Hi Alessio,
I will check it theses days and let you know when I think it's ready.
Thanks in advance
Nicolas
Le 11 janvier 2012 00:37, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org a écrit :
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Nicolas nikro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arno,
many thanks for
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Nicolas nikro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arno,
many thanks for you report. I will update my packaging for theses cosmetics
changes as you said !
I'd have interest in having this package in Debian, please let me know
when the package is ready for the
Hi Arno,
many thanks for you report. I will update my packaging for theses cosmetics
changes as you said !
Regards,
Nicolas
2011/7/21 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nicolas,
IANADD (twb told me, I shall be lazy!), here are some comments on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nicolas,
IANADD (twb told me, I shall be lazy!), here are some comments on your
package:
On 21.07.2011 09:13, Nicolas wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package phing.
* Please extend description of the -doc package. Its a bit too short.
Hi all,
thanks Benoît. I updated the package following your advices.
I uploaded it on mentors and push my changes on the git repository.
I allways search for a sponsor.
Regards,
Nicolas
Le 2 juillet 2011 00:20, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org a écrit :
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas wrote:
I
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas wrote:
Hi all,
thanks Benoît. I updated the package following your advices.
I uploaded it on mentors and push my changes on the git repository.
There are still a few things that need to be fixed:
- debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Benoît,
On 02.07.2011 10:33, Benoît Knecht wrote:
- debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned
previously.
that's not necessarily a problem. You, apparently a FSFE member could
just take a look into coreutils manpages.
Hi,
- debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned
previously.
I used Arno advice and add twice reporting system, debian on and upstream
one.
- Your debian/copyright file is still not DEP-5 compliant. To repeat
what I said before, it doesn't use a versioned Format
Hi Arno,
Arno Töll wrote:
On 02.07.2011 10:33, Benoît Knecht wrote:
- debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned
previously.
that's not necessarily a problem. You, apparently a FSFE member could
just take a look into coreutils manpages. See, for instance, cp(1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Benoît,
On 02.07.2011 11:52, Benoît Knecht wrote:
If it was upstream's man page, of course I wouldn't suggest modifying it
in that way. But since it was written by the packager, and at least for
now will mainly be installed on Debian, I think
Nicolas wrote:
- debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned
previously.
I used Arno advice and add twice reporting system, debian on and upstream
one.
- Your debian/copyright file is still not DEP-5 compliant. To repeat
what I said before, it doesn't use a
Benoit,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Nicolas wrote:
Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same.
Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License
paragraph.
actually you may be interested in the base-files package having
Arno Töll wrote:
On 02.07.2011 11:52, Benoît Knecht wrote:
If it was upstream's man page, of course I wouldn't suggest modifying it
in that way. But since it was written by the packager, and at least for
now will mainly be installed on Debian, I think it makes sense not to
advise users to
Hi Kilian,
Kilian Krause wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Nicolas wrote:
Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same.
Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License
paragraph.
actually you may be interested in the
Hi all,
I think and I hope that time it's ok :
- I add description for expat and apache license
- I add a special stanza and only one for LGPL-3 license
- I remove email for bug.
All changes push to mentors and git repository.
Regards,
Nicolas
Le 2 juillet 2011 12:28, Benoît Knecht
Nicolas wrote:
I think and I hope that time it's ok :
- I add description for expat and apache license
That's much better. I don't think you should have Copyright (c) 1998,
1999, 2000 Thai Open Source Software Center Ltd in the Expat license
text though, that would belong to the 'Copyright:'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Benoît,
On 02.07.2011 14:10, Benoît Knecht wrote:
- I remove email for bug.
I'm happy with that change, but maybe Arno disagrees ;)
I'm fine with that. I was just disagreeing with you, denoting upstream's
preferred way to report bugs should
Hi,
Le 2 juillet 2011 14:10, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org a écrit :
Nicolas wrote:
I think and I hope that time it's ok :
- I add description for expat and apache license
That's much better. I don't think you should have Copyright (c) 1998,
1999, 2000 Thai Open Source Software
Hi Nicolas,
(BTW, please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.)
Nicolas wrote:
[...]
I think it's ready for sponsor. I just have to find one.
It's in much better shape, yes. Thanks for taking our remarks in
consideration.
Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of the
Hi,
Le 2 juillet 2011 15:21, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org a écrit :
It's in much better shape, yes. Thanks for taking our remarks in
consideration.
I think, even if I made packages for more than one year, I a kind of newbie
and any advices are helpful. I like improve my knowledge.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 02.07.2011 17:54, Nicolas wrote:
Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of the
unpacked .deb, 15MB are documentation. I would say it's definitely worth
having a separate phing-doc package in this case.
[..]
Good idea.
Hi all,
I splitted the package and created a phing-doc package that hold the
documentation.
Regards,
Nicolas
2011/7/2 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 02.07.2011 17:54, Nicolas wrote:
Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the
Le Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:28:26PM +0200, Benoît Knecht a écrit :
Kilian Krause wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Nicolas wrote:
Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same.
Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package phing.
* Package name: phing
Version : 2.4.5-1
Upstream Author : Hans Lellelid h...@xmpl.org
* URL : http://phing.info/
* License : LGPG-3
Section : devel
It builds
Hi Nicolas, here are my comments about your work (i'm not a DD):
-debian/control: since you specify '3.0 (quilt)' in debian/source/fomat,
there is no need for a
quilt dependency
-debian/copyright:
-Executing from the sources directory:
$ grep -r copyright .
you get,
Hi,
I'm not DD. I'm sorrry. This my fast review about your package:
1. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control
2. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
3. no necessary quilt as build-dependency[0]
4. under debian/copyright specify license version, LGPL-3 (i.e)
5. for your patch,
Hi,
thanks I will fix that soon.
Regards,
Nicolas
2011/6/29 Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com
Hi,
I'm not DD. I'm sorrry. This my fast review about your package:
1. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control
2. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
3. no necessary quilt as
27 matches
Mail list logo
