Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6p2-1
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpococrypto9 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library
libpococrypto9-dbg - The C++ Portable
Hi,
Hi Günter
can you please respond a short statement about API and ABI stability
of poco.
- Patrick
we generally try very hard to maintain API (source-code level)
compatibility between releases, especially in the core libraries
(Foundation, XML, Util, Net).
ABI (binary)
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes:
George Danchev:
I also uploaded a new upstream version 1.3.6p1.
Uploaded with the last two changelog entries of yours included.
Can you please upload poco-doc too. Thanks!
Sure, thanks for the poke. Uploaded with the following change: I moved your
Hi Günter
can you please respond a short statement about API and ABI stability of poco.
- Patrick
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: Re: RFS: poco (updated package)
Datum: Samstag 26 Dezember 2009
Von: George Danchev danc...@spnet.net
An: Patrick Roland Gansterer par
George Danchev:
I also uploaded a new upstream version 1.3.6p1.
Uploaded with the last two changelog entries of yours included.
Can you please upload poco-doc too. Thanks!
- Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes:
George Danchev:
I'm still waiting for an answer to this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html
Do you think that a symbols file will be the correct solution? I didn't
check the ABI history of poco, so i don't know if it is backward
2009/12/24 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
[...] Is the original
maintainer (CC'ed) aware of you being a co-maintainer?
Yes, I am. We will maintain poco at alioth [1].
[1] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/poco.git
Regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
I'm still waiting for an answer to this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1
of package poco and poco-doc.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev -
George Danchev:
I'm still waiting for an answer to this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html
Do you think that a symbols file will be the correct solution? I didn't check
the ABI history of poco, so i don't know if it is backward compatible and if
this is a goal of
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
(I'm the usual sponsor of poco and poco-doc, and I'm looking for co-
sponsors;-)
Some preliminary comments follow:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1
of package poco and poco-doc.
It builds these binary packages:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1
of package poco and poco-doc.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpococrypto9 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library
libpococrypto9-dbg - The C++
2009/9/1 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks.
Thank you! Would you upload poco-doc too?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco-doc/poco-doc_1.3.5-1.dsc
Also uploaded. Thanks for the heads-up!
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB
2009/9/1 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks.
Thank you! Would you upload poco-doc too?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco-doc/poco-doc_1.3.5-1.dsc
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl
On Sunday 30 August 2009 20:37:13 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
2009/8/30 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
* it would be better to explicitly build-depends on zlib1g-dev
Dependency add and new package uploaded to mentors.d.n.
This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks.
--
2009/5/27 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix that
to dynamically link with the system provided libz, or is there any reason I'm
not aware of to use the
On Sunday 30 August 2009 16:41:26 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
2009/5/27 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix
that to dynamically link with the system
2009/8/30 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
* it would be better to explicitly build-depends on zlib1g-dev
Dependency add and new package uploaded to mentors.d.n.
Regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl
http://www.burghardt.pl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2009/5/31 Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl:
2009/5/27 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix that
to dynamically link with the system provided libz,
2009/6/1 Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl:
2009/5/31 Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl:
2009/5/27 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
dmitrij.led...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/1 Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl:
2009/5/31 Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl:
2009/5/27 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
dmitrij.led...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not a Debian Developer but I've met this one with one of my
upstreams as well. The reasoning is very vague. My upstream has been
keeping an ancient copy of zlib in their tree/releases just because
it's
2009/5/27 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net:
The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix that
to dynamically link with the system provided libz, or is there any reason I'm
not aware of to use the
On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:14:10 krzysz...@burghardt.pl wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.5-1.dsc
Looks good. I also checked buildability of clamfs with poco 1.3.5-1 (the only
package in the archive which build-depends on libpobo-dev).
The
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.5-1
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpococrypto8 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library
libpococrypto8-dbg - The C++ Portable
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-2
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpococrypto6 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library
libpococrypto6-dbg - The C++ Portable
On Saturday 15 November 2008 13:16:07 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-2
of my package poco.
Package uploaded. Thanks for taking care of these bugs.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
Hello George,
2008/6/25 George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
of my package poco.
[...]
The upload would fix these bugs:
On Friday 27 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
--cut--
I just realized that I forgot to add new patch to patches/00list, so
pacakge is still buggy. Version 1.3.2+dfsg1-3 has this missing line
add.
Hello George,
2008/6/25 George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
of my package poco.
[...]
The upload would fix these bugs: 487392, 487394, 487934
An excellent bug handling as
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library
libpocodata5-dbg - The C++ Portable
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpocodata5 - The C++
2008/1/20, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I believe that you should either license your packaging work under the
same license as the upstream source or add an exception to the licensing
on your packaging work to allow it to be linked with OpenSSL.
I think simple patches are not eligible for
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
2008/1/19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes
W: libpoco2: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
N:
N: This package
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes
W: libpoco2: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
N:
N: This package appears to be covered by the GNU GPL but depends on the
N:
Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2008/1/19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes
W: libpoco2:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
39 matches
Mail list logo
