Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton <h...@realh.co.uk>
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton <h...@realh.co.uk>
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Vicent and/or other potential sponsors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton <h...@realh.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Vicent and/or other potential sponsors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL
On 12/08/15 19:39, Tony Houghton wrote:
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
it upstream.
OK, 3.1.4-1 is ready now. The dget command is now:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
it upstream.
Hi,
I got emails saying that roxterm 3.0.1-1 and then 3.0.2-1 were uploaded
and the RFS bugs closed (the latter on 13 July), but the latest version
showing up in the archives is still 2.9.5-1. Has something gone wrong
with the upload?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Section : x11
It builds these binary packages:
roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - binaries
roxterm-data - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal
On 08/07/15 07:09, Vincent Cheng wrote:
NameError: name 'reload' is not defined
debian/rules:48: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_clean' failed
Oh, I didn't notice reload was python 2 only. And setdefaultencoding
doesn't work any more in python 3 anyway.
However, I was able to build
On 07/07/15 09:21, Vincent Cheng wrote:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position
836: ordinal not in range(128)
debian/rules:36: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed
I've attached the full build log.
I think the problem is that the PC you tried the
On 04/07/15 22:29, Vincent Cheng wrote:
(If you have time, please upload an updated package to mentors so it's
easier to discuss any further changes.)
I've done that, hopefully it will be available by the time you read
this. The Breaks/Replaces I've decided on are as follows:
Package:
On 04/07/15 10:19, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
My thinking is that anybody still using roxterm-gtk2 has some good
reason to do so and will not want to upgrade to a GTK3 version even if
it means missing out on the latest features
On 02/07/15 20:49, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Hi Tony,
Sorry, just saw your roxterm RFS and realized that I actually never
got back to you with your latest set of questions.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
That won't cause problems due to the reversed
On 02/07/15 21:09, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I thought I had released 2.9.6-1 and 2.9.7-1 via sponsorship too, but
for some reason the current version in unstable is still
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
On 17/06/15 04:56, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
What I found was that if roxterm-gtk3 is installed, but not roxterm (the old
virtual package), dist-upgrade doesn't install the new roxterm package. I
was expecting the 'Replaces
On 17/06/15 04:56, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
What I found was that if roxterm-gtk3 is installed, but not roxterm (the old
virtual package), dist-upgrade doesn't install the new roxterm package. I
was expecting the 'Replaces
On 15/06/15 08:19, Vincent Cheng wrote:
If these changes are inevitable, it's really up to you as to when you
want to make them happen (I'd suggest that doing them early in the
release cycle is better than later, however). I think these changes
sound fine in principle, although a debdiff would
On 09/06/15 14:04, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 16:54:53 Tony Houghton wrote:
roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it)
roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 (binaries)
roxterm-gtk2-dbg, roxterm-gtk3-dbg (corresponding debugging symbols)
roxterm (virtual
On 10/06/15 12:53, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 17:22:30 Tony Houghton wrote:
Depending on its size, it may be better to keep roxterm-common: this
package is arch:all and this would avoid duplication these data for each
arch.
IIRC I was thinking of doing that a long time ago
On 09/06/15 14:04, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2015 16:54:53 Tony Houghton wrote:
roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it)
roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 (binaries)
roxterm-gtk2-dbg, roxterm-gtk3-dbg (corresponding debugging symbols)
roxterm (virtual
I've decided to discontinue support for legacy libraries in roxterm and
concentrate on GTK3 and vte-2.91 and I want to simplify the packaging
because of this. The current/old version has these binary packages:
roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it)
On 29/11/2014 00:18, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:02 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm. I have also posted an
unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two bugs?
Please add the requested information (i.e. a debdiff
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm. I have also posted
an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two bugs?
