Re: pbuilder root seems to lack support for usrmerge when doing autopkgtest

On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:53:52 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > (Looking through my other chroots, it looks like only the unstable > and the experimental ones are merged, in the others, including the > testing ones, /bin is still a directory. Interesting.) Haha, upgrading a trixie chr

Re: pbuilder root seems to lack support for usrmerge when doing autopkgtest

On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:35:37 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I configured pbuilder (Uploaders in CC) to run autopkgtest after a > successful build. This worked nicely until yesterday (at least - may be > a couple of days before but I did not noticed). Since yesterday I get: > > E: /bin resolved

Re: license-reconcile

On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 12:51:51 +0100, Peter Blackman wrote: > I found license-reconcile useful for checking new debian/copyright files, > but it was removed from the archive in 2020. > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/license-reconcile > > Is anyone aware of an equivalent package? Maybe

Re: Upload to NEW rejected

On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:51:26 +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: My guess is different lintian versions, aka ftp-master running an older lintian version which had a different formatting of the output. Compare the strings: > texlive-binaries: lintian output: 'embedded-library usr/bin/pdftex: poppler',

Re: Help with Lintian error in python3 (pybind11-wrapped) package

On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 01:19:38 -0700, JOSE LUIS BLANCO CLARACO wrote: > I attach the output of "dpkg -I" for the final binary package, where > the "Depends: python3" is visible, Copied from the attached file: Depends: phyton3 phyton3 != python3 :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`.

Re: Access request to Salsa repository

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:44:38 -0400, Thomas Ward wrote: > On 8/30/22 16:11, Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote: > > - how can I know who sponsored this package? (if I knew it, I would send > > the access request directly to him) > This will show on the Tracker once it updates.  You can then take a look at

Bug#1010074: RFS: show-in-file-manager/1.1.4-1 [RFP] -- Open the system file manager and optionally select files in it

On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:31:50 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2022-04-24 22:32:05, Tino Mettler wrote: > > Am 24.04.2022 um 22:04 schrieb Antoine Beaupré : > > I was not aware that the package defines any test specific bits. Can you > > point me to the relevant part? I had the impression that

Re: Handling files with no copyright notices, many contributors

On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 18:51:37 +, John Scott wrote: > It includes a statement that the license is GPL 2 only with system > calls note (basically a GPL exception), and it's already distributed as > part of the kernel, so surely it's free. However, I'm having trouble > figuring out what to put in

Re: Packaging project with existing debian/ folder

On Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:46:45 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 09:26:35PM +, Peymaneh Nejad wrote: > > Intuitively I would just replace the existing folder with my own packaging > If you use source package format "3.0 (quilt)" (which you should anyhow) > this is done

Re: Bug#849471: Python Module minimalmodbus

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:56:35 +0100, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote: > since a friend of mine asked for a small python-module, I decided to > make my first steps with that module. [..] > Could please someone analyse the package and tell me wether I did > something wrong or in a bad way? if not, whom

Re: Sending gpg keys to keyserver

On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 19:47:47 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote: > But I get this error: > $ gpg -v --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-key 'fingerprint' > gpg: sending key 0x to hkp://keyring.debian.org > gpg: keyserver send failed: Connection refused > gpg: keyserver send failed: Connection refused

Bug#976674: RFS: menu-cache/1.1.0-1.1 [NMU] [RC] -- LXDE implementation of the freedesktop Menu's cache (libexec)

Control: tag -1 + pending On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 20:41:17 +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "menu-cache": Uploaded to DELAYED/2; thanks for your work! Cheers, gregor -- .''`.

