Yet more changes have been made...
New upstream release (well CVS anyway..). Line fitting now works.
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with
Hi Don!
You wrote:
Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and
you can trivially convert to the later.)
How? gs doesn't seem to have a svg output driver.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
You wrote:
Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and
you can trivially convert to the later.)
How? gs doesn't seem to have a svg output driver.
pstoedit's libplot driver writes svg and generally works... [although,
it
Hi Don!
You wrote:
Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and
you can trivially convert to the later.)
How? gs doesn't seem to have a svg output driver.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
You wrote:
Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and
you can trivially convert to the later.)
How? gs doesn't seem to have a svg output driver.
pstoedit's libplot driver writes svg and generally works... [although,
it
There are two separate things that you deal with in R.
The first is raw data. A simple spreadsheet program like gnumeric or a
texteditor sufices to enter the data.
Once you've got the raw data, you (ideally) perform all of the
manipulations of that data in R to prepare your graphs. In
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, James Stone wrote:
I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn
with a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people
do. [But when you need
I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with
a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do.
[But when you need its features, it's often the only
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, elijah wright wrote:
methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN
Like http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/ ? ;-)
Don Armstrong
--
The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing
that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing
There are two separate things that you deal with in R.
The first is raw data. A simple spreadsheet program like gnumeric or a
texteditor sufices to enter the data.
Once you've got the raw data, you (ideally) perform all of the
manipulations of that data in R to prepare your graphs. In
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, James Stone wrote:
I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn
with a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people
do. [But when you need
I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with
a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do.
[But when you need its features, it's often the only
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, elijah wright wrote:
methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN
Like http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/ ? ;-)
Don Armstrong
--
The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing
that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
...but lacks a simple spreadsheet for data editing/easy viewing of
raw figures. The same is probably true for R. The spreadsheet
functionality is the reason why I had a look at rlplot; but what I
am looking for is a replacement for proprietary software
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
...but lacks a simple spreadsheet for data editing/easy viewing of
raw figures. The same is probably true for R. The spreadsheet
functionality is the reason why I had a look at rlplot; but what I
am looking for is a replacement for proprietary software
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
development, but AFAIK it is the only
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
development, but AFAIK it is the only
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like
Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:45:43AM +0100, James Stone wrote:
Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:45:43AM +0100, James Stone wrote:
Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting
Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:10:15 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:10:15 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with error bars.
I have uploaded the packages to
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with error bars.
I
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with error bars.
I
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with error bars.
I have uploaded the packages to
35 matches
Mail list logo
