Bug#1001507: RFS: dwm/6.2-1 [ITA] -- dynamic window manager

❦ 11 December 2021 10:43 GMT, Matteo Bini: >* New maintainer Is there some agreement with the original maintainer? >* New upstream release. You can close #978687 and #945281. -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/debian-package-sponsoring

Re: looking for a sponsor to upgrade mg

❦ 21 September 2021 15:11 +02, Harald Dunkel: > I am looking for a sponsor to review the new mg package for Sid, > as it can be found on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mg . Hello, Can you collapse the two latest changelog entries? 20210314-1 was never uploaded. Did Tomasz confirmed he was

Bug#964980: RFS: ncdu/1.15.1-0.1 [NMU] -- ncurses disk usage viewer

❦ 13 juillet 2020 21:24 +02, Christian Göttsche: > * Package name: ncdu >Version : 1.15.1-0.1 >Upstream Author : Yoran Heling > * URL : https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu/ > * License : expat > * Vcs : None >Section : admin You should

Bug#931960: RFS: jool/4.0.2-1 [ITP] -- IP/ICMP Translators

❦ 12 juillet 2019 18:48 -05, Alberto Leiva Popper : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jool" I have posted a review in #883393 (before seeing this RFS). -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/debian-package-sponsoring signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Bug#928469: Bug #928469: ITP: uacme -- lightweight client for the RFC8555 ACMEv2 protocol

❦ 15 juin 2019 20:39 +02, Nicola Di Lieto : >>Look at https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors. Notably, there is a "Let's >>Encrypt" team (team+letsencrypt@tracker.debian). > > Hello Vincent, > > many thanks for your reply. I already emailed > team+letsencr...@tracker.debian.org at the end of

Re: Bug #928469: ITP: uacme -- lightweight client for the RFC8555 ACMEv2 protocol

❦ 15 juin 2019 07:14 +02, Nicola Di Lieto : > I have tentatively packaged this already in the git repository, using > the DEP-14 branch layout at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14 - look at > the debian/master branch. Not sure what to do now to get it into > debian. Look at

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

❦ 29 décembre 2018 18:33 +00, Dmitry Bogatov : > Probably not. Violations of FHS is violation of policy, and to get > authorization to policy violation is long road, starting with discussion > on debian-devel@. > > But, can't we just configure Nix to store it under /var/nix? This would break

Bug#911867: RFS: frr/6.0.1-1 [ITP]

❦ 27 octobre 2018 14:54 +0200, David Lamparter : > The lib is an integral part of a FRRouting version; the daemons and the > .so must match up. As noted above on the symbols file, the .so version > is not currently used since the ABI is not stable. The "0" does not > convey any useful

Bug#882568: RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

❦ 24 novembre 2017 21:25 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni  : >> Any MBF should be discussed first on debian-devel@ first. For me, >> this seems a small violation and it would be preferable to stick with >> severity normal to not appear too agressive. > > Only 8 source

Bug#882568: RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

❦ 24 novembre 2017 17:48 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni  : >> In d/copyright: you need to include the complete CC0 license. > > OK; I did so based on what other packages were doing, according to > codesearch.d.n [0]. If that's an acceptable solution, I will > - include

Bug#882568: RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

❦ 24 novembre 2017 02:44 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni  : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nq" > > * Package name: nq >Version : 0.2.1-1 >Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen > * URL :

Re: arpwatch & systemd

❦ 22 mars 2017 20:08 +0100, Lukas Schwaighofer  : > I would like advice on the concept itself: Is it ok or should a take a > different approach? Can someone point me to a package that handles a > similar service startup situation differently (better)? It seems a good

Re: Cleaning packaging files with Lintian

❦ 8 février 2017 19:56 +0100, Narcis Garcia  : > I have this error from Lintian output: > E: ntfsundelete-tree: maintainer-address-malformed Narcis Garcia > > > How can I better mask e-mail address in control file? It needs to be machine-readable to let you receive bug

Re: Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons

❦ 29 novembre 2016 23:50 +1100, Scott Leggett  : >> > * Remove /etc/default/quagga. >> >> Should be removed with dpkg-maintscript-helper to alert the user there >> was a change (and its modifications are now ignored). >> > > Actually this file is not in the current quagga

