Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-11 Thread James Westby
[Apologies for replying to my own message again, but Adam keeps mentioning things in other channels to which I cannot respond] On (09/09/06 19:57), James Westby wrote: After discussion on IRC it seems that a compile flag is wanted to do this. Ok, in #361400 you say you are not happy with

Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-11 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
James Westby wrote: [Apologies for replying to my own message again, but Adam keeps mentioning things in other channels to which I cannot respond] On (09/09/06 19:57), James Westby wrote: After discussion on IRC it seems that a compile flag is wanted to do this. Ok, in #361400

Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-09 Thread James Westby
On (09/09/06 05:44), Adam Cecile wrote: On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 01:26:18 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so the trick is to modify the SConscripts of the relevant packages to build for more than just the default python version. Tha attached patch does this. You might wat to

Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-09 Thread James Westby
On (09/09/06 13:19), James Westby wrote: On (09/09/06 05:44), Adam Cecile wrote: A friend told me the file must be python's version independent, what do you think about it ? I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean. After discussion on IRC it seems that a compile flag is wanted

Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-08 Thread James Westby
On (03/09/06 12:13), James Westby wrote: On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:16:13 +0200 Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm working on Museek+ packaging and I have a problem. There is an arch dependent file in python-museekd (mucipher.so) and it should be built for python2.4

Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-08 Thread Le_Vert
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 01:26:18 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On (03/09/06 12:13), James Westby wrote: On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:16:13 +0200 Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm working on Museek+ packaging and I have a problem. There is an arch dependent

Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-03 Thread James Westby
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:16:13 +0200 Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm working on Museek+ packaging and I have a problem. There is an arch dependent file in python-museekd (mucipher.so) and it should be built for python2.4 and 2.3. But the package doesn't include a

Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-02 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hi, I'm working on Museek+ packaging and I have a problem. There is an arch dependent file in python-museekd (mucipher.so) and it should be built for python2.4 and 2.3. But the package doesn't include a python 2.3 version of the file and dependency is set to python =2.4... Package: