On 02/08/2012 02:12 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
Last year I packaged cluebringer (version 2.0 of policyd for doing
greylisting and other anti spam controls) as postfix-cluebringer. In my
initial packaging I used dbconfig-common to handle the
-buildpackage: source version 1.4.18-1~bpo60+1
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Toni Mueller t...@debian.org
dpkg-source -i --before-build roundup-1.4.18
dpkg-source: warning: patches have not been applied, applying them now (use
--no-preparation to override)
dpkg-source: info: applying
Hi Andriy,
On Tue, 31.05.2011 at 14:59:25 +0300, Andriy Senkovych
jolly_ro...@itblog.org.ua wrote:
I'm an uploader of the buildbot and buildbot-slave Debian packages and
a contributor to the buildbot project[1] itself. As you may wonder,
buildbot is a distributed continious integration tool
On Sun, 21.03.2010 at 20:28:32 +0100, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org
wrote:
On a sidenote, you should rather use ip addr show instead of ifconfig.
Why, please?
I gather that ip addr show has much richer output and is easier to
parse, but will this be available on non-Linux platforms, eg.
Hi,
On Mon, 28.09.2009 at 15:50:28 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon
ludovico.cave...@gmail.com wrote:
the latest upstream version (0.8.2) depends on python-iniparse, which
has been in ITP for quite a long time. Version 0.8, instead, has not
such dependency. Moreover I had to repackage 0.8 to make it
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 22:13:26 +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
to directly allow .bz2 files in Debian - we would benefit from smaller
files, too.
Why not use 7z
Hi,
On Tue, 19.09.2006 at 00:16:37 +0200, Frits Daalmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 17 September 2006 23:01, Toni Mueller wrote:
did you try RCS?
man 1 ident
thanks - I think this is what I was after.
To Matthew: I hoped to avoid using strings + something - that was what
I
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a program like 'what' on BSD, but on Linux (obviously).
The following is taken from the man page:
what - show what versions of object modules were used to construct a
file
Sample run:
$ what /bsd
/bsd
$arla: xfs_common-bsd.c,v 1.25 2002/12/18 16:32:03
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
(I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
wasteful version of the same bits on his website just to suit Debian.)
True.
another
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
to directly allow .bz2 files in Debian - we would benefit from smaller
files, too
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:43:03AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
[crap clipped]
Hmm, the debian lists get quite a lot of spam lately. Is there anything
that can be done about this?
(Note: So far I read some 10 answers which gives me a 10-fold
increase in spam and noise over the
Hello,
I'm in the NM queue and would like to (virtually) meet someone who
would lend me a hand. While I did some packages now, I'm still
not really fluent with the Debian packaging system. Also, I
want to tackle a big program where some help could speed things
up... PM welcome.
Thank you!
Hello,
I'm in the NM queue and would like to (virtually) meet someone who
would lend me a hand. While I did some packages now, I'm still
not really fluent with the Debian packaging system. Also, I
want to tackle a big program where some help could speed things
up... PM welcome.
Thank you!
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 01:53:35PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Does the md5 sum of the .orig.tar.gz have to be the same as the one of
the upstream tarball ?
Aren't the orig.tar.gz's packed with gzip -9? If that is the case, the
md5sum would almost always change, since most
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 01:53:35PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Does the md5 sum of the .orig.tar.gz have to be the same as the one of
the upstream tarball ?
Aren't the orig.tar.gz's packed with gzip -9? If that is the case, the
md5sum would almost always change, since most upstream
Hello,
I'm in the process of qualifying for a Debian Maintainer and need
to deliver some working packages. I've done some, but have problems
understanding how the toolchain works (so my Build-Depends and Depends
are out of line). Where do these ${shlibs...} et al get set, and how?
Is there a
Hello,
I've built some Debian packages (and hijacked a few
existing ones to be able to sign these). I'm uncertain
whether I have ironed enough of the problems out of
it to pass. It would be very nice if some of you
knowledgable guysgals could have a look over it
(and please tell me what errors
Hello,
I've built some Debian packages (and hijacked a few
existing ones to be able to sign these). I'm uncertain
whether I have ironed enough of the problems out of
it to pass. It would be very nice if some of you
knowledgable guysgals could have a look over it
(and please tell me what errors I
Hello,
I'm applying for maintainership and am in the process of preparing
a few .deb-s. These are (currently) only Perl modules wrapped for
Debian usage. There is a problem with two of them I don't understand:
1. libimage-size-perl:
Lintian says:
W: libimage-size-perl:
Hello,
I'm applying for maintainership and am in the process of preparing
a few .deb-s. These are (currently) only Perl modules wrapped for
Debian usage. There is a problem with two of them I don't understand:
1. libimage-size-perl:
Lintian says:
W: libimage-size-perl:
20 matches
Mail list logo