Re: FTBFS due to SIGABRT while running HTTP server tests, bug #973526

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:21:10 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > >> what(): resolve: Host not found (authoritative) > Looks like it tries to resolve something, and that usually implies > Internet access, as otherwise you could just connect to localhost? > Accessing the Internet is forbidden

Re: Jitsi meet packaging

On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:10:17 +0200, Fioddor Superconcentrado wrote: > - Review some introductory videos and documentation on Debian packaging > that I read/watched ago and need a second check. Lucas' packaging tutorial is a good starter IMO:

Re: Packaging a .NET Core application & pbuilder

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:14:36 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:31:10PM +, Alistair J R Young wrote: > > > > Are these acceptable caveats for a source package in contrib, > > > No, the package still needs to be built without network, using only its > > > contents

Bug#963832: RFS: iotop-c/1.0-1 [ITP] -- iotop-c - simple top-like I/O monitor (implemented in C)

On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:42:23 +0300, Boian Bonev wrote: > > It's not enabled by default, but you can add > > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+bindnow > > to debian/rules to add the flag. > -export LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,now $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get LDFLAGS) > +export

Bug#963832: RFS: iotop-c/1.0-1 [ITP] -- iotop-c - simple top-like I/O monitor (implemented in C)

On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:09:03 +0300, Boian Bonev wrote: > Checking further I see that in order to enable this protection, a -Wl,- > z,now needs to be added to LDFLAGS and dpkg-buildflags does not include > it (at least on my sid install). For the sake of test, I have added it > in Makefile and the

Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:19:58 -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: > > You can add a watchfile that is empty except for a comment explaining > > the situation. > > > That looks good, it's also what lintian recommends right? Yes, I think so. > Changed debian/watch to: > > version=4 > #

Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme

On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:36:56 -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: > Em 25/06/2020 18:19, Adam Borowski escreveu: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45:56AM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich > > wrote: > >>* debian/watch: added a fake site to explain about the current status > >> of

Bug#963105: RFS: libscgi-perl/0.6-1 [ITP] -- libscgi-perl - SCGI server library for perl

On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:06:53 -0400, Richard Hansen wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libscgi-perl" For those reading along at home: The package found its place in its natural habitat: the Debian Perl Group. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian

Re: Seeking Daniel Schepler

On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:34:20 +, David Griffith wrote: > I'm trying to get in touch with Daniel Schepler . He > maintains several packages related to Interactive Fiction and I have some > private questions about some stuff he has written. Has anyone communicated > with him recently? He's

Bug#925876: RFS: libgsm/1.0.18-2 [RC]

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 14:37:10 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:51:28 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgsm" > > > dget -x > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgsm/l

Bug#925876: RFS: libgsm/1.0.18-2 [RC]

On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:51:28 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgsm" > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgsm/libgsm_1.0.18-2.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > [ gregor herrmann

Bug#913091: RFS: scdoc/1.5.2-1

On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:48:25 +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > * I believe using *such* notation in package description is bad idea; >it is confusing to those, who are not accustomized to markdown, and >is not processed specially by tools. Just a historical side note: *bold*, /italic/, and

Re: Build dependency

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:52:11 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > reverse-depends -b packageX > > (reverse-depends is in ubuntu-dev-tools) > build-rdeps packageX > (needs just regular devscripts, although you want dose-extra to handle B-Dep > on Dep chains) Interesting, I admit that I didn't know (or

Re: Build dependency

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:25:35 +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > I know that > apt-cache rdepends packageX > show me the list of the packages that depends of packageX. But, how can > I obtain the list of packages that build-depends of packageX? reverse-depends -b packageX (reverse-depends

Re: Copyright: in d/copyright - Questions about writing copyright info

On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:23:29 -0400, Tong Sun wrote: > > You can also check the file with: cme edit dpkg-copyright. > > > > These tools require cme packages with its recommended dependencies. > > cme - Check or edit configuration data with Config::Model > > This is not the cme packages that you

Re: Source repackaging workflow with git-buildpackage

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:34:07 +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > I want to remove some files from upstream tarball foo-1.23 (already > in Debian) to produce foo-1.23+ds using git-buildpackage following > the recipe posted here [1]. Cf. also https://perl-team.pages.debian.net/howto/repacking.html >

Re: missing email after upload and other problems

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:02:33 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > I've uploaded to mentors via: > > $ dput mentors cdpr_2.4-3_amd64.changes > Package has already been uploaded to mentors on mentors.debian.net > Nothing more to do for cdpr_2.4-3_amd64.changes > Any help in: > A) Sponsoring this

Re: sql-ledger on salsa?

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 14:57:34 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Adam Borowski wrote: > > As you say you have the repository on your disk, I skipped finding out how > > to read archived Alioth projects, thus the repo is empty -- please push. > Download the tarball, extract it and

Re: VCS repositories

On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:18:44 +, Warlich, Christof wrote: > I'm a bit desperate to find out how the Debian project maintains > its patches w.r.t. upstream repositories. Thus, while I can explore > the _current_ patches of a package by looking at the > "*.debian.tar.gz"-archive after obtaining

Re: Package EOL checklist

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:20:49 -0800, Joseph Herlant wrote: > 5. Once there is no more package depending on yours (probably after a > few months), ask the ftp masters to remove the package from testing > and unstable via a mail to their list. "From unstable" (it will be removed automatically from

Re: Fixing incorrect .orig

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:45:38 +, Wookey wrote: > Is there a suffix typically used for this situation of essentially > 're-done upstream source' (a bit like we use ds for 'debianised > source' or somesuch when it's been repacked, usually to remove > non-free things or non-source things)? I

Bug#883628: ITP: ioport -- direct access to I/O ports from the command line

On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:07:28 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > Note that dch(1) when invoked with "-r" will do that for you, > along with updating the timestamp. (note that dch will throw away > it when you do not edit anything in the log, workaround is 'dch -r ""') Unless you set

Re: How to get debian ci test passed for proxy application

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:45:21 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 5:36 AM, gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 18:42:22 +, James Cowgill wrote: > >> I think you might need a "Restrictions: isolation-containe

Re: How to get debian ci test passed for proxy application

On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 18:42:22 +, James Cowgill wrote: > > My local test shows all pass, while debian ci test [1] shows a > > connection timeout message. > > So I'm wondering whether debian ci support network activity, and how > > can I configure the test to get it passed. > I think you might

Bug#868086: RFS: beautify-bash/1.1-1 [ITP]

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 06:12:54 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > override_dh_installchangelogs: >dh_installchangelogs CHANGES This can be removed from debian/rules, dh_installchangelogs finds CHANGES and some other common names all by itself. Cheers, gregor -- .''`.

Re: Is there any chance to easily find out Qt5 Build-Depends (Was: Bug#874851: [clustalx] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:10:45 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > After that you'll get better errors (the first one being "QPushButton: No > > such file or directory"). > > Assuming that I would get the error message above I also would have no > idea how to deal with it. As far as I can see

Re: Help needed for pandas bug: Could anybody verify the suspicion that tzdata might have some influence?

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:18:20 +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > I did some digging: > > Maybe it's a bug in python-tz? > Most likely: FWIW, python-tz also has a FTBFS bug: https://bugs.debian.org/858133 Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Debian Developer

Re: HELP: Fixing a debconf bug in proftpd

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:47:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > 1. Would anybody so kind to have a look at this issue? It is our show > > stopper to get back into testing. > > From a /very quick glance/, it looks like the package is basically using > "debconf as a registry". > > Longer version: In

Re: bioperl autopkgtest failure: Can't find 'build_params' in _build at /usr/share/perl5/Module/Build/Base.pm line 1291.

per https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Tori Amos: Icicle From f4274e7a89979cc115e2ad763177e33e30245128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

Re: bioperl autopkgtest failure: Can't find 'build_params' in _build at /usr/share/perl5/Module/Build/Base.pm line 1291.

: Winds Of the old Days From ec2b4e1a9303f20d9c8430420372378cd0ea56f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:33:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] autopkgtest: fix use.t by adding debian/tests/pkg-perl/use-name which tells autopkgtest-pkg-perl which module to 'use'. --- debian/tes

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:23:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I guess pabs meant that you're not actually using it in debian/rules. > Urgs, thanks for opening my eyes. ;-) :) > Index: rules > === > --- rules (Revision 23284)

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:47:37 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > So I did not yet considered this last resort and hope for some help from > people who are more confident with gdb debugging than I am (Ive read > here frequently some phrases like "10 minutes of gdb debugging" but I'm > afraid it would

Re: Help: r-cran-treescape does not build on i386, armel and armhf any more

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:30:41 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Well, adding xvfb was the usual trick to cope with "unable to open X11 > > > display" messages and thus I added it ... > > To me it looks like you didn't add it yet, at least not to the version > > in Debian. > Hmmm, > $ apt-get

Re: Problems to import origtar with gbp import-orig (Was: ncbi-blast+ new upstream version git import merge error)

On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:21:32 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > forwarding issue to debian-mentors > As there is not enough data in the message, I'm assuming it's about the > published repo. > The upstream/2.4.0 tag is not merged into master so the debian/2.4.0-* > tags are not its descendants.

Bug#840799: RFS: libcbitcoin-perl/0.2-1

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 09:38:03 +0900, Joel DeJesus wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcbitcoin-perl", a > Perl wrapper for the other package I am trying to get a sponsor > for, picocoin. Since libcbitcoin-perl is already in a pkg-perl git repo, there's no need for putting it on

Re: git-import-orig: work around a .gitignore file ignoring debian/ ?

On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:53:40 +0200, Raphaël Halimi wrote: > I maintain a package and the latest release tarball from source > unfortunately contains a .gitignore file listing debian/. I can't import > it in my git copy with "gbp import-orig --uscan" and patch it in > debian/patches afterwards,

Re: create Debian Source from GIT repository without tag

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:58:32 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> What is the best way to create a Debian Source from the upstream GIT > >> repository ? > > git archive would be enough, you don't need uscan for that. > > You can't have a debian/watch in this case, of course. > Do you have a example

Bug#834288: RFS: dblatex/0.3.8-1

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:34:06 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I *believe* that a correct reading of "actualize" is "to make actual" or > "to make true". That can be interpreted as the action of replacing some > not reference not real/true/actual anymore with something more >

mail formatting (was: Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD))

On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 17:07:08 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > [I didn't read rest of thi>s mail because it made my head hurt. > >Gianfranco, please write complete sentences, and please don't top-post.] > yes, sorry :) > (I have a bad MUA, sometimes top-posting is necessary :( ) No, it's

Re: When to use "Replaces"?

On Mon, 30 May 2016 20:25:56 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > c) Something else ...? > As both unclutters provide generally the same functionality, you may also > use the "alternatives" method. My impression is that the "new" version has different command line options. So calls to unclutter

Bug#816919: RFS: newsbeuter/2.9-1 [ITA]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:34:06 +0200, Nikos Tsipinakis wrote: Thanks for all your work, that's really exciting, and I'm happy to sponsor this upload. > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:49:38AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > Will take a cl

Bug#816919: RFS: newsbeuter/2.9-1 [ITA]

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:48:39 +0200, Nikos Tsipinakis wrote: > > The highlighting feature seems to be broken (no idea if this is a > > problem in newsbeuter or ncurses; I haven't retried to rebuild 2.8-2 > > to check). Too show what I mean: I have in my ~/.newsbeuter/config > Apparently this issue

Bug#816919: RFS: newsbeuter/2.9-1 [ITA]

On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:48:37 +0200, Nikos Tsipinakis wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newsbeuter" > > * Package name: newsbeuter > Version : 2.9-1 > Upstream Author : Andreas Krennmair > * URL :

Re: Bug#801253: reproducing and fixing lintian errors of wicd 1.7.3-3 package

On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 18:12:36 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > > $ lintian ../wicd-daemon_1.7.3-3_all.deb > > $ lintian ../wicd-gtk_1.7.3-3_all.deb > > $ > > > > ==> Where is my mistake? > > On which Debian release have you run lintian? On Debian stable? (I > guess so, because the deprecated "git

Re: Fixing GCC-6 FTBS

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:44:52 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Peter Spiess-Knafl , 2016-01-20, 19:13: > >apt-get install gcc-6 > > apt-get install -t experimental gcc-6 I ended up with "apt-get install gcc g++ -t experimental" earlier today to get the whole set of packages

Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:32:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:37:39PM +0530, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: > > I didn't get the point of copyright. You suggested that I inform > > upstream that MIT is kind of ambiguous, Can you give some pointers to > > initiate a discuss with

Bug#807995: postnews sponsorship

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:20:02 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/15/2015 07:01 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:32:22 -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > >> If you would still be willing to sponsor my updated 'postnews' > >> package,

Bug#807995: postnews sponsorship

On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:32:22 -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > On 05/16/2013 10:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >Please ping me back once you have 0.6 ready, > If you would still be willing to sponsor my updated 'postnews' package, I > would greatly appreciate it. (Note also

Re: cowbuilder/pbuilder: require newer version from experimental

On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:11:08 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > What could be the cause that the dependency is not satisfied from > experimental here? I'm using a preferences file in my experimental chroots: # cat /var/cache/pbuilder/amd64/experimental-base.cow/etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin:

Re: "not-binnmuable-all-depends-any" problem exists for Multi-Arch: foreign, too?

On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:39:44 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Johannes Schauer wrote... > > in fact, this can already be done: > > > > Package: foo > > Architecture: any > > Version: 5.25-3+b1 > > Provides: foo (= 5.25-3) > > Oy! So what's the reason those who trigger binNMUs do not utlize this

Re: Questions before my first upload attempt

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:50:04 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: I configured dput for http, as shown in http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers Strangely it said ftp and not http in its messages: - $ dput -f

Bug#795347: RFS: pkwalify/1.22-1 (Closes: #792031)

On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:09:26 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: d/control: debhelper =9 might be better For perl arch:all packages there are no relevant changes between debhelper compat level 8 and 9. But yes, it at least makes lintian (with its new pedantic warning) happy. perl, perl (=

Re: rules file and build directory

On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 23:25:32 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:04:38AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: Maybe dpkg-architecture can help here: % dpkg-architecture | grep GNU_TYPE DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=x86_64-linux-gnu DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE=x86_64-linux-gnu

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:04:18 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: Quoting Daniel Stender (2015-07-19 17:52:16) I'm looking for a convenient way to test build source packages against resp. on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 instead of setting up simple end user Qemu boxes and build within them.

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:34:17 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: Quoting gregor herrmann (2015-07-20 10:14:12) cowbuilder and qemu-debootstrap work for me (with armhf and armel, haven't tried with other architectures): http://info.comodo.priv.at/blog/cowbuilder_crossbuilds_for_raspbian.html

Re: rules file and build directory

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:52:07 +0200, Eugen Wintersberger wrote: override_du_auto_test: cd BUILDDIR make my_super_test My original question was: where do I get BUILDDIR from? For instance, when you use cmake the build directory (relative to the location where the rules file is

Re: Pbuilder requests Build-Depends on local machine - why this?

On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:57:18 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: since I'm back from vacation and upgraded my testing system I realised that when using pbuilder the Build-Depends of some package seem to be required also on the machine that is creating the pbuilder chroot (=where you start pdebuild).

Re: Pbuilder requests Build-Depends on local machine - why this?

