RFS: cynthiune.app (updated package)

2010-05-18 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.5-10 of my package "cynthiune.app". It builds these binary packages: cynthiune.app - Music player for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 581924, 581925 The package can be found on me

RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2010-05-14 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.20.0-1 of my package "gnustep-base". It builds these binary packages: gnustep-base-common - GNUstep Base library - common files gnustep-base-doc - Documentation for the GNUstep Base Library gnustep-base-examples - Examples using the G

Re: RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2010-05-13 Thread Yavor Doganov
Luca Falavigna wrote: > > http://fsa-bg.org/~yavorescu/gnustep/GSXML-catalogs.patch > > Tested, and it seems working very good: Good to know; thanks. > I'm going to upload it to process the merge, if you can commit it in > VCS, next upload in Debian will be straight synced in Ubuntu. I'm not su

Re: RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2010-05-13 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 13 May 2010 09:06:15 +0200, Luca Falavigna написа: > Il 13/05/2010 6.27, Yavor Doganov ha scritto: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnustep-dev/2010-02/msg00035.html >> >> I'll test it and if it works, will ask upstream to comment/consider the >> patch f

Re: RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2010-05-12 Thread Yavor Doganov
Luca Falavigna wrote: > Uploaded. Thanks! Unfortunately it failed to build almost everywhere, because gnustep-make's dependency on gnustep-common is too loose. I'll request give-backs once -make is installed on all archs, and will fix this with the next upload. > Also, could you please consider

RFS: gnustep-make (updated package, RC bug fixes)

2010-05-12 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4.0-1 of my package "gnustep-make". It builds these binary packages: gnustep-common - Common files for the core GNUstep environment gnustep-make - Basic GNUstep Makefiles gnustep-make-doc - Documentation for GNUstep-make The upload w

RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2010-05-10 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.19.3-3 of my package "gnustep-base". This upload should fix FTBFS on powerpc and hurd-i386. There seems to be some problem with mentors.d.n so dget-able source is available here: http://fsa-bg.org/~yavorescu/gnustep/gnustep-base_1.19

Re: RFS: gnustep-base (updated package, security bug)

2010-05-09 Thread Yavor Doganov
At Thu, 06 May 2010 11:16:27 +0300, Явор Доганов wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.19.3-2 > of my package "gnustep-base". > The most important thing in this upload is a fix for a nasty security > issue in gdomap, discovered yesterday. I've discussed the case with > the Sec

RFS: gnustep-base (updated package, security bug)

2010-05-06 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.19.3-2 of my package "gnustep-base". It builds these binary packages: gnustep-base-common - GNUstep Base library - common files gnustep-base-doc - Documentation for the GNUstep Base Library gnustep-base-examples - Examples using the G

Re: RFS: Various GNUstep packages; looking for a general sponsor

2010-05-03 Thread Yavor Doganov
Luca Falavigna wrote: > Yavor Doganov ha scritto: > > I kindly ask anyone who is interested to consider sponsoring the > > below packages, > My direct knowledge of the whole GNUstep stack is very limited, > though, so I could not be able to directly contribute to the team

RFS: agenda.app (updated package)

2010-03-21 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41-1 of my package "agenda.app". It builds these binary packages: agenda.app - Calendar manager for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/de

RFS: mpc123 (updated package; NMU)

2010-02-24 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU version 0.2.4-1.1 of the package "mpc123". It builds these binary packages: mpc123 - Command-line Musepack audio player The upload would fix these bugs: 552829 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.ne

Dependency on oss-compat for (old) apps using /dev/dsp?

2010-01-26 Thread Yavor Doganov
Is it a RC bug if a package using /dev/dsp on GNU/Linux does not explicitly depend on oss-compat? I remember a recent release goal proposal about dropping/fixing apps that still do that, but I can't find it at the official release-goals list (anyway, even if it was approved, release goal related b

Re: original package changelogs

2010-01-10 Thread Yavor Doganov
ngelog of the `log' command, but it has the major disadvantage of duplicating entries when two subsequent unrelated changes are made by a single person, i.e. it generates 2010-01-10 Yavor Doganov Fix memory leak in foo. * src/foo.c (frobnicate): Free `bar'.