Re: Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons

❦ 22 novembre 2016 23:55 +1100, Scott Leggett  : > This is now ready, here are the changes since your last review: > > * Add automatic migration from -dbg to -dbgsym. > * Add users/groups unconditionally to simplify preinst. > * Create "quagga" metapackage. I would have removed

Re: Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons

❦ 22 novembre 2016 23:55 +1100, Scott Leggett  : >> dh_installinit should install it if you name it quagga-core.default. > > Instead I have just removed /etc/default/quagga from the package because > it wasn't much use anymore. You need to use dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile

Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons

❦ 20 novembre 2016 01:43 +1100, Scott Leggett  : > * Rely on automatic -dbgsym package rather than deprecated -dbg. You need to make a migration for people having a -dbg. This is done with --dbgsym-migration argument of dh_strip. > * Add quagga user to quaggavty group in

Re: New #packaging IRC channel

❦ 3 septembre 2016 03:49 CEST, Paul Wise  : > There have been some folks who aren't satisfied with the level of > signal to noise on the #debian-mentors IRC channel, mainly around > people joining who are not aiming at creating policy compliant packages > for upload to the

Bug#833187: RFS: yuma123/2.8-1 [ITP] -- netconf/YANG toolchain

❦ 20 août 2016 13:27 CEST, Vladimir Vassilev  : > Vincent, > > I just uploaded a new 2.9-1 package - > https://mentors.debian.net/package/yuma123 I don't see any remaining problem. Uploaded. -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines:

Bug#833187: RFS: yuma123/2.8-1 [ITP] -- netconf/YANG toolchain

❦ 8 août 2016 03:00 CEST, Vladimir Vassilev  : >> - d/watch: missing, please add one. It allows you (or me) to >> conveniently know if there is a new version available. This appears >> on various tools like tracker.debian.org or qa.debian.org. > [1] fixed

Bug#833187: RFS: yuma123/2.8-1 [ITP] -- netconf/YANG toolchain

❦ 7 août 2016 16:40 CEST, Vladimir Vassilev  : >>> That is correct they are only initial templates that have been >>> generated by yangdump (mib2c equivalent tool) a long time ago and >>> maintained manually afterwards. Only >>> ./netconf/src/agt/agt_yuma_arp.{c,h} >>>

Bug#833187: RFS: yuma123/2.8-1 [ITP] -- netconf/YANG toolchain

❦ 7 août 2016 15:50 CEST, Vladimir Vassilev  : >>> Some files are generated. They are marked with "Generated by >>> yangdump". This means you'll have to build them during build. If this is >>> already possible in the default build system, just ensure they are >>>

Bug#833187: RFS: yuma123/2.8-1 [ITP] -- netconf/YANG toolchain

❦ 6 août 2016 22:10 CEST, Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> : > Some files are generated. They are marked with "Generated by > yangdump". This means you'll have to build them during build. If this is > already possible in the default build system, just ensure they a

Bug#833187: RFS: yuma123/2.8-1 [ITP] -- netconf/YANG toolchain

control: owner -1 ! ❦ 2 août 2016 00:25 CEST, Vladimir Vassilev  : > libyuma-base - Netconf configuration script, YANG models and documentation > libyuma-dev - Netconf/YANG development files > libyuma2 - Netconf/YANG library > libyuma2-dbg - Netconf/YANG library

Re: mentors site - not trusted

❦ 24 décembre 2015 14:05 +0100, Jakub Wilk  : >> I don't know if it has any bearing or not but, during a recent near >> daily upgrade, I just accidentally happened to actually "see and >> (almost) grasp the significance" that ca-certificates was upgraded >> in the last few

Re: Copyright of composite Makefile.in files

❦ 30 novembre 2015 10:41 +0100, Ferenc Wagner  : > Makefile.in files distributed in an upstream tarball often have several > copyright notices: the FSF copyleft at the top added by Automake and > later those carried over from other macro packages included into > Makefile.am (for

Re: Become Maintainer of an Package when DD/Maintainer can't upload anymore ...