On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:35:49 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: Hm, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786690 Thanks! On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:14:33 +0200 gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: So you have to pass -d (for making the checks non-fatal, i.e. warnings, again

Re: packaging Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer - automatic debian build

On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:27:49 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: gbp-import-orig(1) takes --git-pristine-tar, so this is not needed. You can also set this option to default via e.g debian/gbp.conf Best practice would also to sign your tags, so either --sign-tags or again via gbp.conf IMO it's easier

Bug#765924: RFS: libgom/0.2.1-1

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:29:20 -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote: I know there's a new version upstream but I don't really want to push it and go back at the end of the new queue as it's already been several month I'm waiting for the package to arrive in the distribution. No need to wait, the NEW

Re: Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:50:03 +0100, Tony Houghton wrote: I suppose the relative size of the existing dbg packages makes a strong case against including debugging symbols in the main package. If you want to get rid of the -dbg package you can probably do so without a bad conscience, since we'll

Re: dpkg-source: info: local changes detected and gbp:error: Cannot parse archive name

On Sun, 31 May 2015 22:54:58 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 05:03:29PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote: It looks to me like the configuration.log file, which is written during compilation of gpaw is treated as a source modification. How should I handle this? You need

Re: Testing GUI programs

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:11:13 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: I have a package (saods9) with a graphical user interface (Tk), and I want to make some basic build-time and CI tests. The program can be controlled from the command line; however it needs a running X server to start. I could depend

Re: CI tests

On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:33:51 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: for one of my packages (python-astropy), I want to create a Continuous Integration test. However, I seem to not understand some basics: * Are the tests done with the installed package, or with the installed sources, or both? [..]

Bug#782173: RFS: chrony/1.30-2 [RC] -- Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 01:00:12 +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package chrony [..] dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chrony/chrony_1.30-2.dsc I'd be willing to sponsor this upload, I just saw

Bug#775441: RFS: apulse/0.1.5-1

On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:05:42 +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: apulse - PulseAudio emulation for ALSA libapulse - PulseAudio emulation for ALSA - the libapulse libraries libapulse-dev - PulseAudio emulation for ALSA - the libapulse devel libraries Hey, this is nice :) But there's at

Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]

On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:50:59 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: * In d/changelog, urgency should be low since it's a new package Is this documented somewhere? My mentor had told me upon the second upload of my package that I

Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:27:44 +1100, Riley Baird wrote: Testing migration for packages not in testing still is 10 days. Cf. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/11/msg7.html (Default Urgency); maybe that's what Riley's mentor had in mind. Ah, okay, thanks. Should I

Bug#771361: RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1

On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:02 +, Tony Houghton wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm. I have also posted an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two bugs? Please add the requested information (i.e. a debdiff of the .dsc files) to #771358. It would make

Re: Bug#771245: RFS: wmanager/0.2.1-12 (fix an important bug in jessie)

On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 23:41:41 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: Thanks for your clear and comprehensive description what this is all about, what the situation is and what you've done -- that made it easy for me to find the motivation to look into it :) Thanks for the kind words and for taking

Bug#766244: RFS: dwb/20140702hg-1.1 [RC]

On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:04:57 +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: On 26.10.2014 15:27, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: * Patch work: - Add from Fedora: dwb-gtk-deprecated.patch --fix FTBFS. (Closes: #763220) Okay. Please send a message to #763220 saying that there is a patch available and

Re: Access to Debian machines

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:42:52 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: As a Debian Developer, I would now for the first time need to access a Debian machine (armhf). However, trying to ssh to one of them (arm-arm-01.debian.org) gives me a Permission denied (publickey). Let's look at

Re: libavifile-0.7c2 : Depends: libavifile-0.7-common (= 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16+b2) but 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16 is to be installed

On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:23:11 +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: I'm currently working on the packaging of fw4spl (an open source framework) and I got this error when a run pbuilder : The following packages have unmet dependencies: libavifile-0.7c2 : Depends: libavifile-0.7-common (=

