Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-09 Thread Eriberto
Thanks Roger! 2014-08-08 20:04 GMT-03:00 Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org: Hi Eriberto, 3. Is normal this issue? I got this message in a clean jail and in cowbuilder/pbuilder. Please, try in cowbuilder: Ok, I did get these in normal building (tried it in cowbuilder as well). I've checked

Bug#754793: marked as done (RFS: mosquitto/1.3.4-1 RC)

2014-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:24:17 -0300 with message-id cap+dxjevf9-bchfffhhe3zvm-_fnvn5weokwuh32w5ltkn1...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS: mosquitto/1.3.4-1 RC has caused the Debian Bug report #754793, regarding RFS: mosquitto/1.3.4-1 RC to be marked as done. This means

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-08 Thread Roger Light
Hi Eriberto, 1. Update d/copyright. The current copyright for Troy is 2003-2013. Oh yes, I missed that. 2. I found: # This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project for use in # the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/) # This product includes cryptographic software

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-08 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-08 11:29 GMT-03:00 Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org: Hi Roger! Thanks for your reply. 2. I found: # This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project for use in # the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/) # This product includes cryptographic software written by Eric

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-08 Thread Roger Light
Hi Eriberto, 3. Is normal this issue? I got this message in a clean jail and in cowbuilder/pbuilder. Please, try in cowbuilder: Ok, I did get these in normal building (tried it in cowbuilder as well). I've checked and they're not important. There won't be any trace dumps in the next release.

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-06 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-05 20:58 GMT-03:00 Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org: Hi Roger, When the mosquitto broker runs as root, it will always attempt to drop privileges to the mosquitto user by default, or another user if so configured. If it is not running as root, this does not happen. I don't believe that

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-05 Thread Roger Light
Hi Eriberto, 1. You need to put all changes in d/changelog. You can use your VCS to check it. Ok, I have done this. 2. In d/changelog, you should use urgency=medium, not high. Fixed. 3. The cowbuilder builds the package. However, when building the package in a new Sid environment (new,

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-02 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-01 19:18 GMT-03:00 Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org: Thanks for taking the time to start a review. Hi Roger! You're welcome. 4. All readmes should be put in /usr/share/doc/mosquitto. Do you have a reason to put them in /etc? These READMEs are simple explanations of empty directories,

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-01 Thread Eriberto Mota
tags 754793 moreinfo thanks Hi Roger, how are you? I will try help you. Please: 1. Update the Standards-Version from 3.9.4 to 3.9.5. 2. d/copyright: please, update the years (include 2014, because I found it in your upstream code). 3. d/docs: The final user doesn't compiles codes. So, send

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-01 Thread Cameron Norman
El vie, 1 de ago 2014 a las 10:32 , Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org escribió: 6. There is a .conf in /etc/init. What is this? That would be an Upstart job. Best, -- Cameron Norman

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-01 Thread Eriberto Mota
Thanks Cameron! Upstart isn't familiar to me yet. Regards, Eriberto 2014-08-01 14:39 GMT-03:00 Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com: El vie, 1 de ago 2014 a las 10:32 , Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org escribió: 6. There is a .conf in /etc/init. What is this? That would be an

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.2.1-2 RC

2014-08-01 Thread Roger Light
Hi Eriberto, Thanks for taking the time to start a review. 1. Update the Standards-Version from 3.9.4 to 3.9.5. Done 2. d/copyright: please, update the years (include 2014, because I found it in your upstream code). Done. 3. d/docs: The final user doesn't compiles codes. So, send

Fwd: Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.3.2-1 RC

2014-07-29 Thread Roger Light
PM Subject: Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.3.2-1 RC To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. This upload fixes an RC bug that upstream have fixed in a new release. I have also uploaded a fix

Bug#754793: RFS: mosquitto/1.3.2-1 RC

2014-07-14 Thread Roger Light
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. This upload fixes an RC bug that upstream have fixed in a new release. I have also uploaded a fix to mentors for the same bug to the current packaged version (1.2.1), but would

Bug#719207: marked as done (RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1)

2013-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:23:32 + with message-id e1vd5ns-0003ds...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #719207, regarding RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#719207: RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1

2013-08-20 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 9 août 2013 11:16 CEST, Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org : Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto * Package name: mosquitto Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL

Bug#719207: RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1

2013-08-20 Thread Roger Light
Hi Vincent, Thanks for taking the time to carry out a review. - debian/control: the dependency of libmosquitto-dev is quite odd. Why not (= ${binary:Version})? I understand that you avoid to upgrade the binary package if there is only packaging changes, but sometimes, packaging

Bug#719207: RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1

2013-08-20 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 20 août 2013 23:28 CEST, Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org : - debian/control: the dependency of libmosquitto-dev is quite odd. Why not (= ${binary:Version})? I understand that you avoid to upgrade the binary package if there is only packaging changes, but sometimes, packaging changes

Bug#719207: RFS: mosquitto/1.2-1

2013-08-09 Thread Roger Light
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto * Package name: mosquitto Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD-3-clause

Bug#699651: RFS: mosquitto/1.1.2-1

2013-02-11 Thread Roger Light
I have now fixed the changes, including an upstream release for some of the fixes: * Package name: mosquitto Version : 1.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD-3-clause Section : net