❦ 9 novembre 2015 15:19 +0100, Tim Weippert  : > i'am an Debian Maintainer and would like to take over maintaining an > existing Package within Debian. Problem is, that the current > Maintainer/Developer can't > upload anymore to Debian and so he can't add/change maintainers.

Bug#804283: RFS: igb/5.3.3.2-1 [ITP] -- out of tree Intel Gigabit Ethernet driver.

❦ 6 novembre 2015 22:39 +0100, Clement Hermann  : > The package is on m.d.n : http://mentors.debian.net/package/igb Not available anymore? -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html signature.asc Description: PGP

Bug#804283: RFS: igb/5.3.3.2-1 [ITP] -- out of tree Intel Gigabit Ethernet driver.

❦ 7 novembre 2015 09:23 +0800, Paul Wise  : >> The package is needed because the in-tree driver doesn't have >> advanced features such as interrupt throttle, multiqueue or Large >> Receive Offload. > > Has Intel sent these features for inclusion in Linux mainline? Intel also

Bug#799092: RFS: haxe/1:3.2.0+dfsg-1

❦ 17 septembre 2015 19:17 +0800, Andy Li  : > I've revised the package and reuploaded. In d/rules, get-orig-source is using "curl | python". I am a bit uncomfortable with that. I had a quick look at this Python script and it should be replacable by something like that:

Bug#799092: RFS: haxe/1:3.2.0+dfsg-1

❦ 18 septembre 2015 16:35 +0800, Andy Li  : > I've saved a copy of git-archive-all in debian directory and updated > copyright accordingly. > The package has been reuploaded to mentors. OK, it will be uploaded shortly. -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines:

Bug#799092: RFS: haxe/1:3.2.0+dfsg-1

❦ 16 septembre 2015 03:46 +0800, Andy Li  : > * Package name : haxe > Version : 1:3.2.0+dfsg-1 > Upstream Author : Haxe Foundation > * URL : http://haxe.org/ > * License : GPLv2+, MIT, LGPLv2+ > Section : devel [...] - d/control: in the short

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 14 septembre 2015 11:49 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : > Send for mentor with new changes. OK, this looks good to me. However, your debian/changelog has many English errors and is sometimes difficult to read. I propose to apply the following patch to fix that. If you are OK with

Bug#799092: RFS: haxe/1:3.2.0+dfsg-1

❦ 16 septembre 2015 03:46 +0800, Andy Li  : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haxe". > I'm a member of the Haxe Foundation. I would like to maintain the > package in the long term to improve haxe's debian support. [...[ > * Adopt package. > + Set maintainer to

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 15 septembre 2015 17:10 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : >> > Send for mentor with new changes. >> >> OK, this looks good to me. However, your debian/changelog has many >> English errors and is sometimes difficult to read. I propose to apply >> the following patch to fix that. If you

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 10 septembre 2015 10:41 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : >> Also, the use of 'index.mini-httpd.html' don't allow mini-httpd to find >> it. The index names do not seem configurable. Therefore, you will need >> to patch mini-httpd to also search for index.mini-httpd.html (after >>

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 11 septembre 2015 14:57 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : > Hi, sorry I don't understand you. Which part didn't you understand? -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 11 septembre 2015 08:46 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : >> Sorry for the bikeshed, > I don't understand this. (bikeshed) :) Maybe this is not the proper way to use it. It's like yak shaving. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshedding >> The description of fix-mini-httpd-vhost

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 11 septembre 2015 19:50 +0200, Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> : >>> The description of fix-mini-httpd-vhost could be "Append port number to >>> vhost". The name of the patch could be "append-portno-to-vhost.patch". A >>> bug report numb

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 9 septembre 2015 17:24 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : >> >> > > - Fix error set -e and no install htpasswd (Closes: #520941) >> > So, I understand now, i don't need this mini-httpd.postinstall because fix >> > in patches remove man1 and htppasswd, because apache-utils have

Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 9 septembre 2015 11:23 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : > Changes since the last upload: [...] In d/copyright, you have the same clause for "*" and for "match.c" (and others). In d/mini-httpd.default, I would suggest to remove this "start daemon" variable, unless most users won't