RFS: meta-gnustep (updated package)

2010-01-10 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.4 of my package "meta-gnustep". It builds these binary packages: gnustep- The GNUstep Development Environment -- user applications gnustep-core-devel - The GNUstep Development Environment -- core development gnustep-core-doc - The

RFS: systempreferences.app

2009-12-28 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "systempreferences.app". * Package name: systempreferences.app Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Enrico Sersale Riccardo Mottola Ingolf Jandt * URL : http://gnustep.org

Re: RFS: libmusicbrainz-2.1 (QA upload)

2009-12-17 Thread Yavor Doganov
Christoph Egger wrote: > OK it took me some more time, however your package seems to FTBFS > on the GNU/Hurd porter box still I reuploaded a fixed package. The problem was that patches were applied after the configure run. Embarrassing situation... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men

Re: RFS: libmusicbrainz-2.1 (QA upload)

2009-12-17 Thread Yavor Doganov
Christoph Egger wrote: > Hm ok I guess I personally would prefer a the see some notice if > there are some tags > pedantic If this is a generally desirable thing among sponsors, we'll of course comply. (Some info tags are only a matter of style, though.) > OK it took me some more ti

Re: RFS: libmusicbrainz-2.1 (QA upload)

2009-12-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
Christoph Egger wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > The package appears to be lintian clean. That's right; it is lintian clean in my book. AFAIK mentors.d.n uses the same heuristic ("lintian clean" == no errors and warnings). M

Re: RFS: libmusicbrainz-2.1 (QA upload)

2009-12-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
Christoph Egger wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > The package appears to be lintian clean. That's right; it is lintian clean in my book. AFAIK mentors.d.n uses the same heuristic ("lintian clean" == no errors and warnings). M

RFS: Various GNUstep packages; looking for a general sponsor

2009-12-14 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, Much to our regret the maintainer of the core GNUstep libraries has resigned recently [1]. Hubert (uhoreg) has been instrumental for the survival of this not-universally-loved technology in Debian, and has been keeping up with the good work for a few years. As it happens sometimes,

RFS: libmusicbrainz-2.1 (QA upload)

2009-12-14 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.5-3 of the oprhaned package "libmusicbrainz-2.1". It builds these binary packages: libmusicbrainz4-dev - Second generation incarnation of the CD Index - development libmusicbrainz4c2a - Second generation incarnation of the CD Index

Re: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n work not as expected

2009-12-07 Thread Yavor Doganov
Erik Schanze wrote: > If I use any other name than "MAKEFLAGS" for the variable, it works > as expected. There is the key? Yes, there's your bug. MAKEFLAGS is an internal make variable which is passed automatically to all sub-make invocations (of course they *must* be invoked with $(MAKE)). Do n

Re: RFS: avifile (QA upload)

2009-11-23 Thread Yavor Doganov
At Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:26:39 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: > I'm a little leary of a couple of the lintian over-rides but I have > uploaded your changes. Thanks (again), Barry. FWIW, I can't understand the rationale for | avifile-utils: setuid-binary usr/bin/kv4lsetup 4755 root/root but this ove

RFS: avifile (QA upload)

2009-11-19 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-2 of the orphaned package "avifile". It builds these binary packages: avifile-divx-plugin - Divx4Linux video de/encoding plugin for libavifile avifile-mad-plugin - MAD - MPEG audio plugin for l

Re: RFS: avifile (QA upload)

2009-11-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
Barry deFreese wrote: > Uploaded thanks. Thank you. > Probably should remove the empty dirs but that's not a serious > issue. I hesitated, because it seems to me the package will fail to build when the woe32 plugins are to be built. (I haven't tried, though.) > Also, your changelog is a bit w

Re: RFS: avifile (QA upload)

2009-11-03 Thread Yavor Doganov
At Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:06:53 +0300, Явор Доганов wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-1 > of the orphaned package "avifile". > The upload would fix these bugs: 206467, 227408, 290069, 435169, > 448736, 473414, 489012, 492040, 526536, 538750, 538753, 542527.

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

2009-10-26 Thread Yavor Doganov
Георги Данчев wrote: > > This will lead to FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, where PATH_MAX is undefined. > I think that using a hardcoded value of 1024 would be fine, Well, I haven't looked at the source, but it seems to me that #ifdef'ing your code block would be OK. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

2009-10-26 Thread Yavor Doganov
Георги Данчев wrote: > +if ( strlen(argv[optind++]) > PATH_MAX ) { This will lead to FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, where PATH_MAX is undefined. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: cynthiune.app (updated package)

2009-10-23 Thread Yavor Doganov
Явор Доганов wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.5-8 of my package > "cynthiune.app". Forgot to add: Programming Lang: Objective-C, C, C++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis

RFS: cynthiune.app (updated package)

2009-10-23 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.5-8 of my package "cynthiune.app". This upload is primarily targeted for the libmpcdec6 transition, but I take the opportunity to fix some other issues as well. It builds these binary packages: cynthiune.app - A free software and r

RFS: avifile (QA upload)

2009-10-23 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-1 of the orphaned package "avifile". Programming Lang: C++, C It builds these binary packages: avifile-divx-plugin - Divx4Linux video de/encoding plugin for libavifile avifile-mad-plugin - MAD

Re: RFS: libmpcdec (updated package)

2009-09-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:23:41 +, Antonio Radici написа: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:20:04PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: >> The plan for this package is to die ASAP, to be replaced by the new >> libmpc package. > > I know, but until the transition is not done completely we

Re: Subject: RFS: libgnupdf (updated package)

2009-09-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
As someone watching GNU PDF upstream, I've always wondered why this package is in Debian *now*. The library is far from complete, and nothing uses it (naturally). The only insignificant benefit is to test the code on the autobuilders, which is not a good enough reason in my book. At least i

Re: RFS: libmpcdec (updated package)

2009-09-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:46:15 +, Antonio Radici wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.2.2-3 > of my package "libmpcdec". The plan for this package is to die ASAP, to be replaced by the new libmpc package. I see no point in adopting it, better help with the libmpcdec6 tran

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:36:11 -0400, Leinier Cruz Salfran написа: > libsockets (2.3.6-2) unstable; urgency=low > * Added debugging symbols package > lintian's authors do not recommend running it with root privileges! Indeed, so why do you do that? ;-) > I: libsockets2: no-symbols-control-file

Re: RFS: opendchub (updated package)

2009-08-27 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:52:43 +0300, George Danchev написа: > But those diffs are applied in a combined fashion to the upstream source > (not very helpful for people actually interested to understand the > code), while they might be extremely interested to understand how many > *logical* changes hav

RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2009-08-16 Thread Yavor Doganov
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.19.1-1 of my package "gnustep-base". Programming Lang: Objective-C It builds these binary packages: gnustep-base-common - GNUstep Base library - common files gnustep-base-doc - Documentation for the GNUstep Base Library gnustep-base-examples - Exam

RFS: gnustep-make (updated package)

2009-08-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.0-1 of my package "gnustep-make". Programing Lang: Make, sh It builds these binary packages: gnustep-common - Common files for the core GNUstep environment gnustep-make - Basic GNUstep Makefiles gnustep-make-doc - Documentation for

Re: change glib-config to pkgconfig in configure.in

2009-05-19 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Fri, 15 May 2009 14:10:40 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI написа: > There is an easier way, you can use the PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro: Even easier: use AM_PATH_GLIB_2_0. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on.... (they use none of its symbols)

2009-03-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:09:39 +, Yavor Doganov написа: > (which is my understanding of the biggining of your example ^ Ugh. I certainly meant "beginning"; sorry. One more thing. IMHO --as-needed is potentially dangerous when it's

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on.... (they use none of its symbols)

2009-03-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:36:51 +0100, Bernhard R. Link написа: >> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00413.html > > |(elf_link_add_object_symbols): Link in --as-needed libs if they | > satisfy undefined symbols in other libs. > > I'm not into bfd enough to understand what it actually does

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on.... (they use none of its symbols)

2009-03-24 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:00:41 -0430, Muammar El Khatib написа: > No, Debian is not BSD. But we have this > http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/: GNU/kFreeBSD is a GNU system. > Now, as you can see at #502083 and #320697 the use of the flag has > gotten problems before. The keyword here is

RFS: lynkeos.app (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4 of my package "lynkeos.app". It builds these binary packages: lynkeos.app - Tool to process planetary astronomical images for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. (Actually, there are two linitan warnings -- postinst

Re: Quilt and patches directory

2008-09-17 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:28:54 +0200, Michael Biebl написа: > I didn't know that > foo: bar baz > will result in bar/baz run in parallel. I thought there is some kind of > guarantee that bar is processed first. Consider this example which illustrates that it's not a safe assumption to make always ev

Re: RFS: dgtdrv

2008-07-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:33:52 +1000, Ben Finney написа: > POSIX is usually treated as an initialism, so should be spelled in > all-capitals. Not necessarily: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/13886/focus=4187 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/13916 -- To UNSUB

RFS: helpviewer.app (updated package)

2008-07-10 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3-6 of my package "helpviewer.app". It builds these binary packages: helpviewer.app - Online help viewer for GNUstep programs The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 450890, 489695, 489880 The pack