Bug#699651: RFS: mosquitto/1.1.2-1

2013-02-06 Thread Roger Light
Thanks for the detailed review - in particular for the information on python-all. I have fixed the majority of the errors but not yet re-uploaded because I am still deciding what to do about mosquitto_passwd What happened to python-mosquitto's Depends? They are unneeded now that

Bug#699651: RFS: mosquitto/1.1.2-1

2013-02-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
I don't indent to sponsor this package, but here's a quick review: * Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org, 2013-02-02, 22:52: * Bumped standards release to 3.9.3. No changes needed. Lintian says: W: mosquitto source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is 3.9.4) * Debhelper bumped to

Bug#699651: RFS: mosquitto/1.1.2-1

2013-02-02 Thread Roger Light
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto for uploading to experimental only. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 1.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL :

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-29 Thread Roger Light
Hi, On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:59 AM, David Prévot taf...@debian.org wrote: doesn't seem in line with the current freeze policy [0], Rule #1: “do not make changes to the package that are not related to fixing the bugs in question […] this implies *not* […] Changing debhelper compat version” I

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-29 Thread David Prévot
Hi Roger, Le 29/12/2012 11:21, Roger Light a écrit : I've uploaded a new version that doesn't include the unrelated changes. Thanks, the three RC-bug fixes are pretty straightforward, but the DEP-3 headers don't contain an Applied-Upstream field. Since you seem involved upstream, are those

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-29 Thread Roger Light
Hi David, Thanks, the three RC-bug fixes are pretty straightforward, but the DEP-3 headers don't contain an Applied-Upstream field. Since you seem involved upstream, are those fixes not applied upstream because of a rewrite of those parts in the current code? If not, could you please point to

Bug#696907: marked as done (RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC])

2012-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:48:15 -0400 with message-id 50df3aef.3020...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #696907, regarding RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-28 Thread Roger Light
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.15-2 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : 3 clause

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-28 Thread David Prévot
Hi, I haven't looked at the three RC bugs you just filled, nor how you fixed them, but Le 28/12/2012 21:45, Roger Light a écrit : * Bumped standards release to 3.9.3. No changes needed. * Bumped dh compat to 9 to fix hardening-no-fortify-functions. * Fixed

RFS: mosquitto (new upstream version)

2012-02-05 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I have just uploaded an updated version of my mosquitto package and am looking for a sponsor. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.15-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD Section

RFS: mosquitto

2012-01-09 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I have just uploaded an updated version of my mosquitto package and am looking for a sponsor. This is for a new upstream version and also incorporates some of the changes suggested after it was uploaded previously. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.14.4-1

RFS: mosquitto (new upstream version)

2012-01-05 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. This is an updated package for a new upstream version. The package is lintian clean. Thanks, Roger * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.14.3-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL :

RFS: mosquitto (new upstream version)

2011-07-26 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. This is an updated package for a new upstream version. The new version includes an additional exported symbol in the two libraries. I believe I've updated the .symbols files correctly, but would appreciate it being checked. The

Re: RFS: mosquitto (new upstream version)

2011-07-26 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Roger, On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 09:20 +0100, Roger Light wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. This is an updated package for a new upstream version. The new version includes an additional exported symbol in the two libraries. I believe I've updated the .symbols files

Re: RFS: mosquitto (new upstream version)

2011-07-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org, 2011-07-26, 11:33: You have debian/pyversions which you might also want to document in debian/control as XS-Python-Version. No. Use either debian/pyversions or XS-Python-Version, not both. (Just to be clear: XS-Python-Version is not only for documentation

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2011-07-10 Thread Roger Light
Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for updating your package. I've reviewed your changes and it looks mostly fine, except for one issue: Lintian run as lintian -iIE --pedantic gives the following output: W: mosquitto source: debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (= 7.0.50~) [...]

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2011-07-10 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Roger, [...] Lintian run as lintian -iIE --pedantic gives the following output: W: mosquitto source: debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (= 7.0.50~) [...] Instead of copy-pasting this lintian warning, you should have addressed it :-/ - could you please fix that

RFS: mosquitto

2011-07-09 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. It has already been sponsored once - this is an updated version. The new version fixes bug 632589 and bumps the upstream version to the latest version. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.11.3-1 Upstream Author :

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2011-07-09 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Roger, [...] Thanks a lot for updating your package. I've reviewed your changes and it looks mostly fine, except for one issue: Lintian run as lintian -iIE --pedantic gives the following output: W: mosquitto source: debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (= 7.0.50~) [...]

