 error.
No
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:04 AM Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:00 AM Tong Sun
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, let me try.
> >
> > Let me start with 4. Backport security patch for stable and old stable
> > first, as it looks an easier starter
Ok, let me try.
Let me start with 4. Backport security patch for stable and old stable
first, as it looks an easier starter for me.
We can take the further details offline, if you want.
thx
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:08 AM Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 2:29 PM To
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 12:07 AM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the package "microsocks" (#962479).
> It is at:
> https://salsa.debian.org/suntong-guest/microsocks
> https://salsa.debian.org/suntong-guest/microsocks/-/commit
Ah, yeah, thanks for spotting that.
The control file and ITP are correct, just this RFS message has such a problem.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:12 AM Felix Yan - felixonm...@archlinux.org
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2020-06-28 at 00:07 -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Programming Lang: Go
>
&
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the package "microsocks" (#962479).
It is at:
https://salsa.debian.org/suntong-guest/microsocks
https://salsa.debian.org/suntong-guest/microsocks/-/commits/debian/sid
* Package name: microsocks
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author :
* URL
.
Thanks
-- Forwarded message -
From: Debian FTP Masters
Date: Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:33 AM
Subject: dbab_1.5.01-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
To: Tong Sun
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 05:25:48 +
Source
Hi mentors,
I need to dip into the vast knowledge of this group as my question is
not purely Debian packing base (it is a critical step towards it
though).
I'm preparing for my dbab 1.5 release, and I'm testing it in docker.
Then it hits me that releasing it to be docker ready would definitely
Hi,
I've been to
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html
but am still a bit lost on how to provide postupgrade script to my package.
I've made some breaking changes to my package,
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:17 AM Sven Hartge - s...@svenhartge.de
wrote:
>
> Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > --
> > $ ls -l `dpkg -L dbab` > /dev/null
> > ls: cannot access '/usr/share/doc/dbab/README.Debian': No such file or
> > d
Hi,
I've never experience this before and I have no clue either, but not all
files in my package get installed:
--
% apt-get install --reinstall -y dbab
. . .
Get:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 dbab all 1.3.3-1
[22.3 kB]
Fetched 22.3 kB in
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 5:48 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 1:53 PM Robin Gustafsson - ro...@rgson.se
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tong Sun,
> >
> > > I was using `gbp import-orig --sign-tags --uscan` but it seems that
> > > `--uscan` cannot
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 1:53 PM Robin Gustafsson - ro...@rgson.se
wrote:
>
> Hi Tong Sun,
>
> > I was using `gbp import-orig --sign-tags --uscan` but it seems that
> > `--uscan` cannot be used with `gbp import-orig` under the case of no
> > upstream releases.
>
> I
Hi,
How to use `gbp import-orig` to update upstream when upstream has no releases?
I was using `gbp import-orig --sign-tags --uscan` but it seems that
`--uscan` cannot be used with `gbp import-orig` under the case of no
upstream releases.
I'm using the Dep14 Workflow so no pristine tar branch
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 7:56 PM Paul Wise wrote:
> > How to delete my package from ftp.upload.debian.org?
>
> Usually that means using dcut (from devscripts), but in this case the
> package is no longer in the upload queue so you cannot remove it from
> there.
> . . .
Thanks a lot for the
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 7:56 PM Paul Wise wrote:
> >
> > Package has already been uploaded to ftp-master on ftp.upload.debian.org
> > Nothing more to do for dbab_1.3.3-1_source.changes
> >
>
> This error message is solely based on the files on your local system,
> if you want to
Hi,
How to delete my package from ftp.upload.debian.org?
Here are the details -- My upload to ftp.upload.debian.org has been
sitting there for quite some time without showing up in tracker yet.
Later I found out (through kind Thorsten):
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 7:38 PM Mattia Rizzolo - mat...@debian.org wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > How to do gbp import-orig after upstream did *force* push/update with
> > the same tag?
> >
> > While doing packaging, there wil
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 6:28 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How to do gbp import-orig after upstream did *force* push/update with
> the same tag?
>
> While doing packaging, there will always some trivial things I found I
> need to update the upstream source (I'm the
Hi,
How to do gbp import-orig after upstream did *force* push/update with
the same tag?
While doing packaging, there will always some trivial things I found I
need to update the upstream source (I'm the author for both upstream
and Debian packaging).
However, if I have to give a new tag each
Thanks a lot David, for your explanation and detailed commands. I was
trying to find a way out reading the convoluted user manual, and
finally found one way that worked (and much much more convoluted than
the commands you listed and yet achieving much less).
Thanks a lot, I wish I had known them
Oh thanks a lot for trying it out, finding the solution, and giving
comprehensive explanation!
Really appreciate it!
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 5:16 PM The Wanderer - wande...@fastmail.fm wrote:
>
> On 2019-12-28 at 14:47, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible
Hi,
Is it possible to do Debian source search by file name?
I wanted to see examples of overriding
debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature in
debian/source/lintian-overrides files, so I did:
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Fsources%2Flintian-overrides
Pls help. Thanks
-- Forwarded message -
From: Tong Sun
Date: Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 10:06 PM
Subject: RFH: salsa.debian.org/debian/dbab
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I've created/updated the salsa repo at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dbab
All fixed. thx.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:26 AM Tong Sun
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After many readings, I'm still a bit confused about the pristine-tar
> and upstream tarball.
>
> So I've just prepared my salsa repo
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dbab/
>
> and h
Hi,
After many readings, I'm still a bit confused about the pristine-tar
and upstream tarball.
So I've just prepared my salsa repo
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dbab/
and hope everything is good.
My understanding is that with gbp & pristine-tar branch, we can
produce the orig.tar.gz when
Hi, just to be sure,
If I'm updating a package that I maintain. I shall just do it.
I.e., there isn't any BTS (like ITP) to file and to close, right?
thx
Hi,
I accidentally hid a todo list entry in my Ultimate Debian Database.
Now I regret it and want it back again.
How can I do that? Thx
Hi,
I am currently preparing a new version for the 'dbab' packages [0].
I would like to create a packaging repository for it in the Debian
group on Salsa this time [1], but I don't have the necessary
permissions on Salsa to create it myself.
So, could somebody please create it for me and give
close 928099
thanks
Try again...
close bugnumber 928099
thanks
Closing the RFS as I'm not able to get the help/sponsor to finish the job.
"Who serves as a soldier at his own expense?" (1Cor 9:7 NIV)
I helped Debian packaging for almost 10 years and never get paid for
doing so. Instead, I put in my own time and sacrifice my own
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 9:55 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
> I only knew to use this previously:
>
> gbp import-orig --uscan
>
> Today I tried `gbp import-orig --uscan --pristine-tar`, after having
> done the above `gbp import-orig --uscan`
>
> > If so, it might
> > hav
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 6:18 PM Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> What git repository are you running it in? It should be run in the
> packaging repository, not the upstream one. (The package's Vcs-Git
> field currently points to upstream, which is itself a bug.)
Please elaborate what you mean,
Hi,
Debian 10 "buster" was released today.
Just want to confirm that, now when we upload package, we can target
back sid again, right?
thx
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 6:18 PM Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> gbp import-orig --uscan --pristine-tar is the same command as I normally
> use.
>
> Did it fail with something different the first time?
I only knew to use this previously:
gbp import-orig --uscan
Today I tried `gbp import-orig
Hi,
I had been following these two articles for importing a new upstream version
http://marquiz.github.io/git-buildpackage-rpm/gbp.import.html
https://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.new.upstream.html
by doing
gbp import-orig --uscan
But today, I learnt
have
included 928...@bugs.debian.org at the very beginning.
And I'm sorry for not having done that sooner, which might have changed
everything, or might be not. But I'll start doing it now.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:39 AM Mo Zhou - lu...@debian.org
wrote:
> Hi Tong Sun,
>
&g
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:45 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:40 AM Bart Martens wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:26 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:05 AM Tong Sun wrote:
> > > >
&g
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