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.5-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.4-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.3-1
thanks
On 08/08/14 09:48, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
Except that wasn't working for me, it said it was incompatible with source
format 3.0 (Quilt) (see above). Or was it specifically my regex
On 07/08/14 09:27, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.2-1
thanks
I think I've managed to fix the build now so that the debian package can be
built repeatedly. Most of the changes are upstream so
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.2-1
thanks
I think I've managed to fix the build now so that the debian package can
be built repeatedly. Most of the changes are upstream so there is a new
version. Please use the new link:
On 04/08/14 21:58, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org
wrote:
- Allow the content modification of the po/roxterm.pot
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:
1. Update DH from 7 to 9.
Thanks for the feedback. I'm not quite sure what that bit means though.
Do I just need to update Build-Depends to debhelper (= 9)?
--
To
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:
- Allow the content modification of the po/roxterm.pot. To make it,
create the file debian/source/options with this content[1]:
extend-diff-ignore = ^po/roxterm.pot$
I did
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.1-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http
://roxterm.sourceforge.net
Changes since the last upload:
* Re-enabled deprecated background options for now.
A few people were upset about these options being disabled so I decided
to keep them enabled until a vte without ther support arrives, or is
about to arrive, in Debian.
Regards,
Tony
Thanks for sponsoring it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118142157.427e1...@realh.co.uk
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.8.1-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2
ROXTerm is going to need a new release soon and I'd like to include
debugging symbols. It currently has binary packages roxterm-common (data
files), roxterm-gtk3 (executables linked with GTK3 etc) and roxterm-gtk2
(linked with GTK2 etc). Should debugging symbols always be put in
separate -dbg
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:09:46 -0300
Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br wrote:
Hey! Your package has lintian warnings. Please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
You must add a message about transition from experimental to unstable
in debian/changelog. I suggest: Uploaded to unstable, because
lintian
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:09:46 -0300
Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br wrote:
Hey! Your package has lintian warnings. Please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
You must add a message about transition from experimental to unstable
in debian/changelog. I suggest: Uploaded to unstable, because
lintian
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.7.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
As both the upstream and Debian maintainer for roxterm I'm unsure what
to do about documenting a patch that was submitted by someone else to
the upstream tracker. I've applied the patch upstream but don't know
the best way to credit the author in debian/changelog. Include his
name? Not his email
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:03:50 -0500
Ryan Kavanagh r...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:54:24PM +, Tony Houghton wrote:
As both the upstream and Debian maintainer for roxterm I'm unsure what
to do about documenting a patch that was submitted by someone else
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 14:02:44 -0300
Saulo Moraes sa...@gmx.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to contribute with Debian, I am a professional developer but
will be better to start working as a maintainer. After check the Debian
Packages that Need Lovin' I have choose the samsung-tools as my first
Suppose I have a new version of my package available and I upload it to
experimental during a freeze. After the freeze I'd like that new
version in unstable, but I haven't made any changes in the meantime. Is
there a migration process from experimental to unstable, or is it
normal to bump the
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:27:15 +0100
Nick Andrik nick.and...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that I ran dput yesterday but the package dis not
appear in my packages on mentor (I didn't even receive an email).
I guess it got stuck somewhere in the incoming queue.
I read somewhere that it takes 6
A bug has been found in roxterm:
https://sourceforge.net/p/roxterm/bugs/88/.
I wouldn't consider it a high priority but the fix is very trivial, just
adding a single line of code. Should I release this for wheezy? If so,
how do I go about it? Should I open a debian bug and give it a certain
Pinging this. I guess it may already be too late to avoid some of the
extra work needed to get it into testing after the freeze though :-(.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:59:27 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.5-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
License : GPL2
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 05:42:56 +0200
David Lindelöf linde...@ieee.org wrote:
The source of my project includes symbolic links to other source trees
(notably, the CppUTest framework and a library used by several of our
projects). When I call `dpkg-buildpackage` to build a debian package
out of my
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:19:05 +0200
David Lindelöf linde...@ieee.org wrote:
As a *really temporary* workaround, is there a way I could have the
build system copy over the files to their proper locations, just for
building the package? And then delete them and reinstate the symbolic
links?
