On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:15:08PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >Are you sure that it makes sense to add more and more JS packages - its
> >simply for a single package dependency for the moment. However, if
> >somebody confirms that this package is sensible also for other purposes
> >I mi
On 07-11-2016 13:11, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:57:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> When doing a websearch this might mean that the JS contains errors - but
>>> it seems there is a different converter which has no problems. Before
>>> I start
Hi,
>Are you sure that it makes sense to add more and more JS packages - its
>simply for a single package dependency for the moment. However, if
>somebody confirms that this package is sensible also for other purposes
>I might fire up npm2deb ...
seems that I'm not the only one thinking that...
Hi Gianfranco,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:57:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >When doing a websearch this might mean that the JS contains errors - but
>
> >it seems there is a different converter which has no problems. Before
> >I start debugging what exactly happens in "npm install"
Hi,
>When doing a websearch this might mean that the JS contains errors - but
>it seems there is a different converter which has no problems. Before
>I start debugging what exactly happens in "npm install" I wonder whether
>comebody could enlighten me what's the best way to get the minimized JS.
Hi,
I'd like to upgrade the package r-cran-shiny. The new upstream version
contains babel-polyfill.min.js. I think I found the source which can be
obtained via
npm install --save-dev babel-polyfill
mv node_modules/babel-polyfill/dist/polyfill.js babel-polyfill.js
While this pro
6 matches
Mail list logo