Bug#754227: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-6

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 + pending On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 22:40:17 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gdal You found one since this contains only my patch, and building the package

Bug#753649: RFS: liblinux-inotify2-perl/1:1.22-1 [ITA] -- scalable directory and file change notification

On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 22:34:42 +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote: * Package name: liblinux-inotify2-perl Version : 1:1.22-1 Upstream Author : Marc Lehmann schm...@schmorp.de * URL : http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/Linux-Inotify2.html * License : Perl

Re: Renaming a source package

On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:24:37 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: I'll summarize my answers from the bug and perhaps provide some more: There's also https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' :

Re: script-with-language-extension

On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 21:39:01 +, Dave Walker wrote: Net::Frame::Device includes two scripts that are installed to /usr/bin, but both have .pl extensions therefore giving me a Lintian warning. My initial thought on fixing this is to rename the files by overriding dh_auto_install in

Re: Test builds in gbp patch-queue branch [was: Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?]

On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 08:38:06 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote: 'gbp buildpackage' fails because it detects altered files in the source code. Ah, here it is in the manpage: --git-export=treeish Thanks Gregor, but I was already aware of --git-export=WC --git-ignore-new. I have used this

Re: Test builds in gbp patch-queue branch [was: Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?]

On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 23:37:22 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote: 'gbp buildpackage' fails because it detects altered files in the source code. Or can I override gbp buildpackage (with pbuilder as an option) in some way so that it ignores the fact that there are altered files? Yes, you can: ==

Re: Maintainer scripts: execute command as another user: use sudo or su?

On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 22:55:20 +0100, Emilien Klein wrote: One minor challenge that I faced is that I couldn't get the commands to run using su. With the help of Karsten Hilbert I understood that the issue was that the user being a system user, she didn't have a shell (default shell for new

Bug#739003: RFS: libsocket6-perl/0.25-1 [ITA]

On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:49:21 +, Daniel Lintott wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package libsocket6-perl Have you considered joing the Debian Perl Group? We'd be happy to have you and this package in our ranks, and you'd get support and sponsors there. I hadn't thought about

Bug#739003: libsocket6-perl

On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:18:07 +, Daniel Lintott wrote: And the package is already in git -- thanks! I've now, as per our usual workflow, added some TODO items to the top of debian/changelog. Don't hesitate to ask on the list or on IRC if my comments are too cryptic :) It

Bug#739003: libsocket6-perl

On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:33:15 +, Daniel Lintott wrote: replace dh $@ with dh $@ --buildsystem=perl_makemaker then dh will use Makefile.PL etc. and everything looks good The only snag is still going to be the missing LDFLAGS (relro in particular) for Socket6.so Hm, I'm not sure about

Bug#739003: RFS: libsocket6-perl/0.25-1 [ITA]

On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:32:57 +, Daniel Lintott wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libsocket6-perl * Package name: libsocket6-perl Version : 0.25-1 Upstream Author : Hajimu UMEMOTO u...@mahoroba.org * URL :

Re: Wanted: Watch file with version encoded in download dir

On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:21:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: does anybody have an idea how to write a working watch file for http://spades.bioinf.spbau.ru/release3.0.0/ where the version is encoded in the download dir and the download file or do I have no better option than writing upstream a

Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:55:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: version=3 opts=downloadurlmangle=s/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/ \ http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*) uscan: In debian/watch, potentially unsafe or malformed

Re: Help for watch file needed for ssake

On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:54:43 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: The following seems to work: version=3 opts=downloadurlmangle=s{([\d.]+)$}{$/ssake_v$1-tar.gz}g \ http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*) Hmmm, it just drops the tarball named 3.8.1

Re: Packaging GNUstep automatically

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:12:56 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Markus Hitter wrote: Packaging is out of the scope of Debian? That's an unexpected response. :-) You asked about automated packaging, which isn't something we do in Debian right now AFAIK. And IMO all

  1   2   3   4   >