RFS: mpdcon.app (updated package)

2008-07-09 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.99-4 of my package "mpdcon.app". It builds these binary packages: mpdcon.app - MPD controller for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 490087 The package can be found on mentors.debian

RFS: lynkeos.app (updated package)

2008-07-09 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-3 of my package "lynkeos.app". It builds these binary packages: lynkeos.app - Tool to process planetary astronomical images for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 455771, 489845 The

RFS: lusernet.app (updated package)

2008-07-09 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-4 of my package "lusernet.app". It builds these binary packages: lusernet.app - News Reader for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 454274, 489696, 489879 The package can be found

Re: RFS: projectcenter.app (updated package)

2008-07-06 Thread Yavor Doganov
Vincent Bernat wrote: > > Maybe you should also ask Debian GNUstep maintainers. I am one of them (I believe so, at least :-)), and Hubert Chathi (uhoreg) -- the only DD in the team -- just uploaded this particular package (thanks!). I'm just trying to find a permanent sponsor, as Hubert cannot p

Re: Problem with implicit rule for .o files and overriding of CXXFLAGS.

2008-07-06 Thread Yavor Doganov
At Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:03:51 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > I don't know; this text still makes me feel uneasy. > > how about : > > When a Debian binary package is built, environment variables such as > {{{CFLAGS}}} and {{{CXXFLAGS}}} are set by {{{dpkg-buildpackage}}} > and may override the

RFS: projectcenter.app (updated package)

2008-07-06 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.0~20080704-1 of my package "projectcenter.app". It builds these binary packages: projectcenter.app - IDE for GNUstep Development The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 443666, 443676, 451460, 453

Re: Problem with implicit rule for .o files and overriding of CXXFLAGS.

2008-06-27 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:14:55 +0200, Daniel Leidert написа: > or tell him to better use one of the following: > > DEFS += -DVERSION="\"1.00\"" This won't work. The objects are built by make's built-in implicit rules, and this variable is not used there: COMPILE.cc = $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) $(CPPFLAG

Re: Problem with implicit rule for .o files and overriding of CXXFLAGS.

2008-06-27 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:48:32 +0900, Charles Plessy написа: > Would the following be better? > > When a Debian binary package is built, variables such as {{{CFLAGS}}}, > {{{CXXFLAGS}}}, {{{CPPFLAGS}}},... are set by the Debian building > system to override the ones in the {{{Makefile}}}. I d

Re: Problem with implicit rule for .o files and overriding of CXXFLAGS.

2008-06-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
Георги Данчев wrote: > > This is true, unless the `override' directive is used in the > makefile to override variables set with a command line argument. Sure, make gives you plenty of rope to hang yourself, to abuse the users of your program, or to come up with something absolutely adorable. I d

Re: Problem with implicit rule for .o files and overriding of CXXFLAGS.

2008-06-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:14:44 +0900, Charles Plessy написа: > When a Debian binary package is > built, variables such as {{{CFLAGS}}}, {{{CXXFLAGS}}}, > {{{CPPFLAGS}}},... are set in the environnement and override the ones > in the {{{Makefile}}}. That's not entirely true and not entirely f

Re: Problem with implicit rule for .o files and overriding of CXXFLAGS.

2008-06-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:24:17 +0900, Charles Plessy написа: [ I had not looked at the `proda' package, sorry. ] > OTHERFLAGS = -DVERSION="\"1.00\"" > CXXFLAGS = -g -W -Wall -pedantic $(OTHERFLAGS) Use CPPFLAGS for this -- of course the recipes should be properly written in order to have some eff

Re: RFS: adun.app (updated package):wq

2008-01-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Andreas Tille wrote: > > Yavor, do you agree with these steps before an upload? Of course! > Are you specifically interested in biology related programs No, I don't even qualify as a user of such programs (which automatically means I cannot be maintainer). My intention was to offer this for ad

RFS: adun.app (updated package)

2008-01-19 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-1 of the package "adun.app" (QA upload). It builds these binary packages: adun.app - Molecular Simulator for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean (except one informational tag, which would be better if addressed by t

Re: RFS: lusernet.app (updated package)

2007-10-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Явор Доганов wrote: > > sponsor (Danial Baumann) reduced his sponsoring activity so I prefer ^^ That ought to be "Daniel", of course. I apologize.