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 9 septembre 2015 15:10 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : >> > > - Fix error set -e and no install htpasswd (Closes: #520941) > So, I understand now, i don't need this mini-httpd.postinstall because fix in > patches remove man1 and htppasswd, because apache-utils have this. >

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 9 septembre 2015 14:59 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : >> > Changes since the last upload: >> [...] >> >> In d/copyright, you have the same clause for "*" and for "match.c" (and >> others). > > I had left "*", but lintian asked to be explicit to the files. > > W: mini-httpd

Re: +dfsg extension with Files-Excluded: in d/copyright

❦ 1 septembre 2015 13:37 +0200, Johannes Schauer  : > I would argue: so is the whole format of debian/watch. It would've been a much > better idea to have this file in deb822 format so that it would be easily > extensible. In that case we could now just add the Files-Excluded

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

❦ 25 août 2015 16:23 +0200, Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com : I'm looking for an uploader for my new package of American Fuzzy Lop (afl), which is on ITA [1]. Hi Daniel! I don't see any obvious problem. Did you already contact Jakub about this RFS? It's always easier for the

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

❦ 25 août 2015 17:05 +0200, Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com : I don't see any obvious problem. Did you already contact Jakub about this RFS? It's always easier for the previous maintainer to check a new upload. I would also suggest to move the package to a more modern packaging by

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

❦ 25 août 2015 14:46 GMT, Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it : 1) please don't set architectures fields that way. Either choose !arm64 (it should work) or (in my opinion the best way) leave any. When llvm will transition (and it should transition as soon as gcc is sorted

Re: how to use pbuilder without .dsc files?

❦ 24 août 2015 11:25 -0700, Shawn Sörbom sh...@sorbom.com : Thank you everybody, I appreciate it. I noticed that in my case, the pdebuild solution didn't work until I installed the pkg-kde-tools on my host system (it is a dependency in my case). I guess that tool is used during source

Bug#795298: #795298 RFS: roxterm/3.1.3-1

❦ 12 août 2015 20:16 +0100, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk : Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change it upstream. OK, 3.1.4-1 is ready now. The dget command is now: dget -x

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

❦ 5 août 2015 10:28 GMT, Fabrice Aeschbacher fabrice.aeschbac...@gmail.com : I wanted to ask for an inclusion in debian, but the policy says even if I'm upstream myself, I'm not supposed to have a debian/ directory at all. There is no such policy.

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

❦ 5 août 2015 13:50 +0200, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org : https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What.27s_wrong_with_upstream_shipping_a_debian.2F_directory.3F The arguments all rely on .diff.gz which is not used anymore with 3.0 formats. I think the whole entry should be removed as there is

Re: next step in contributing to Debian

❦ 31 juillet 2015 18:42 -0400, Nicholas Steeves nstee...@gmail.com : https://readme.phys.ethz.ch/documentation/debian_version_numbers/ So for xserver-xorg-video-savage_2.3.8-1, backported to jessie, the version would be: xserver-xorg-video-savage_2.3.8-1.1~bpo8+1 rather than

Re: How or if daemon users should be removed

❦ 1 juillet 2015 12:52 +0200, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org : So, should I: * Not remove the user on purge (as I have seen done in other packages) There seem to be consensus that system users should not be removed. Please see bug #621833 for details. The thread is mostly dead and it seems

Re: How or if daemon users should be removed

❦ 30 juin 2015 14:07 -0700, Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com : I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its daemon with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are not guaranteed

Bug#780032: RFS: deheader/1.1-1 [ITP]

❦ 8 mars 2015 15:43 +0100, Reiner Herrmann rei...@reiner-h.de : I am looking for a sponsor for my package deheader [...] Uploaded. Thanks! -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#776066: RFS: python-click/3.3-2 [closes #772605]

❦ 23 janvier 2015 09:25 -0500, Alexandre Viau alexan...@alexandreviau.net : I have a fix for #772605 and I am looking for a sponsor. The release is already tagged on the collab-maint repo (see below), my current sponsor seems busy and does not answer my emails.

