Re: C++ help needed for new version of tifffile

2017-10-05 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2017-10-05 21:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> I migrated the Debian packaging of tifffile from SVN to Git[1]. After >> upgrading to the latest upstream version (dated 2017-09-14) I get: >> >> ... >> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -DNDEBU

Re: C++ help needed for new version of tifffile

2017-10-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:56:39PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2017-10-05 21:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > It seems that the definition of GET_NEXT_CODE is just wrong - but > > what would be correct? > > Remove the last backslash, or include a blank line after it. This > prevents the "st

Re: C++ help needed for new version of tifffile

2017-10-05 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2017-10-05 21:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I migrated the Debian packaging of tifffile from SVN to Git[1]. After > upgrading to the latest upstream version (dated 2017-09-14) I get: > > ... > x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-ali

Re: C help needed for new version of tifffile

2017-10-05 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Andreas, On 10/05/2017 09:00 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > It seems that the definition of GET_NEXT_CODE is just wrong - but > what would be correct? So the code contains the following: #define GET_NEXT_CODE \ code = *((uint32_t*)((void*)(encoded + (bitcount >> 3; \ if (little_endian

C++ help needed for new version of tifffile

2017-10-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I migrated the Debian packaging of tifffile from SVN to Git[1]. After upgrading to the latest upstream version (dated 2017-09-14) I get: ... x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/tifffile-2017091