RFS: lusernet.app (updated package)

2007-10-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-3 of my package "lusernet.app". This version is an update for the ongoing GNUstep transition, along with some trivial housekeeping changes. My last sponsor (Danial Baumann) reduced his sponsoring activity so I prefer not to bothe

Re: RFS: jabbin

2007-01-23 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:29:33 +1100, Andrew Donnellan написа: > Could someone who has a ppc system try this version? It still fails to build: ../voip/stun.cpp:681:7: error: #error Need some way to seed the random number generator ../voip/stun.cpp:722: warning: unused parameter 'input' ../voip/stu

Re: RFS: fbxkb

2007-01-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:42:32 +0200, Damyan Ivanov написа: > -=| Yavor Doganov, 12.01.2007 10:27 |=- >> If you have outdated config.{sub,guess} the package (probably) will >> fail to build on GNU/k*BSD, GNU/Hurd and some peculiar GNU/Linux >> arches, such as armeb, for instanc

Re: RFS: fbxkb

2007-01-12 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:37:28 +0200, Damyan Ivanov написа: > * Why do you build-depend on autotools-dev? I see to auto* usage in > debian/rules - just simple ./configure; make. If you have outdated config.{sub,guess} the package (probably) will fail to build on GNU/k*BSD, GNU/Hurd and some peculiar

Re: RFS: lusernet.app (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-09-28 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:35:26 +0200, Daniel Baumann написа: > Gürkan Sengün wrote: >> Yes he is co-maintaining the package, please sponsor this package. > > done. Thank you very much. It seems that someone removed it from m.d.n before I manage to do so, that's good. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: lusernet.app (updated package)

2006-09-27 Thread Yavor Doganov
Daniel Baumann wrote: > > I think he will offer you co-maintainership, and if so, I'll sponsor the > upload if you want. He already offered me (although not documented on a public ML/buglog), and he's aware that I've been working with Sergey Golovin for the new Pantomime stuff. Gürkan, could you

RFS: lusernet.app (updated package)

2006-09-27 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1 of the package "lusernet.app". It builds these binary packages: lusernet.app - News Reader for GNUstep The package is lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 350435, 356531 It would also help the completion of the ongo

Re: RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app [sponsored]

2006-09-24 Thread Yavor Doganov
The package is in NEW, many thanks to Margarita Manterola. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app

2006-09-21 Thread Yavor Doganov
Георги Данчев wrote: > > Well, that might not be the case with you, but I find Neil's note > quite reasonable to keep in mind. I agree completely. I know about Anjuta's nefarious features in this respect, so I always keep it in mind. But rather than trying to guess upstream's intentions, I pre

Re: RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app

2006-09-21 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:35:15 -0300, Margarita Manterola написа: > Running linda over the package gives this: > > E: rssreader.app; The character '¼' is forbidden by RFC822. > E: rssreader.app; The character 'Ã' is forbidden by RFC822. I really don't know how to fix these, debian/control contains

Re: RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app

2006-09-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Явор Доганов wrote: > Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > > Don't forget to also add the build-dependency 'dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19)' > > then. > > The release of Sarge is coming, isn't it? I meant "Etch" here, of course. On second thought, this might be necessary for people that are building the package

Re: RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app

2006-09-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Don't forget to also add the build-dependency 'dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19)' > then. I thought about this as everybody is doing it, but since backports of GNUstep apps are painful and the current transitioned packages are binary incompatible with the previous GNUstep libs, I g

Re: RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app

2006-09-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Neil Williams wrote: > Yavor Doganov wrote: > > > the files clearly indicate that they're under > > GPL, but contain the confusing "See the GNU Library General Public > > License for more details". > > Just a note: This could be down to the IDE bein

Re: RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app

2006-09-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
James Westby wrote: > > I cannot sponsor I am afraid, but I have a few comments. > > * "Upgrade to debhelper v5, adjust the build-dependancy accordingly and > bump debian/compat.", but debian/compat = 4. Ouch! Fixed, thanks. > * The description is a bit lacking in my opinion. I'll di

RFS to fix RC bug: rssreader.app

2006-09-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.2.dfsg-1 of my package "rssreader.app". It builds these binary packages: librsskit0 - GNUstep framework for parsing and manipulating RSS feeds (library files) librsskit0-dev - GNUstep framework for parsing and manipulating RSS feeds

Re: RFC: quilt-el

2006-07-03 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:41:12 +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: > Use 3. When the upstream releases new version you can drop the patches. > Using dpatch(1) to manage this is easy Given the name of the package in question, I don't really think that he'd be using dpatch ;-} -- JID: [EMAIL PROTEC

<    1   2   3   4