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

❦ 17 janvier 2015 22:51 +0100, Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr : OK, I don't mind. We'll see what FTP masters will say about that. The package is ready to upload, should I? I believe so :). Done! -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines:

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

❦ 12 janvier 2015 16:59 +0100, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org : I have not tested the result, but the package looks good otherwise. I've just reuploaded the package to mentors. It should be visible in few minutes. I'll try the package later. I am fine with the package as is. What do you

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

❦ 17 janvier 2015 22:17 +0100, Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr : I am fine with the package as is. What do you think about what I said about debian/copyright and the MIT/Expat license? my only concern is that the text of the license is not literally the MIT/Expat license so I would

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

❦ 12 janvier 2015 14:30 +0100, Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr : It builds those binary packages: mininet - process-based network emulator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mininet

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

❦ 12 janvier 2015 15:43 +0100, Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr : - in d/copyright, you license debian/* under GPL-2+ but since the original software is licensed as MIT, it would be better to use the same license. This allows upstream to integrate your changes more easily.

Re: How to let different programs use same man page

❦ 14 décembre 2014 04:15 GMT, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com : What's the trick to have different programs use same man page when packaging a Debian package? E.g., say I'm packaging gzip, and I want both `man gzip` and `man gunzip` goes to the same man file. How can I make it happen?

Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice

❦ 30 novembre 2014 14:06 GMT, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com : I'm currently hosting my self-maintained Debian packages on GitHub. Here is my dilemma: - It is commonly recommended not to put the `debian` folder within the source tree so as to make it easier for other distros. In the

Bug#768251: RFS: ip2location/7.0.0-1 [ITP]

❦ 6 novembre 2014 13:30 +0100, Tobias Frost t...@frost.de : Looks like there is a lite version available here: http://lite.ip2location.com/ ... but with a non-free license, only, IMHO --- from http://lite.ip2location.com/faqs --- Can I redistribute the database in my client application?

Bug#768251: RFS: ip2location/7.0.0-1 [ITP]

❦ 6 novembre 2014 16:57 +0100, Tobias Frost t...@frost.de : So, under WHAT License is that thing now? I don't know... I suppose it has been changed to CC-BY-SA recently and they didn't update the content of the archive (or the script generating the archive). All other lite databases are not

Bug#757675: RFS: python-djvulibre/0.3.9-2 -- Python support for the DjVu image container format

❦ 10 août 2014 12:59 +0200, Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com : I'm looking for a sponsor for my new package of python-djvulibre, which now also builds Python3 packages. It appears to be Lintian clean. Hi Daniel! Not much to say. Are you sure that upstream-signing-key.pgp is at the

Bug#757675: RFS: python-djvulibre/0.3.9-2 -- Python support for the DjVu image container format

❦ 10 août 2014 16:10 +0200, Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com : Also, you may want to remove debian/patches when it is empty. Removed. OK, uploaded. -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html signature.asc Description: PGP

Bug#755855: RFS: liblaxjson/1.0.2-1 [ITP] -- relaxed JSON streaming parser C library

❦ 23 juillet 2014 15:41 -0700, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com : Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package liblaxjson: * Package name : liblaxjson Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com *

Bug#755855: RFS: liblaxjson/1.0.2-1 [ITP] -- relaxed JSON streaming parser C library

❦ 24 juillet 2014 00:10 -0700, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com : Thanks again. If you want to have another look, I have uploaded 1.0.2-2: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libl/liblaxjson/liblaxjson_1. 0.2-2.dsc Seems fine. Please, reupload as 1.0.2-1 (just remove any changelog

Re: Please help translate old rules file on the installation rules

❦ 12 juillet 2014 03:51 GMT, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com : # main packaging script based on dh7 syntax %: dh $@ override_dh_auto_install: install -m 755 ddclient \ $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/ddclient install -D -m 755 debian/ddclient.NetworkManager \

Re: where are these lintian problems coming from

❦ 12 juillet 2014 05:19 GMT, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com : Do I need to care about the lintian problems from the binary package that I maintain/build? Yes, you need to handle at least errors and warnings. For the following problems, I have no idea where they come from: N: Processing