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2011-06-25 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi again, [...] I've fixed these issues and uploaded a new version. [...] Sorry for the huge wait, but finally I've built and uploaded your package. Thanks for all the work, Michael pgpVPMFWxKc4Q.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2011-05-10 Thread Roger Light
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. * Package name    : mosquitto  Version         : 0.9.2-1  Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL             :

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2011-05-02 Thread Roger Light
Hi Michael, Thanks for responding - you've worked up quite a list of reviews there! On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. * Package name    : mosquitto  Version         : 0.9.2-1  

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2011-05-01 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.9.2-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD Section : net [...] I've

RFS: mosquitto

2011-02-14 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.9.2-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD Section : net It builds these binary packages:

RFS: mosquitto

2010-12-28 Thread Roger Light
Hi, I hope you've all had a nice Christmas and have a bit of free time before going back to work :) I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. I realise that it's holiday time, but I'd be very grateful if it could be uploaded before the Ubuntu Debian import freeze, assuming nothing is

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-23 Thread Roger Light
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto, detailed below. It'd be great if someone would give me an early Christmas present by uploading it. There are a few warnings generated when building the package: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be avoided if

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-20 Thread Roger Light
Hi there, I've got a query about binary package names for my package below: * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.9.1-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD Section : net It builds these binary

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-20 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org, 2010-12-20, 16:27: mosquitto_pub - Mosquitto command line publish client mosquitto_sub - Mosquitto command line subscribe client Huh, underscores are not allowed in package names. Should the library -dev package names have the SO version number in or not?

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-20 Thread Roger Light
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org, 2010-12-20, 16:27: mosquitto_pub - Mosquitto command line publish client mosquitto_sub - Mosquitto command line subscribe client Huh, underscores are not allowed in package names. Apologies,

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-18 Thread Roger Light
Hi there, I am looking for a kind soul to sponsor my package mosquitto. It's been through some review on here already and I've made improvements based on reviews of other packages on the list, so I'm fairly confident it's in good shape. * Package name    : mosquitto Version         : 0.9.1-1

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-18 Thread Etienne Millon
Hello, It seems indeed in a very good shape (lintian clean, builds in a clean chroot, DEP-5, …). I had a look at your package and here are a few remarks : - dpkg-shlibdeps and dpkg-gencontrol issue a couple warnings : dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-18 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org, 2010-12-18, 09:20: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mosquitto/mosquitto_0.9.1-1.dsc Don't use quilt to rename files. Such a patch will become maintenance nightmare. Niether lintian nor Debian Policy care what is the name of the upstream changelog

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-18 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-12-18, 13:15: dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package python-mosquitto: unused substitution variable ${python:Versions} dpkg-gencontrol: warning: package python-mosquitto: unused substitution variable ${python:Provides} These two are safe

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-18 Thread Roger Light
Etienne Millon wrote: - dpkg-shlibdeps and dpkg-gencontrol issue a couple warnings : dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be avoided if debian/libmosquittopp0/usr/lib/libmosquittopp.so.0 were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-08 Thread Roger Light
Hello there, What's the ettiquette for re-requesting sponsorship if it's been a while since the previous request? I don't want to annoy anybody. Thanks, Roger On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package

RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-03 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.9.1-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD Section : net It builds these binary packages:

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-30 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:14:53PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org wrote: Hi, [actually, Paul wrote:] I: libmosquitto0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libmosquitto.so.0 I: libmosquittopp0: no-symbols-control-file

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-30 Thread Roger Light
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote: Actually it would be great to have symbols files right from the start. This way, when the next library version comes out, dpkg-gensymbols will add the *new* symbols to the file, and when some package links to this library

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-30 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +, Roger Light wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote: Actually it would be great to have symbols files right from the start. This way, when the next library version comes out, dpkg-gensymbols will add the *new*

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-30 Thread Roger Light
If any public symbols disappear from a library, and if there is any chance that some other package or a not-insignificant number of users were actually using those symbols, you have to change the library's SONAME to reflect an ABI change.  If the library exposes internal symbols in its public

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-30 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Yes, exactly :) Better to get it sorted sooner rather than later. I've uploaded a new version which adds symbol files for the two libraries. It also hides internal symbols for libmosquitto. This was actually quite easy to manually generate with only the relative few symbols. As far as I

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-29 Thread Roger Light
Hi, dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be avoided if debian/libmosquittopp0/usr/lib/libmosquittopp.so.0 were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). I don't know how to fix this. Any suggestions? You should go through the CFLAGS and check to

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-29 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org wrote: Hi, dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be avoided if debian/libmosquittopp0/usr/lib/libmosquittopp.so.0 were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). I don't know how to fix

RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-28 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.9-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : BSD Section : net It builds these binary packages:

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-28 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
I'm not a Debian Developer, but here's my review: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. * Package name    : mosquitto  Version         : 0.9-1  Upstream Author : Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-28 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote: I'm not a Debian Developer, but here's my review: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. * Package name    :

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-28 Thread Roger Light
Hi Paul, Thanks for the pointers. You have one wishlist lintian issue ( try running with -iIE --pedantic ) I: mosquitto source: duplicate-long-description libmosquitto0 libmosquitto0-dev I: mosquitto source: duplicate-long-description libmosquittopp0 libmosquittopp0-dev I've fixed these.

Re: RFS: mosquitto

2010-11-28 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org wrote: Hi Paul, Thanks for the pointers. Pay it forward ;) You have one wishlist lintian issue ( try running with -iIE --pedantic ) I: mosquitto source: duplicate-long-description libmosquitto0 libmosquitto0-dev I: mosquitto