Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

control: tags -1 moreinfo >https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd can you please remove moreinfo once the package enters unstable? thanks G. > the same for libvpd applies here > > "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" > > maybe something like > License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

Hi, new packaging uploaded : https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsvpd https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsvpd/lsvpd_1.7.7-1.dsc > the same for libvpd applies here > > "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" > > maybe something like > License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception > > is

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

Hi >Spaces are not allowed in license names. But here the license name is >just “GPL-2+”. > >Let me quote the relevant part of the spec: >“An exception or clarification to a license is signalled in plain text, >by appending ‘with exception’ to the short name.” probably when I tried a) this

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-06-02, 17:07: "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" maybe something like License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception "FOO with BAR exception" is a valid licence syntax in DEP-5. If it is not appropriate to use it in this case, then you

mail formatting (was: Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD))

On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 17:07:08 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > [I didn't read rest of thi>s mail because it made my head hurt. > >Gianfranco, please write complete sentences, and please don't top-post.] > yes, sorry :) > (I have a bad MUA, sometimes top-posting is necessary :( ) No, it's

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

Hi, >The same... what? I can't parse this sentence. the same review done for the other packages applies to this one (yes, indeed I should have written it better, I explained it somewhere else) >"FOO with BAR exception" is a valid licence syntax in DEP-5.>If it is not >appropriate to use it

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-06-02, 16:19: the same for libvpd applies here The same... what? I can't parse this sentence. "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" maybe something like License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception "FOO with BAR exception" is a

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo the same for libvpd applies here "License: GPL-2+ with librtas exception" maybe something like License: GPL-2+-with-librtas-exception is better (check lintian if complains) abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) ;; useless ^^ apt-get

Bug#826135: RFS: lsvpd/1.7.6-1 ITP: lsvpd -- Utility to List Device Vital Product Data (VPD)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsvpd" Package name: lsvpd Version : 1.7.6-1 Upstream Author : lsvpd team URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/linux-diag/files/lsvpd/ License : GPL-2+