Bug#740043: Powerline dans Debian

❦ 9 mai 2014 20:09 -0400, Jerome Charaoui jer...@riseup.net : Il y a quelques semaines, j'ai soumis une permière version du paquet sur mentors.debian.net, voir mon RFS à https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740043 Hi! The suggestion for powerline package should not pull vim,

Bug#740043: Powerline dans Debian

❦ 10 mai 2014 11:23 -0400, Jerome Charaoui jer...@riseup.net : Thank you for this useful review! An updated package has been pushed to mentors. Seems fine, just uploaded. -- Use data arrays to avoid repetitive control sequences. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

❦ 24 décembre 2013 00:15 CET, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com : That's currently the case, but probably won't be for long. The next version (which is nearly ready) is written in OCaml rather than Python. At that point, I'll probably separate the GTK plugin from the main binary. It wuld be

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

❦ 23 décembre 2013 15:22 CET, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com : You are renaming the source package. Is it really necessary? This is possible, but it is a bit painful to manage. With a new source package, you need to issue a -1 version. This means to add an epoch to let your transitional

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

❦ 22 décembre 2013 12:10 CET, Thomas Leonard tal...@gmail.com : ITP stands for Intend to package. These are packages which not exist in Debian yet. Such packages need to go through NEW. That is the queue on ftp-master for packages uploaded for the first time, which need to be reviewed first.

Re: Packaging C-Library

❦ 8 décembre 2013 16:34 CET, Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de : * The package is a small package. Should it, as it provides a shared lib, be broken up into to seperate packages? Should it be libcmime-dev or just libcmime. Currently it's named just libcmime. Yes, libcmime-dev will

Re: Packaging C-Library

❦ 8 décembre 2013 18:08 CET, Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de : * The package is a small package. Should it, as it provides a shared lib, be broken up into to seperate packages? Should it be libcmime-dev or just libcmime. Currently it's named just libcmime. Yes, libcmime-dev will

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

❦ 16 novembre 2013 01:27 CET, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br : Thanks a lot for your revision and assistance. I think that was a confusion between n and space keys when reorganizing the Depends field. Sorry for that. I already fixed the problem and I put the new package in Mentors:

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

❦ 16 novembre 2013 11:50 CET, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org : Thanks a lot for your revision and assistance. I think that was a confusion between n and space keys when reorganizing the Depends field. Sorry for that. I already fixed the problem and I put the new package in Mentors

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

❦ 16 novembre 2013 12:14 CET, Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de : to the maintainer and any sponsor: ** Please do a very, very careful license review! ** We had a very long discussion about this software at debianforum.de [0][1][2] because the upstream author wanted us to test the

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

❦ 16 novembre 2013 12:56 CET, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br : Well, ffmpeg was dropped by Debian and the replace is libav (#729147). Vokoscreen supports avconv since 18.0 version. Thus, I used libav-tools (avconv) as install dependency and tested it. Worked fine. However, we may have a

Bug#729601: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast creator

❦ 14 novembre 2013 21:33 CET, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br : I am looking for a sponsor for my package vokoscreen. I am a DM and I need the first upload only. * Package name: vokoscreen Version : 1.8.1-1 Upstream Author : Volker Kohaupt * URL :

Re: New upstream source tarball introduces a new shared library

❦ 13 novembre 2013 09:04 CET, Tom Lee deb...@tomlee.co : Yes it is -- all the libraries built by the source package have the same version numbers. It wasn't too much trouble to split out libkj, so I did that. I can either leave it that way or fold it back into the libcapnp binary package.

Re: New upstream source tarball introduces a new shared library

❦ 13 novembre 2013 09:21 CET, Tom Lee deb...@tomlee.co : Can I assume you're interested in sponsoring capnproto_0.3.0-1 Vincent, or should I open an RFS? Yes, mail me directly so I don't forget. -- Program defensively. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger)

Re: New upstream source tarball introduces a new shared library

❦ 13 novembre 2013 05:30 CET, Tom Lee deb...@tomlee.co : I work on the packaging for capnproto. Upstream has provided a new source tarball that introduces a new shared library (libkj). Theoretically, this shared library is stand-alone could be used independently, but it is likely only

Bug#729374: RFS: spiped/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- create secure pipes between socket addresses