Yes,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.4-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.3-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2
/roxterm_2.6.2-1.dsc
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:03:13 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
URL : http
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
URL : http
I can't upload my package (roxterm) to mentors.debian.net. I've set up
my .dput.cf as suggested at
http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers. If I use the HTTP method
I get 403 Forbidden as soon as it tries to upload the .dsc file. The
FTP method has partially succeeded but always times out
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:52:47 +0200
Nicolas Dandrimont nicolas.dandrim...@crans.org wrote:
Le 18/04/2012 à 17:20, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk écrivit :
I can't upload my package (roxterm) to mentors.debian.net.
[Snip]
You can also poke support@m.d.n if the upload still fails (the files
I maintain roxterm. The source package of that name generates a number
of binary packages: roxterm-common, roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 and
roxterm (a virtual package depending on roxterm-gtk3).
A user has reported 2 bugs with slightly different symptoms, one for
roxterm-gtk2 and one for
The latest version of this package is now 2.5.3-1:
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.5.3-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+, LGPL-3+
Section : x11
It builds
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:11:30 +
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.5.2-1
It's been almost 2 weeks since this RFS
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.5.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:42:23 +0100
Tobias Eliasson arnes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/30/2012 12:13 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
The default value for Locale telnet/Perl/SSH executable dialogs
appears to be gnome-terminal. (??!)
It launches a terminal for launching the actual executable. It's not
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:32:46 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Slavko li...@slavino.sk wrote:
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Try
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:58 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org wrote:
Unfortunately there is still one missing build-dep: librsvg2-bin. I
have uploaded 2.4.2-1 with this fixed, please fix it in your
repository as well :)
OK, I've corrected that my end too. Thanks a lot.
--
To
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:12:41 +0100
Tobias Frost t...@frost.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2012, 13:30 + schrieb Tony Houghton:
The debian packaging and upstream are in one repository and I didn't
want the contents of the release tarball to be inconsistent with
what's
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:16:15 +0800
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 01/05/2012 01:33 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza,
so please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.
If that's an issue in the packaging, why
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : x11
It builds
Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza, so
please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.4.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:14 +0100
Dennis van Dok denni...@nikhef.nl wrote:
On 23-11-11 10:27, Joseph Gunn wrote:
A popular way of accomplishing the task is to support
configuration subdirectories
It includes all configuration files in that directory. If you
publish a name that you
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:23:06 +0200
Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
This seems to be a bit excessive. There is no real use in having
many tiny packages for every function; please keep in mind that
this will make the Packages index even larger (which also affects
users that do not
What should you do if you have a dependency which can either use one
package or two (or more) different packages. For example, roxterm's man
pages can be built either with xmltoman, xmlto or xsltproc, but xsltproc
additionally requires docbook-xsl. I don't think control file syntax
supports
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:23:41 +0200
Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
Build-Depends: xsltproc | xmltoman | xmlto, docbook-xsl | xmltoman
| xmlto
This would be a correct rewrite to CNF, but ...
Or would it be better to choose one and stick to that for the sake
of
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:02:04 -0500
Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote:
Perhaps this is offtopic, but there are so many packagers here,
perhaps I can find an answer.
Berlios is closing, I have two small projects, GPLed, that use
subversion and publish tarballs, where should I
I'm a bit confused about the Vcs fields in Control files. Many projects
have the upstream code and debian packaging maintained separately and
I'm not entirely sure what you're supposed to do with the Vcs fields in
that case. Should they point to upstream or the packaging? How can
tools, such as
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:02:04 +0200
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:31:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
You might want to use dh --parallel.
I really wonder why it's not debhelper's default. I understand, it
can break old packages with buggy makefiles, but
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:06:00 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
I agree, but there's another big problem: autoconf. It runs far more
tests than most projects need (especially when using glib which
takes care of a large range
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:40:43 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I think writing build scripts in a language like python is very nice
(autoconf is too slow, let's use python, spot the irony
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 23:37:04 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org wrote:
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm.
