Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:43:22PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
...
Ahem, I see, mistakes happen, thus clean chroots (and note to myself: clean
apt caches;-) are to be used for such tweaking. In fact, other packages'
{Build-}dependencies change over time, it is
Am Sonntag, den 16.05.2010, 19:19 +0100 schrieb Tony Houghton:
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
[..]
Well, xmlto does not pull any latex packages AFAICS, and my cowbuilder
--login
test says dice wrt build-dependencies drag:
[..]
Looks like you're right. I uninstalled a load of tex
Hi,
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:43:22PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
...
Ahem, I see, mistakes happen, thus clean chroots (and note to myself: clean
apt caches;-) are to be used for such tweaking. In fact, other packages'
{Build-}dependencies change over time, it is pretty common since new
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:07:11 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-14, 15:41:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
the example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I moved the man
pages upstream I got a bug report
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:57:39PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:07:11 +0200
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-14, 15:41:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
the example in the New Maintainers'
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-16, 12:57:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
the example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I moved the man
pages upstream I got a bug report because the location of docbook.xsl
isn't consistent across OSs
Just
* Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org, 2010-05-16, 21:44:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per
the example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I moved the man
pages upstream I got a bug report because the location of
docbook.xsl isn't consistent across OSs
Just use
On Sun, 16 May 2010 21:44:42 +0900
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
override_dh_auto_build:
xsltproc --nonet \
--param make.year.ranges 1 \
--param make.single.year.ranges 1 \
--param
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-16, 16:06:
override_dh_auto_build:
xsltproc --nonet \
--param make.year.ranges 1 \
--param make.single.year.ranges 1 \
--param man.charmap.use.subset 0 \
Jakub Wilk writes:
Hi,
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-16, 16:06:
override_dh_auto_build:
xsltproc --nonet \
--param make.year.ranges 1 \
--param make.single.year.ranges 1 \
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared to
those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect big wins here ;-)
AFAICT
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared to
those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect
George Danchev writes:
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared
to those pulled in the
* George Danchev danc...@spnet.net, 2010-05-16, 20:51:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as
compared to those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect big wins
here ;-)
AFAICT the above trio don't
On Sun, 16 May 2010 20:51:45 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the
Jakub Wilk writes:
* George Danchev danc...@spnet.net, 2010-05-16, 20:51:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as
compared to those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect big wins
here ;-)
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 20:51:45 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Tony Houghton writes:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc docbook-xsl
docbook-xml
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per the
example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I moved the man pages
upstream I got a bug report because the location of docbook.xsl isn't
consistent across OSs so I started using xmlto instead.
The trouble with xmlto is it
* Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk, 2010-05-14, 15:41:
Originally I used xsltproc to generate roxterm's man pages, as per the
example in the New Maintainers' Guide, but when I moved the man pages
upstream I got a bug report because the location of docbook.xsl isn't
consistent across OSs
Just use
19 matches
Mail list logo