❦ 12 novembre 2013 15:12 CET, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net : I am looking for a sponsor for my new package spiped. This is the first version uploaded to the Debian archive; the corresponding ITP bug is #699310. * Package name: spiped Version : 1.3.1 Upstream Author :

Bug#729208: RFS: pasystray/0.4.0-1 [ITP]

❦ 10 novembre 2013 09:15 CET, Scott Leggett sc...@sl.id.au : I am looking for a sponsor for my package pasystray Package name: pasystray Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Christoph Gysin christoph.gy...@gmail.com URL :

Bug#728587: RFS: compton/0.1~beta2-1

❦ 3 novembre 2013 12:50 CET, Scott Leggett sc...@sl.id.au : I am looking for a sponsor for my package compton Package name: compton Version : 0.1~beta2-1 Upstream Author : Richard Grenville pyx...@gmail.com URL : https://github.com/chjj/compton License

Re: permission to write to /usr/local/share/packagename

❦ 4 octobre 2013 22:56 CEST, Beco r...@beco.cc : What I'm not getting is that I have no write permissions to this directory where the data will be. Apps that run with user rights usually store their data in that user's home directory. Do you really need to write the data into the global

Bug#724333: RFS: swftools/0.9.2+git20130725-1

❦ 23 septembre 2013 21:44 CEST, Christian Welzel gaw...@camlann.de : I am looking for a sponsor for my package swftools * Package name: swftools Version : 0.9.2+git20130725-1 * URL : http://www.swftools.org/ * License : GPL Section : utils

Bug#722919: RFS: windowlab/1.40-2

❦ 14 septembre 2013 16:43 CEST, Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se : I am looking for a sponsor for my package windowlab Package name: windowlab Version : 1.40-2 Upstream Author : Nick Gravgaard m...@nickgravgaard.com URL :

Bug#722094: RFS: avra/1.3.0-1 [ITA] -- assembler for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

❦ 10 septembre 2013 06:04 CEST, Milan Kupcevic mi...@physics.harvard.edu : Please, convert debian/copyright to DEP-5. This is not a mandatory step for Debian policy but this is something that I require to sponsor packages. Done. Usually, we ignore autoconf stuff like configure,

Bug#722094: RFS: avra/1.3.0-1 [ITA]

❦ 7 septembre 2013 22:22 CEST, Milan Kupcevic mi...@physics.harvard.edu : I am looking for a sponsor for my package avra Package name: avra Version : 1.3.0-1 URL : http://avra.sf.net License : GPL-2+ Section : electronics It builds this

Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

❦ 4 septembre 2013 17:22 CEST, Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.com : I'm seeing the FTP Master NEW queue, and it seems that you have uploaded a wrong version with the wrong build-dependencies. Can you re-upload with the newest version in Mentors? I don't see a difference in the build

Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

❦ 3 septembre 2013 11:17 CEST, Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.com : I have re-uploaded the package with the simplified debian/rules. Please review. Looks great. I have uploaded it. -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html

Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

❦ 2 septembre 2013 13:53 CEST, Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.com : I have re-uploaded my package to Debian Mentors. I am unsure if the symbols file will work with other architectures. But we'll see when the package will be built for other architectures. I think you are thinking too much for

Bug#721152: RFS: libsass/1.0-1 [ITP] -- C implementation of a sass compiler

❦ 28 août 2013 16:34 CEST, Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.com : Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libsass * Package name: libsass Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Hampton Catlin supp...@moovweb.com * URL :

Re: RFS: b43-fwcutter/1:018-1 (Second Try)

❦ 23 août 2013 15:13 CEST, Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com : Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package b43-fwcutter * Package name: b43-fwcutter * Version : 1:018-1 * Upstream Author : Martin Langer martin-lan...@gmx.de * URL :

Bug#720063: RFS: capnproto/0.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Tool for working with the Cap'n Proto data interchange format

❦ 21 août 2013 09:02 CEST, Tom Lee deb...@tomlee.co : Changelog squashed. CCing Kenton RE: the SONAME suggestion. I suspect that because capnproto is relatively young the frequent SONAME breakages might be warranted -- I'm happy to work with that for now so long as it's not in breach of

  1   2   3   4   5   >