Done.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:26:51 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.2.1-1
Hold that, I discovered
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.2.1-1
Hold that, I discovered corruption in the GtkBuilder definitions after
release (looks like vi finger trouble
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+
Section : x11
It builds those
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:08:33 +0200
Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote:
our (not so) old host running http://mentors.debian.net was replaced
right before by shiny new hardware. For you, as user you shouldn't
hopefully notice the switch. The new hardware is much more powerful and
has plenty of
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:28:19 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I think releasing to experimental would be the best option at the
moment, so I'll upload a new version later.
I tried that and my package was rejected by m.d.n:
You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:45:48 +0200
Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote:
No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't
merge our master branch to live (i.e. the deployment branch) yet.
OK. Please post again when you do so I know when I can try again to
upload roxterm.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:44:03 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org, 2011-09-14, 11:29:
That is, more or less, what's happening, so I'll move the bug to
libvte9. In case that takes a long time to fix should I manually
override the dependency?
Yes you
Chen kos...@debian.org wrote:
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk writes:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:54 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org wrote:
You sure you want to upload to unstable, right? Asking because it
was previously uploaded to experimental.
I think so, yes. I didn't really
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:54 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Tony,
You sure you want to upload to unstable, right? Asking because it was
previously uploaded to experimental.
I think so, yes. I didn't really intend to send the previous version to
experimental and wanted to go
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-3+
Section : x11
It builds these binary packages
The last release of roxterm went to experimental instead of unstable.
TBH I forgot that I'd changed it to experimental at some point, but
after release I thought perhaps it's just as well because of the major
changes. However, I think this has resulted in few users noticing the
new version and I
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:12:30 +0200
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
Does roxterm-gtk3 have any functionality -gtk2 doesn't have? Unlike
QT/GTK, there isn't a big difference there and I quite fail to see
the reason to have both. It's a library rather than support for a
whole
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:47:15 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org wrote:
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk writes:
Yes, this is a known bug (#632403) and that's the main reason I'm still
providing a gtk2 package too. As soon as it's uploaded I'll mark the
bug as affecting roxterm-gtk3. I
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen kos...@debian.org wrote:
Only one problem when I tested the package. The gtk3 version, the
terminal window shrinks its width when I try to move it around. I don't
know if it's because of my window manager (awesome) or it also appears
on other
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-3
Section : x11
To access
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:51:11 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:41:33 +0200
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote:
[Snip]
I'd rather keep the name roxterm for the GTK3 version if that's OK.
I don't really want the main package to be named after
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:41:33 +0200
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:39, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
package too, eg to roxterm-gtk3. In the latter case would adding
Replaces: roxterm cause it to automatically replace roxterm at
apt-get
I've split roxterm in to three packages:
roxterm-legacy: binaries compiled and linked with GTK2
roxterm: binaries compiled and linked with GTK3
roxterm-common: All the other files
roxterm-legacy and roxterm Conflict with each other and both depend on
roxterm-common.
I've got 3 lintian warnings:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:30:55 +0300
Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:19:44 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
roxterm-legacy: binaries compiled and linked with GTK2
roxterm: binaries compiled and linked with GTK3
roxterm-common: All the other
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:53:32 +1000
Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:40:34 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I'm pretty sure I once read something about how to get a single
source package to build multiple binary packages from the same
source
A new release of roxterm is in the pipeline. I've made a lot of changes,
mostly to replace libglade with GtkBuilder and to get it to work with
gtk3. I'd ideally like to call it version 2 and have the clear
distinction that version 1 was for gtk2 and version 2 is for gtk3.
However, I suspect a lot
I noticed that RFS's from debexpo don't include a package description.
I'd prefer to see at least the short description without having to
visit the website, and personally I'd like to see the full description
too, at least for new packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
